Lawyers Appeal Dismissal of Suit in Behalf of 4,000 Watts Rioters
Press Release
October 25, 1965

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 3. Lawyers Appeal Dismissal of Suit in Behalf of 4,000 Watts Rioters, 1965. b9c72265-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/09bd36ea-60f5-4303-b1d8-9635dd600a12/lawyers-appeal-dismissal-of-suit-in-behalf-of-4-000-watts-rioters. Accessed April 22, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle New York, 10019 JUdson 6-83 NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund PRESS RELEASE President De. Allan Knight Chalmers FOR RELEASE Monday October 25, 1965 Director-Counsel see ONAWYERS APPEAL DISMISSAL OF “SUIT IN BEHALF OF 4,000 WATTS RIOTERS LOS ANGELES---NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund lawyers and volunteer attorneys for the Los Angeles NAACP Branch today appealed last week's dismissal of their petition in behalf of more than 4,000 persons arrested during the Watts riots. The attorneys filed suit Oct. 8 in California Supreme Court against the Los Angeles Municipal, Juvenile and Superior Ceurts and 21 judges. The Supreme Court transferred the case to the District Court of Appeals, the state's second highest court, which last Monday denied the petition without a hearing. Today, the lawyers asked the Supreme Court to take juris- diction in the case and grant their motion for a hearing. The original petition asked the high court to order the Los Angeles Courts to appoint adequate counsel for those arrested, and nullify any previous court proceedings in which defendants were not adequately represented. The suit charges that the courts neglected their respon- silibity to inquire as to whether the defendants could afford legal counsel, and to appoint counsel when needed. Most of those arrested are being defended by the Public Defender's Office, which is not equipped to handle such a large number of defendants, the civil rights lawyers arque. They maintain that the courts should provide each defendant with a private lawyer of his own choosing if the Public De- fender's Office is judgedincapable of providing adequate counsel. The suit is a class action in behalf of four Negro petitioners "and all others similarly situated." Attorneys for the petitioners are Raymond L. Johnson and Herman T. Smith of Los Angeles, and Leroy D. Clark and C. Stephen Ralston of the Legal Defense Fund's New York staff. .~30- Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487