U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear South Carolina Protest Appeal
Press Release
May 14, 1962

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear South Carolina Protest Appeal, 1962. ad1745e8-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/06c2401e-97d6-4947-92c4-08fc91521653/us-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-south-carolina-protest-appeal. Accessed October 10, 2025.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND TO COLUMBUS CIRCLE «+ NEW YORK19,N.Y. ¢ JUdson 6-8397 DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY President Director-Counsel Associate Counsel S25 U. S. SUPREME COURT AGREES TO HEAR SOUTH CAROLINA PROTEST APPEAL May 14, 1962 NEW YORK - The United States Supreme Court decided this morning to hear an appeal of 187 Negro students who were convicted last year in an anti-segregation demonstration at Columbia, S. C, Though not a sit-in, the Columbia case is the result of a demon- stration arising out of the Negro southern sit-in movement. "We are gratified that the Court has agreed to hear this case and the important civil rights issues it raises," said Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund today. Mr. Greenberg said he expects the Court to hear the case next November or December. Briefs are due August 25. The Negro students were arrested on March 2, 1961, when they marched in orderly manner on the State House grounds in Columbia. The demonstration was designed to attract the attention of state officials and the State Legislature, which was in session. When police requested the group to leave, the students refused and were arrested for “breach of the peace." The warrants charged that the demonstration impeded the lawful flow of traffic, and may have incited members of watching crowd to violence. The Legal Defense Fund petition to the U. S. Supreme Court argued that there was no evidence of violence, threatened violence, or inter- ference with traffic at the time of the arrests. Most of the students who participated in the demonstration were from Benedict College in Columbia, but many high school students were also involved. The Columbia case will be the first Negro protest demonstration appeal to come before the Supreme Court since the convictions of sixteen Negro students were reversed for sit-ins in Baton Rouge, La. in December 1961. NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys representing the students are Matthew J, Perry and Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., of Columbia, S. C., Donald James Sampson of Greenville, S. C., and Jack Greenberc, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit, III, and Michael Meltsner of New York City. ==<0-<=