Fax From Broderick to Cox RE: Amended Answer of Defendant-Intervenors
Correspondence
May 14, 1998
8 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Fax From Broderick to Cox RE: Amended Answer of Defendant-Intervenors, 1998. 50d17f3e-e90e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/041be895-3de3-41ee-939b-b0b89a4f7aa5/fax-from-broderick-to-cox-re-amended-answer-of-defendant-intervenors. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
P.B1/16
LDF NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC,
99 Hudson Street
Suite 1600
New York, NY 10013-2897
(212) 219-1800
Fax: (212) 226-7592
MAY 14 '98 12:47 FR 0 LEGAL. DEF FUND 212 226 7592 TO LDF-DC
FACSIMILE INFORMATION SHEET
one Hay 1% [756
TO: “todd (ox, £p.
COMPANY:
FAX #:
FROM: I=SmE BRIDE ek
SUBJECT:
Number of pages to follow: ___ including cover.
COMMENTS: Atoched pre He bl Documeshs Bde
Anendel Quage of Def: Tteeris % Mewma,
bo Suppod_Q blob iN Sedearena
. Nuanonal d onmbutions are The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund. Ine. (LDF) is not part i fp Fapional Off
weeluctiobe for LS, of the National Assosuation for the Advancement af Colored People : edi State 208
"come tax prposes. INAACP) although LDF was founded by the NAACP and shares ins Now py ho ies Muth Supe: commutment to equal rights. LIF hat had. since 1957, 3 separate (OL Zier 30 Anions CA 3085
Fax: (212) 226-7592 Fax: (213) 624-0075
Beard. program. surf, office and budge.
MAY 14 '98 12:48 FR NAACP LEGAL DEF FUND 212 226 7592 TO LDF-DC P.O5-16
AMENDED ANSWER OF DEFENDANT INTERVENORS
Defendant intervenors Alfred Smallwood, David Moore, William M. Hodges, Robert L.
Davis. Jr., Jan Valder, Barney Offerman, Virginia Newell, Charles Lambeth and George Simkins
answer the titled and numbered allegations of the Complaint as follows:
Preliminary Statement
Plaintiffs’ preliminary statement is a summary description of the nature of their claims and
need not be admitted or denied. To the extent an answer is required, the allegations are denied.
The Parties
1, Defendant intervenors do not have sufficient information upon which to form belief
about the accuracy of the allegations of Paragraph 1. Those allegations are therefore dened.
2. It is admitted that James B. Hunt, Jr. is the Governor of the State of North
Carolina. sued in his official capacity. and that pursuant to Article III of the constitution of North
Carolina the executive power of the State is vested in the Governor and it is his duty to take care
that the laws are faithfully executed. It is further admitted that pursuant to N.C.Gen Stat. §163-
194. the Governor shall issue a commission attesting to a person's election as 2 member of the
United States House of Representatives upon the person's production of a certificate of his or her
election from the Secretary of State. Any remaining allegations in Paragraph 2 are denied.
3; It is admitted that Dennis Wicker is the Lieutenant Governor of the State of North
Carolina, sued in his official capacity, and that pursuant to Articles IT and III of the Constitution
of North Carolina, he is President of the Senate and performs such additional duties, including
signing enacted legislation, as the General Assembly or the Governor may assign to him. Any
remaining allegations in Paragraph 3 are denied.
MAY 14 ’98 12:48 FR NAACP LEGAL DEF FUND 212 226 7592 TO LDF-DC P.06/16
4. It is admitted that Harold Brubaker is the Speaker of the North Carolina House of
Representatives, sued in his official capacity, and performs duties, including signing enacted
legislation, assigned to him by the House of Representatives. Any remaining allegations of
Paragraph 4 are denied.
3. Paragraph 5 is admitted,
6. Paragraph 6 is admitted.
7 It is admitted that plaintiffs rely upon the constitutional and statutory provisions
cited in Paragraph 7. Any reaming allegations are denied.
8. The allegations of Paragraph 8 are admitted.
9. It is admitted that venue exists in the Eastern District of North Carolina. The
remaining allegations in Paragraph 9 are denied.
Three-Judge District Court
10 Itis admitted that the convocation of a three-judge district court is required to
adjudicate this action as required by 28 U.S.C. §2284. The remaining allegations in Paragraph 10
are denied.
History of the Case
11. Paragraph 11 is admitted upon information and belief.
12. Paragraph 12 is admitted.
13 Iris admitted that North Carolina became entitled to twelve representatives in
Congress as a result of the 1990 Census, and that the General Assembly undertook to prepare a
MAY 14 '98 14:29 FR NAACP LEGAL DEF FUND 212 226 7592 TO LDF-DC P.01-01
redistricting plan that would contain twelve districts. The remaining allegations in Paragraph 13
are denied.
14. It is admitted that on July 9, 1991, the General Assembly enacted a congressional
redistricting plan which included one majority African American district. All remaining allegations
of Paragraph 14 are denied.
15. It 1s admitted that the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice denied
preclearance of the 1991 plan under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The remaining
allegations in Paragraph 135 are denied.
16. [t is admitted that on January 24, 1992, the General Assembly enacted a second
congressional redistricting plan which included two majority African American districts. All
remaining allegations of Paragraph 16 are denied.
17. Paragraph 17 ts admitted.
18. Paragraph 18 is a legal contention which does not require an answer.
19. The allegations of Paragraph 19 constitute legal contentions. To the extent an
answer required the courts’ opinions speak for themselves and any remaining allegations are
denied.
20. Paragraph 20 is admitted.
21. It 1s admitted that subsequent proceedings were stayed in this action pending the
outcome of the proceedings m the Shaw litigation, including possible legislative action by the
General Assembly to enact a new congressional redistricting plan to cure the constitutional defect
held to exist in the 1992 plan. Any remaining allegations of Paragraph 21 are denied.
a2. Paragraph 22 is admitted.
Post-it* Fax Note 7671 [Pete LTA 98 [olor]
© odd Coe |" Emme Ryadesd
4 Co./Dept, be Co.
Phone # Phone #
Fax # Fax #
xk TOTAL PAGE. D1 kok
MAY 14 '98 12:48 FR NAACP LEGAL DEF FUND 212 226 7592 TO LDF-DC P.a7/16
23 It is admitted that as a result of the general elections conducted in November, 1996
under the redistricting plan which in June. 1996 the Supreme Court had ruled unconstitutional, six
Democrats and six Republicans were elected to Congress and continue to serve there at the
present time. [t is admitted that Melvin Watt, and Eva Clayton are African American, registered
Democrats, and members of Congress. The remaining allegations in Paragraph 25 are denied.
24, Paragraph 24 is denied.
25. Paragraph 25 is denied.
26. Paragraph 26 is denied.
27. Paragraph 27 is denied.
28. Paragraph 28 is denied.
29. Paragraph 29 is denied.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
30. Defendant intervenors incorporate and reallege their responses to prior allegations.
31. Paragraph 31 is denied.
32. Paragraph 32 is denied.
33 Paragraph 33 is denied.
34. Paragraph 34 is dented.
35. Paragraph 35 is dened.
36. Paragraph 36 is denied.
FIRST DEFENSE
Plaintiffs Cromartie and Muse are barred from bringing this action by the doctrines of res
judicata and collateral estoppel.
MAY 14 '98 12:49 FR NAACP LEGAL DEF FUND 212 226 7592 TO LDF-DC P.038/16
SECOND DEFENSE
The 1997 Remedy Plan is not a racial gerrymander.
THIRD DEFENSE
Racial considerations did not predominate, and traditional districting principles were not
subordinated in the construction or design of the 1997 Remedy Plan or in any of the districts in
the Plan.
FOURTH DEFENSE
The state had a compelling interest in creating a majority African American district in the
area of the State covered by the First District in order to comply with Section 2 of the Voting
Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §1973¢c. The African American population m that area of the
State is sufficiently large and geographically compact to afford the opportunity of creating a
majority African American district and is politically cohesive. The white population in that area
votes sufficientlv as a bloc to enable it usually to defeat the African American population's
preferred candidate when elections are conducted in political units with a majority of white voting
age residents. The 1st congressional district is narrowly tailored to serve that compelling interest,
FIFTH DEFENSE
The State had a compelling interest in creating a majority Aftican American district in the
area of the State covered by the First District in order to comply with Section 3 of the Voting
Rights Act, as amended, 42 U S.C. §1973¢, and that district is narrowly tailored to serve that
mnterest.
MAY 14 '98 12:49 FR NAACP LEGAL DEF FUND 212 226 7592 TO LDF-DC P.09/16
SIXTH PEFENSE
A majority African American district is required in the area of the State covered by the
First District in order to remedy past discrimination against African American voters in
congressional redistricting, voter registration. political participation, and elections.
WHEREFORE, defendant intervenors respectfully pray that:
1. This action be dismissed:
2 Plaintiffs be taxed with the cost of this action; and
3. Defendant intervenors have such other and further relief as the Court deems just
and proper.
This 25th day of November, 1997.
// rorln fooler
ADAM STEIN V
ANITA S. HODGKISS
Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins, Gresham &
Sumter, P.S.
512 West Franklin Street
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516
(919) 933-5300
ELAINE R. JONES
DIRECTOR-COUNSEL
NORMAN J. CHACHKIN
JACQUELINE A. BERRIEN
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600
New York, New York 10013
(212) 219-1900
Attorneys for Applicants to Intervene as Defendants