U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear South Carolina Protest Appeal
Press Release
May 14, 1962
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear South Carolina Protest Appeal, 1962. ad1745e8-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/06c2401e-97d6-4947-92c4-08fc91521653/us-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-south-carolina-protest-appeal. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
TO COLUMBUS CIRCLE «+ NEW YORK19,N.Y. ¢ JUdson 6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY
President Director-Counsel Associate Counsel
S25
U. S. SUPREME COURT AGREES TO HEAR
SOUTH CAROLINA PROTEST APPEAL May 14, 1962
NEW YORK - The United States Supreme Court decided this morning to hear
an appeal of 187 Negro students who were convicted last year in an
anti-segregation demonstration at Columbia, S. C,
Though not a sit-in, the Columbia case is the result of a demon-
stration arising out of the Negro southern sit-in movement. "We are
gratified that the Court has agreed to hear this case and the important
civil rights issues it raises," said Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel
of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund today. Mr. Greenberg
said he expects the Court to hear the case next November or December.
Briefs are due August 25.
The Negro students were arrested on March 2, 1961, when they
marched in orderly manner on the State House grounds in Columbia. The
demonstration was designed to attract the attention of state officials
and the State Legislature, which was in session.
When police requested the group to leave, the students refused
and were arrested for “breach of the peace." The warrants charged that
the demonstration impeded the lawful flow of traffic, and may have
incited members of watching crowd to violence.
The Legal Defense Fund petition to the U. S. Supreme Court argued
that there was no evidence of violence, threatened violence, or inter-
ference with traffic at the time of the arrests.
Most of the students who participated in the demonstration were
from Benedict College in Columbia, but many high school students were
also involved.
The Columbia case will be the first Negro protest demonstration
appeal to come before the Supreme Court since the convictions of sixteen
Negro students were reversed for sit-ins in Baton Rouge, La. in
December 1961.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys representing the students are
Matthew J, Perry and Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., of Columbia, S. C.,
Donald James Sampson of Greenville, S. C., and Jack Greenberc,
Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit, III, and Michael Meltsner of
New York City.
==<0-<=