Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Les Hollingsworth, Esq. Re: Smith v. City of Pine Bluff
Correspondence
April 17, 1986

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Les Hollingsworth, Esq. Re: Smith v. City of Pine Bluff, 1986. a7e85fdc-e992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/033757f3-61a7-40cb-a9c6-90087317ca8c/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-les-hollingsworth-esq-re-smith-v-city-of-pine-bluff. Accessed October 08, 2025.
Copied!
Lesa,EDrenseH. ApriI I7, I986 Les Hollingsworth, Esq. 415 Main Street Main Place Building Little Rock, AR 7220L Re: Smith v. Citv of Pine Bluff Dear Les: This brief deals with many of the same issues raised by the Smith remand. We may want to follow David Lippman's approach in the Sarasota case and submit to defendants the Section 2 evidentiary factors as part of a Request to Admit. I have a law student in Chambers' class at the Uni- versity of Pennsylvania Law School preparing a Motion for Preliminary Injunction with supporting memorandum. In the meantime, I thought you might want to see the brief first, to make some initial strategy decisions. S iy'cey'e Iy ,/ ..v ---' U Arr-L '/L>ini Guinier LG/mgw Contributions are dcductible lor U-5. ituome ta.r Wr?o*s The NAACp LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND is not part ot the National Association lor the Advanccmcnt of colore-d Poople although il *ai rounoeo oi itino strares idiommitment ro equal righti. LDF has had lor over 25 years a separatc Board, program, stall, otlico and budget. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE ANO EDUCAT]ONAL FUND, INC. 99 Hudson Street, New york, N.y. 10013o(212) 21$.1900