Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Les Hollingsworth, Esq. Re: Smith v. City of Pine Bluff
Correspondence
April 17, 1986
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Les Hollingsworth, Esq. Re: Smith v. City of Pine Bluff, 1986. a7e85fdc-e992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/033757f3-61a7-40cb-a9c6-90087317ca8c/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-les-hollingsworth-esq-re-smith-v-city-of-pine-bluff. Accessed January 07, 2026.
Copied!
Lesa,EDrenseH.
ApriI I7, I986
Les Hollingsworth, Esq.
415 Main Street
Main Place Building
Little Rock, AR 7220L
Re: Smith v. Citv of Pine Bluff
Dear Les:
This brief deals with many of the same issues raised by
the Smith remand. We may want to follow David Lippman's
approach in the Sarasota case and submit to defendants the
Section 2 evidentiary factors as part of a Request to Admit.
I have a law student in Chambers' class at the Uni-
versity of Pennsylvania Law School preparing a Motion for
Preliminary Injunction with supporting memorandum. In the
meantime, I thought you might want to see the brief first,
to make some initial strategy decisions.
S iy'cey'e Iy ,/ ..v ---'
U Arr-L
'/L>ini Guinier
LG/mgw
Contributions are dcductible lor U-5. ituome ta.r Wr?o*s
The NAACp LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND is not part ot the National Association lor the Advanccmcnt of colore-d Poople although il
*ai rounoeo oi itino strares idiommitment ro equal righti. LDF has had lor over 25 years a separatc Board, program, stall, otlico and budget.
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE ANO EDUCAT]ONAL FUND, INC.
99 Hudson Street, New york, N.y. 10013o(212) 21$.1900