Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record or in the Alternative for a Writ of Certiorari to the Fourth Circuit
Public Court Documents
September 3, 1970
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hardbacks. Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record or in the Alternative for a Writ of Certiorari to the Fourth Circuit, 1970. ab6ce05f-2e34-f111-88b4-0022482cdbbc. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/088a3194-9e79-4076-85d1-00d5463a8a95/motion-for-leave-to-supplement-the-record-or-in-the-alternative-for-a-writ-of-certiorari-to-the-fourth-circuit. Accessed June 02, 2026.
Copied!
[||a77dd801-4320-43b9-9d88-3f210e0325e8||] IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
October Term, 1970 :
Nos. 281 and 349
JAMES E. SWANN, et al,
Petitioners,
VS.
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG
BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al,
Respondents.
and
JAMES E. SWANN, et al,
Petitioners and Cross Respondents,
VS.
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG
BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al,
Respondents and Cross Petitioners.
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECOR
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TOTHE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Respondents and cross petitioners respectfully move that the Court
authorize respondents and cross petitioners to supplement the record in
the foregoing appeals now pending in this Court or, in the alternative, that
this motion be treated as a petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and in support thereof, respectfully show
unto the Court as follows:
1. On June 29, 1970, the Supreme Court of the United States
granted certiorari in Case No. 281 and reinstated the order of the District
Court as follows:
iF The petition for writ of certiorari is granted,
provided that the judgment of the Court of Appeals is
left undisturbed insofar as it remands the case to the
District Court for further proceedings, which further
proceedings are authorized, and the District Court's
judgment is reinstated and shall remain in effect
pending those proceedings.
2. Pursuant to the directive of the Court of Appeals as authorized
by the Supreme Court, the United States District Court of the Western
District of North Carolina conducted further hearings commencing on
July 15, 1970, which extended over an eight-day period and culminated
in the two orders of the District Court dated August 3 and August 7, 1970,
which wholly reinstated its order of February 5, 1970, which order formed
the primary basis for the appeal to the Court of the Appeals and the
appeals to the Supreme Court herein.
3. On August 31, 1970, the Honorable Warren E. Burger, Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, set oral argument in
Cases Nos. 281 and 349 for argument on October 12, 1970. In addition,
the order directed the filing of briefs with reference to Case No. 349
and deferred action on the pending cross petition for a writ of certiorari.
The appeal in No. 281 and the cross appeal in No. 349 test the legality
of the District Court's order of February 5, 1970, as reaffirmed by the
District Court in its orders of August 3 and August 7, 1970.
‘ Notice of appeal from the orders of the United States District
Court for the Western District of North Carolina dated August 3 and
August 7, 1970, has been filed by respondents and cross petitioners herein
and the record was docketed in the United States Court of Appeals for the
Fourth Circuit on September 3, 1970, as Case No. 15050.
5. The issues involved in Case No. 281 and 349 are identical to
those pending in the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit as Case No.
15050 and therefore complete resolution of the orders of the District Court
may be resolved only by the Supreme Court.
6. The partial record in this matter now lodged with the United
States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is necessary, proper and
essential for a full consideration of all issues as they exist between the
~ parties in Case Nos. 281 and 349.
7..:1n oadon that the record shall be complete, it is deemed et
desirable by all parties that the complete record, including the proceedings
held by the District Court which culminated in its biden of August 3,
1970, and August 7, 1970, be before this Court. This procedure was
apparently contemplated by the Supreme Court at the time of the granting
of the writ of certiorari in Case No. 281.
WHEREFORE, respondents and cross petitioners respectfully
petition the Court for an order directing the United States Court of Appeals
for the Fourth Circuit in Case No. 15050 to forthwith deliver to the
United States Supreme Court the entire record on appeal from the orders
dated August 3 and August 7, 1970, in the United States Court of Appeals
for the Western District of North Carolina in a case therein entitled
James E. Swann, et al, vs. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education,
et al.
In the alternative, should the Court elect to disallow the foregoing
motion, it is requested that this motion be treated as a petition for writ of
certiorari pursuant to Rule 20 of the United States Supreme Court Rules
and before judgment in the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for
reason that these cases and the supplemental record is of such imperative
2 ® »
)
public importance as to justify the deviation from normal appellate
processes and require immediate settlement in this Court on October 12, |
1970. The issues presented in the case now pending in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit are identical to the issues presented
by Nos. 281 and 349.
Respectfully submitted this : "day of September, 1970,
°
William J. Waggoner
Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges, Odom
and Bigger
1100 Barringer Office Tower
Charlotte, North Carolina
°
“Benjamin. S. Horack
Ervin, Horack and McCartha
806 East Trade Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
Attorneys for Respondents and Cross
Petitioners [||a77dd801-4320-43b9-9d88-3f210e0325e8||]