Order Transferring Enterprise District Case

10 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Includes Correspondence from Clerk Sachs to Clerk Thomas.

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- Educational Equity
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organization
- LDF
Matter
- Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education
Case
- Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education
U.S. state
- Mississippi
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 30a77217-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421

Cite this item

Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Order Transferring Enterprise District Case, 1974. 30a77217-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/033ba058-519a-4f6f-9131-b3c9227bf701/order-transferring-enterprise-district-case. Accessed October 05, 2025.

Copied!

    Linited States Gonrt nf Appeals 

FIFTH CIRCUIT 

EDWARLZ W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET 

CLERK NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130 

May 15, 1974 

Mr, Robert CO, Thomas, Clerk 
PD. 8S. District Court 
P. OO. Box 769 
Jackson, Mississippi 39205 

County, et al. 
  

Dear Mr. Thomas: 

Enclosed is a certified copy of an order entered by the 
court transferring the Enterprise School District case 
to your Court, 

Very truly yours, 

W. WADSWORTH, Clerk 

By Ce LL F- 5 Ail 
/ctfs Deputy Clerk 
enclosure 

  

cc and enclosure 

Hon. Dan M. Russc 

Mr, Jack Greer 
My "Vevey 3 T 
NX ° Da Vid i. . 

Mr. Melvyn Leventhal 
Mr. Thomas M. Keeling 
Mr. Robert BE. Covington, Jr. 

 



  

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS; 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT" "" 7 #/0SI0RTH 

  

Nos. 28030 & 28042 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v, 

HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 4075(J)) 

  

BUFORD A. LEE, et al., 

Plaintiffs- Appellees, 

Y. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant- Appellant. 

Vv. 

MILTON EVANS, 

Third Party 

Defendant- Appellee. 

(Civil Action No. 2034(H)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

KEMPER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1373(E)) 

  

 



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

  

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 3807(J)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

v. 

NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE 

SCHOOL, DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1120(W)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

MARION COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 2178(H)) 

  

JOAN ANDERSON, et al., 

Plaintiffs- Appellants, 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Intervenor- 

Appellant, 

v. 

THE CANTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 

et al., and THE MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL 
DISTRICT, et al., 

2? 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 3700(J)) 

  

 



  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

. SOUTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED 
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 3984(J)) 

      

BEATRICE ALEXANDER, et al., 

Plaintiffs- Appellants, 

V. 

HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 3779(J)) 

  

ROY LEE HARRIS, et al., 

Plaintiffs- Appellants, 

Vv. 

THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 

et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1209(W)) 

  

JOHN BARNHARDT, et al., 

Plaintiffs- Appellants, 

Va 

MERIDIAN SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1300(E)) 

  

 



  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

NESHOBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1396(E)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

V. 

NOXUBEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1372(E)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1367(E)) 

  

DIAN HUDSON, et al., 

Plaintiffs- Appellants, 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Intervenor- 

Appellant, 

v. 

LEAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al., 

Defendants- Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 3382(J)) 

  

 



  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL, 

et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 2199(H)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

AMITE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 3983(J)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vi 

COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants- Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 2148(H)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

v. 

LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 2216(H)) 

  

 



  

JEREMIAH BLACKWELL, JR., et al., 

Plaintiffs- Appellants, 

Vv. 

ISSAQUENA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1096(W)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1160(W)) 

  

CHARLES KILLINGSWORTH, et al., 

Plaintiffs- Appellants, 

V. 

THE ENTERPRISE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 
and QUITMAN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1302(E)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

XY. 

LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 4292(J)) 

  

 



  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, et al., : 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1368(E)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff- Appellant, 

Vv. 

FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 4256(J)) 

  

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Mississippi 

  

ORDER 
  

Pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court in Alexander 
  

v. Holmes County Board of Education, 1969, 396 U. 8.19, 80 S. Ct. 
  

29, 24 L. Ed. 2d 19, this Court has retained jurisdiction of the with- 

in captioned school cases pending the desegregation of each system. 

Subsequent to this decision of the Supreme Court, the follow- 

ing orders were entered by this Court with respect to The Enterprise 

Consolidated School District: 

(1) United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir., 
    

November 7, 1969, 423 F. 2d 1264 (The Enterprise Consolidated 

School District). 

Meanwhile the semi-annual status reports required by our 

decision in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir., 1970, 
  

  

 



433 F. 2d 611, 618-19, have been filed through and including 

  

October 15, 1973. 

It now appearing that The Enterprise Consolidated School 

District school system has been and is being maintained as a 

unitary school system in compliance with the aforesaid orders, 

and it further appearing that it would be le he to transfer 

jurisdiction of the case to the district court under a final order 

there to be entered as follows, it is ORDERED: 

(1) Jurisdiction of No. 1302(E), Charles Killingsworth, 
  

et al., v. The Enterprise Consolidated School District, et al., 
  

is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Misstabidis, 

(2) Saic case may be placed on the inactive docket of that 

court subject to being reopened for good cause shown on the ap- 

plication of any party, or intervenor, or sua sponte; 
  

(3) The aforesaid orders entered by this Court shall be 

considered as the mandate of this Court and are to be made the 

order of the district court; 

(4) The reports required by United States v. Hinds County 
    

School Board, 433 F. 2d 618-19, supra, may be discontinued in the 
  

event copies of the Summary Reports (Forms 101 and 102) which 

are filed annually with the Department of Health, Education and 

Welfare, along with a report showing faculty and staff assignments 

as required in the Hinds County type of report and faculty and staff 
  

hiring by race if such information is not reflected in the HEW Sum- 

mary Report, are filed simultaneously with the district court and 

served upon counsel for plaintiffs and amicus curiae, and are re- 

tained for a period of two years by the district court for examination 

by counsel for the parties herein or amicus curiae. As an alterna- 

tive to filing the HEW reports, the defendant school districts may 

 



  

continue to file the Hinds County type of report but on an annual 
  

basis not later than November 15 to reflect status as of October 

15 each year. 

IT IS ORDERED THIS15th day of May, 1974. 

{ Xin 1 

| TG H error Bn 
- A) 

  

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE 

Mone Al san/MAL A 
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT re 

  

  

Pi . 3} a i 

4 AA 

UNITED EN i JUDGE 

{2-4 "2 
  

APPROVED AS TO FORM: 

0X do 
Att rney for Plaintiffs 
  

  

“J 

; 7/ 3 

aa. oi Ev rr ios 

bir, 
J 

  

rg / 

7 

: 
Brett 

  

  

Li or The Enterpris 

Consolidated School a 

Defendant

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order Transferring Enterprise District Case

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in