Correspondence from Whelan to Lado Re: Lost Diskette and Robert Crain Study
Correspondence
August 13, 1992
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Correspondence from Whelan to Lado Re: Lost Diskette and Robert Crain Study, 1992. 4e2211a5-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/013c4391-e479-404f-9a66-89202191fa16/correspondence-from-whelan-to-lado-re-lost-diskette-and-robert-crain-study. Accessed November 03, 2025.
Copied!
“od } i
% " 2 Ll
n
\ | MacKenzie Hall
110 Sherman Street
Hartford, CT 06105
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL
ATTORNEY GENERAL
FAX (203) 523-5536
Office of The Attorney General
% ; Tal: 566-7173
State of Connecticut
August 13, 1992
Marianne Engelman Lado, Esq.
NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
RE: SHEFF v. O'NEILL/LOST DISKETTE, ROBERT CRAIN STUDY
RE - I I I ET I TT LP II IH
Dear Marianne:
On July 16, 1992 I copied you on letter to Phil Tegeler and
Martha Stone in which I explained that the diskette containing
the data used by Dr. Robert Crain in his studies was missing. I
asked that we be provided with another copy of the diskette. By
a letter dated July 21, 1992, Phil Tegeler advised me that you
would be in touch with me regarding the diskette. As of this
writing, I have not heard from you nor has Dr. Armour received
another copy of the diskette.
our search for the original diskette has not been
successful. We can only speculate it was erroneously discarded.
Obviously, we are in need of your cooperation in securing another
COpY.
The delay in the analysis of the data on the diskette caused
by our having lost the item will mean that Dr. Armour will not be
able to address questions relating to his review of the data
during his upcoming deposition. Unless the plaintiffs wish to
forego the opportunity to question Dr. Armour on these matters
prior to trial, another date for his deposition will need to be
set. This date would have to be set in consideration of the
amount of time it will take Dr. Armour to develop an
understanding of the data file, decide upon appropriate analyses,
and conduct such analyses.
Your cooperation in providing us with another copy of the
diskette is absolutely essential to the timely completion of the
work that needs to be done before the trial.
Marianne Engelman Lado, Esq.
August 13, 1992
Page 2
1f, for some reason, the plaintiffs have decided not to
provide us with another copy of this diskette, please let me know
right away. At. that point 1.will be forced to bring ‘this matter
to the attention of the court and secure a resolution of whatever
issues need to be decided in order to obtain the diskette. Of
course, this will further delay necessary trial preparations.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
RIC HERP BLUMENTHAL
ATTO REY pe NEBAL
BY & oka R. Whelan
Asgistant Attorney General
JRW: ac
cc: "Philip Tegeler, Esq.
Martha Stone, Esq.
Martha M. Watts, Asst. Atty. Gen.
Dr. David Armour