Motion to Require Court Panel to Proceed with Studies and Planning and Set a Schedule
Working File
January 1, 1973
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Motion to Require Court Panel to Proceed with Studies and Planning and Set a Schedule, 1973. 0254191a-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/03f6a6ec-f6f0-4638-9db1-98d66bc9397a/motion-to-require-court-panel-to-proceed-with-studies-and-planning-and-set-a-schedule. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
)
RONALD BRADLEY et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. )
)
WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, )
)
Defendants, )
)
and )
)
DENISE MAGDOWSKI, )
)
Defendants- )
Intervenors, )
)
and )
)
ALLEN PARK, et al., )
)
Defendants- )
Intervenors, )
)
and )
)
KERRY GREEN, et al., )
)
Defendants- )
Intervenors, )
)
and )
)
WAYNE COUNTY INTERMEDIATE )
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., )
Added Defendants. )
)
MOTION TO REQUIRE THE COURT-APPOINTED
PANEL TO PROCEED WITH ITS STUDIES AND PLANNING AND TO SET
A SCHEDULE FOR PROCEEDING IN THIS CAUSE
NOW COME Plaintiffs, Ronald Bradley, et al., and move
this Honorable Court to require the desegregation panel
previously appointed by this Court to proceed with its studies
and planning to the end that there will be no unnecessary
delay in the implementation of an effective plan of desegregation
-as contemplated by the Opinion and Order of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Bradley v. Milliken,
F .2d (Nos. 72-1809 “ 72-1814, June 12, 1973 en banc)
Slip Op. 69-8 0. Plaintiffs further move that this Honorable
#
Court order the defendants, including additional parties joined
pursuant to Rules 19 and 21, to supply administrative and staff
assistance to trie panel upon its request and that the reasonable
costs incurred by the panel be paid as provided by the District
Court’s Order of June 14, 1972. See Ibid. at 69, affirming
in pertinent part, Order for Development of Plan of Desegregation
(June 14, 1972) Part I.C. Plaintiffs further move that this
Honorable Court issue an Order (a) providing a reasonable
opportunity for the parties to file responses (or additional
responses) to the reports submitted by the panel and the
State Superintendent pursuant to the Court’s Order of June 14,
1972; (b) requiring that the panel submit its plan, and supporting
studies, within 75 days from the entry of this Court’s Order;
(c) requiring that the parties file complete legal and
practical objections and any alternatives to such plan,
supporting briefs, and memoranda detailing,in full, proof to
be offered at any hearing no later than 25 days after the
filing of the panel’s report; (d) requiring that the parties
reply within 25 days to such objections and alternatives as
may be submitted; (e) and setting hearings on all relevant
issues raised to commence 15 days thereafter following a
pre-trial conference to sharpen the issues and consider the admiss
ibility of evidence.
Respectfully submitted
LOUIS R. LUCAS
WILLIAM E. CALDWELL
PAUL R. DIMOND
Ratner, Sugermon & Lucas
525 Commerce Title Bldg.
Memphis, Tennessee
906 Rose Avenue
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
J. HAROLD FLANNERY
NATHANIEL JONES
General Counsel
N . A . A . C . P.
1790 Broadway
New York, New York
ROBERT PRESSMAN
Center for Lav; & Education
6l Kirkland St.
Cambridge, Mass. 02138
E. WINTHER McCROOM
3425 Woodburn Ave
Cincinnati, Ohio
JACK GREENBERG
NORMAN J. CHACHKIN
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York
p -