Order to Withdraw Motion to Consolidate; Order to Dissolve Stay

Public Court Documents
August 23, 1999

Order to Withdraw Motion to Consolidate; Order to Dissolve Stay preview

6 pages

Includes fax cover pages.

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Order to Withdraw Motion to Consolidate; Order to Dissolve Stay, 1999. 43e354d2-da0e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/0448bc8b-d56f-438f-8257-bcc3416f8a23/order-to-withdraw-motion-to-consolidate-order-to-dissolve-stay. Accessed July 16, 2025.

    Copied!

    82:21 .66« £2 BNY * 30d 1£1283202 
“2 55/35/99" Won 17:10 FAX 967 4953 FERGUSON STEIN » @oo1 

FERGUSON, STEIN, WALIAS, ADKINS, GRESIIAM & SUMTER, P.A. 312 West Franklin Street + Chapel Hill, NC 27516 Phone (919) 933-5300 « Fax (919) 967-4953 

FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL 
Datc: 5/2344 TIME:  AM/PM 
From: (Ad 4) Sten Ml AR 

Phone: 919/933-5300 Fax: 919/967-4953 

re: Cx 0nuate 

PLEASE DELIVER TO: 

    

  
  

    

          

    

  

  
Nar Todd Coll 

FIRM: 

Cry: 

TELEPHONE #: 

TELECOPIER #: __ 102 — bg ~ |3/> ; 

# QF PAGES AL, INCLUDING COVER SHEET) 

If there arc problems with lis uansmission, please contact Shel at 919/933.5300. 

  
  

    

      

    

        
            
  

Documents Reing Faxed: 

Ordgre 
  
  

    

    

    
    

    

        
  

  
  

    
  

        
  
  
  
  

  
            

  

  
    

  
    
  
The information contrineg In this facsimile message is attarncy privileged and confidential information intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message Is not the intended recf pient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemrnation, r copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please inmediately notify vs by telephone and return the original message to us 
At the abave address vis the U.S. Postal Service, Thank You, 

: . ————   
  

  

  
  

  
    

407 dOYEN bcicl NON 66-E2-0NY 
  hme 2161289202 ‘ON Xb  



   
"3Iodd 21£1289202 
08.23 /88 MON 13: AX 

he 
MON 13:19 FAX @: 4953 _ FERGUSON STEIN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 

P.O. BOX 25670 
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27611    

CLERK'S OFFICE % 

TELEPHONE: (913) 856-4370 

FAX: (919) 856-4160 

        

FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL 
  

2:81:66: £2 on 

J188564168 P.@1.25 

TO: Rd 1ns0n Euere t/Machn Gee Mare Smiley Adam Stein 
FROM: JDhe. Skinner 

MESSAGE: 

8 Pag— ove yn Cromoche 

PEGE page orcdlr in Beh 

NUMBER OF PAGES SENT: 2 (Including Cover) 

  
  

10/80 'd ¢1€1¢8920¢ ‘ON Xv4d 

  

407 dJ96N bé:cl NON 66-E2-0NY



66. C2 NY 
- . 

: 1 p@Q 398d 2121289282 » 42:5 08/23/99 MON_13:20 FAX @: 4953 FERGUSON STEIN @oos . NS AMAD Wier NE 
S1985641A0 P.02.05 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION 

No. 5:97-CV-750-B0(3) 

JACK DALY, et al., 
Plaineiffs, 

) 
) 
) 

v, 
) DRDE R 
) LARRY LEAKE (as Chairman of ) 

the State Board of Elections), ) ot 3). 
) 

Defendants. ) 

The court has Pending before it a motion by the defendants to 
withdraw the metion to consolidate. The court requests the parties 
to provide the court with a status report of the readiness of thig 
dase within ten days from the date of this order. Thig should 
include a forecast by the parties of the timing and scope of 
discovery and other pretrial Preparations, the Parties’ estimate of 
the time which would be involved in trial, and the parties’ present 
edpectalion of a date at whieh they would be ready for trial. 

ENTERED at the direction of the court. 

this 90 gay or August, 1998. 

  Nee W. BOYLE 
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE EASTERN DISTRICT op NORTH CAROLINA 

407 dOWeN bc:cl NOW 66-E2-9NY 
  

L0/b0 'd ¢1€128920¢ ‘ON Xvd  



(2:€1 66. £2 9NY 2°39Hd 2181289202 a gE » Yoni 82 08/23/99 MON 13:20 FAX 967 4933... rr 1 FERGUSON STRIN 9198564160 HL 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION FILED 
No. 4:96-CV-104-BO(3) Ale 2 3.1999 

DAVID W. DANIE K Ug DISTRICT AR E DIST. N CAROLINA 

MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al, 
PlaintifYs, 

Vv. 

JAMES B. HUNT, in his official capacity 
as Governor of the State of North Carolina, 
etal, 

Defendants. 

and 

ALFRED SMALLWQQOD, et al., 
Defendant-Intervenors, 

"
e
t
 

N
a
 

e
t
 

N
o
 

w
r
 

N
o
 

N
t
 

n
t
 

M
t
 

a
t
 
N
t
 

e
k
 

a
t
 

o
r
 

    
  

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Digselve Stay, Schedule 
Discovery, and Expedite Trial, Defendants and Defendant-Intervenars join Plaintiffs’ Motion. 
The parties have also filed a Proposed Discovery Plan. Defendants have filed 2 Withdrawal of 
Motion to Consolidate this case with Daly v. Leake, No. 4:97-CV-75 0-BO(3). 

Proceedings before this Court ip this matter have been stayed pending action by the 
United States Supreme Court, Op May 17, 1999, the United States Supreme Court remanded 
this matter to this Court for trial. See Hunt v. Cromartie. 526 US. — 119 S.Ct. 1545 (1999). 

The parties now seek the dissolution of this Court's stay of proceedings in this case. The 
parties also seek an expedited trial and have filed a proposcd discovery order. 

This Court's stay in this matter will be dissolved. This matter js sct for trial at this Court's 
November 1, 1999 term, in Raleigh, North Carplina. Discovery in this case will proceed in 
accordance with the schedule described below. 

  

ee a ——— 

407 dJUoN G2:2l NOW 66-E2-DNY 10/40 'd ¢1€1¢B8920¢ ‘ON Xu  



   

  

L2:L1 B65. £2 BNY 390 398d 21£1283202 
08/23/99 MON 13:20 FAX 967 4983 _ __ ._ FERGUSON STEIN a Zoos ve 9198564162 P.p4.ps 

The parties wll complete discovery in this matter by October 4, 1999. The partes will 
be allowed until August 31, 1999, to join additional Parties or amend pleadings. Plaintiffs may 
serve up fo fly Interrogateties. Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors may serve up ta fifty 
interrogatories, which shall be apportioned between Defendants and Defendants Intervenors as 
they may agree and, absent agreement, divided equally, 

Plaintiffs may notice up ta fifteen depositions of nom-eXpert witnesses, and the 
Defendants, including Defendant-Intervenars, may notice up to fifleen depositions of non-expert 
witnesses, which shall be apportioned between Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors as they 
may agree and, absent agreement, divided equally. The parties must identify expert witnesses 
and serve their Rule 26 reports on or before September 10, 1999. The parties shall be allowed 
until September 22, 1999 to make a goed faith effort to disclose the identity of al) tria] witnesses 
together with a brief statement of what 5 party proposes to establish through each witness 
testimony. 

All motions, except those relating to the admissibility of evidence at trial, are to be filed 
on or before October 18, 1999. The Court notes and ACCEPTS the stipulations agreed to by the 
pastivs | in their Proposed Discovery Plan. Also, as outlined in the parties’ Proposed Discovery 
Plan, reasonable access to the public terminal of the North Carolina General Assembly's 
redistricting computer system will be Provided to eounsel for Plaintiffs or their experts under the 
supervision of the Legiglative Automated Services Division during regular business hours. 

Therefore, this Court hereby DISSOLVES its stay of proceedings in thiy case, 
SCHEDULES discovery as described above, snd scts this case for ria] before the undersigned 
panel duning the Court's November 1, 1999 term in Raleigh, North Carolina. The Court will 
accept Defendants’ Withdrawal] of Motion to Consolidate this matter with Daly v_Le = Leake, and wil 

2 

407 dOUON G2:¢l NOW 66-E2-ONY 
  
  

10/980 'd ¢1€1¢B8920¢ ‘ON Xv 

 



£2. ong Ud 21£1289202 82:1 B66. 
723799 MON 13:20 FAX 967 4953 ,. FERGUSON STEIN Zuoe 

9186-8416Q@ FP. oS5/05 

  

accordingly DENY Defendants’ pending Motion to Consolidate. 

SO ORDERED. 

This ___ day of August, 1999, 

SAM J. ERVIN, III 
United States Circuit J udge 
TERRENCE W. BOYLE 
Chief United States District Judge 
RICHARD I. VOORHEES 
Chief United States District Judge 

  

By: y AAA { nl 

TERRENCE W. BOYLE / CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT fUDGE 

TOTAL P. 2S 

  

  

407 dOUoN GZ:cl NOW 66-E2-9NY 10/10 'd ¢1€1289¢0¢ ‘ON X94

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top