Index to Hardback 11

Public Court Documents
January 2, 1990 - January 8, 1990

Index to Hardback 11 preview

4 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Index to Hardback 11, 1990. 5ec033da-247c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/05fdc0d1-c66b-4e07-99b0-aa8d7cb11c8b/index-to-hardback-11. Accessed November 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    * » 

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#11 

  

  

Page 1 
Date No. 
  

  

1/2 Fed. Ex. Ltr. to Clerk fr Keyes w/ Harris 
County District Judge Wood’s Notice of 
Appeal 1 

1/2 Ltr fr Deputy Clerk Neil to Ganucheau 
with copies to Attys of Record, K.Long, 
J. Smith, ct reporter and Judge Bunton 
w/certified copy of Notice of Appeal 
and docket entries, Extra copy of ltr. 2 

1/2 FAX to S.Ifill fr S.Finkelstein re: 
Order signed by Bunton 3 

1/2 Ltr. to Garrett, Rios, Finkelstein, 
Hicks, Oden, Richards, Ifill, McDonald, 
Smith, Clements, Cummingham, Wood, 
Cloutman, Pullen, Wheatley w/Judge F. 
Entz’s Notice of Appeal 4 

1/3 Fed Ex. Ltr. to Ganucheau fr Godbey w/ 
Emergency Application for Stay 5 

1/3 Ltr. fr Ganucheau w/Harris County 
District Judge Sharolyn Wood’s Notice 
of Appeal 6 

1/3 Ltr. Clerk Neil fr S.Finkelstein w/ 
Correction of Clerical Erros 7 

1/3 Ltr. to Mattox fr Clements requesting 
that attorney general take a full stay 
of all aspects of the federal court’s 
interim plan 8 

1/4 Ltr. hand delivered to Clerk fr R. Hicks 
w/ Motin to Alter Order of 1/2/1990 9 

1/4 Ltr. hand delivered to Clerk Ganucheau 
fr E Keyes w/dft-intervenor Harris 
County District Judge Wood’s Emergency 
Application for Stay, Harris County Dist. 
Judge Wood’s Petition for Expedited 
Permission to Appeal, etc., Motion to 
Consolidate, Judge Wood’s Exhibit List, 
Volumes I and II. 10 

1/4 Ltr. to Ganucheau via telecopy fr R.Hicks 

 



  

stating that the disposition of motions 
will not be decided until early next week 11 

 



LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#11 
  

Ltr. to J.Mattox fr G.S. Bayoud opposing 
proposed agreed order, etc. and Ltr. to 
J.Mattox fr Bayoud re conversation 
with R.Hicks filing of Motion for Stay 

FAX fr G.McDonald w her resume, article 

by D.Graves "Political Shots Fired over 
Plan for District Judicial Elections", 
"Key Points of Judicial Plan", "Judges 
Work on Election Plans in Wake of Judi- 
cial Redistricting" by Berta Delgado fr 
Austin American-Statesman 12/20/89, "New 
Judicial Compromise Promises to Muddle 
Races" - Opinion by Arnold Garcia Jr. 

Emergency Application for Stay 

Secretary of State George Bayoud’s 
Emergency Application for Stay; 
Defts’s Notice of Designation of 
Independent Counsel- Appeals Ct.; 
Notice of Appeal by Deft. G.S. Bayoud; 
Deft’s Notice of Designation of 
Independent Counsel to Judge Bunton 

Pltfs’ Response to State Defts’ Motion 
to Alter 

Notice of Appeal fr G.S. Bayoud, etc. 

Ltr. to Atty. Gen. Mattox fr P. 
Wassdorf, Assistant Sec. of State 
correcting typographical error 

FAX fr S.Finkelstein w pages 8, 9, & 16 

FAX -Joint Motion of Pltf-Apls and Dallas 
Pltfs-Intervr-Aplee to Dismiss for 
Want of Jurisdiction Requests for Stay 
of Entz and Wood fr San Antonio 

Ltr. to Judge Bunton fr S.Ifill stating 
pltfs Houston Trial Lawyers Association 
will not opposte Attrny Gen. Mattox’ Motion 
to Alter the Order of 1/2/90 21  



  

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#11 
  

  

  

Page 3 
Date No. 

1990 

1/6 PAX to J.Hollis fr S.1Ifill 1tr to 
Judge Bunton stating pltfs Houston Trial 
Lawyers Association will not oppose Attrny 
Gen. Mattox’ Motion to Alter the 
Order of 1/2/90 22 

1/6 Fed Ex. Ltr. to Ganucheau fr R. Hicks 
w/Tex Atty Gen.’s Motion to Strike 23 

1/6 Fed Ex. Ltr. to Clerk of Ct. fr R.Hicks 
w/ Motion to Strike. Supporting Memo, 
and proposed order 24 

1/8 FAX Judge Bunton’s ltr. to G.McDonald 25

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.