Decision to Deny Appeal Per Curiam

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Date is approximate.

Topic
- Educational Equity
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
Case
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- ebb272d4-2e34-f111-88b4-7c1e526962fd

Cite this item

Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hardbacks. Decision to Deny Appeal Per Curiam, 1973. ebb272d4-2e34-f111-88b4-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/0a3afc40-070f-4bd3-9a2c-d14e78f8e672/decision-to-deny-appeal-per-curiam. Accessed June 02, 2026.

Copied!

     [||8f422c1b-100b-4c3b-8229-989754bc0415||] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 73-2048 

James E. Swann, et al., 

Appellees, 

versus 

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of 

Education, et al., 

Appellants. 

  

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. James B. 

McMillan, District Judge. 

  

(Argued January 8, 1974. Decided January 15, 1974 

    
Before Haynsworth, Chief Judge, and Winter, Butzner, Russell, 

Field and Widener, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc. 

  

William W. Sturges (Weinstein, Sturges, Odom, Bigger and Jonas; 
William J. Waggoner; Waggoner, Hasty and Kratt on brief) for 
Appellants; Julius L. Chambers (Chambers, Stein, Ferguson and 
Lanning; Jack Greenbert; James M. Nabrit, III, and Norman 
Chachkin on brief) for Appellees.



    
 
 

  
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

  
 
 

 
 

  
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

  

i
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

  
 
 

 
 

 
 

~ 
\ )) ) 

( 

’ 
o CNOC 
~ 

 
 

em . 

 
 

 
 

 
 

  
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

  
 
 

 
 
 

bd aim cl 

  

~ 
- 

 
 

  
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

1-1 

 
 

  
 
 

 
 

 
 

  
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

AN 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 



    

for the 1974-75 school year, which is due to be 

    

be
y either party should desire review in this Court 

    which may be entered by the 

     

  

I p=
 

I 
cd
 

j
=
 

om Q
 n Q, 1 ®) $<
 

fr
os

t 

(D
 

n an expedited appeal should be had and brief 

should be established with the aid of the Clerk of this Court 

  

7” ~ rd, 

without of any letter press printing. For its 

  

= 
’ 

| 

a} 0 () 

       

    promptly, so that all legal 

  

    

    

      

    

  

        

    

: “mmr iliea +1m I vn pm -} ~ 3 oe ode Bry. ny oy , Oo =~ TO "7A - in ample time for the opening of the schools for the 1974-75 

~ TY 
WJ I 8 

. 

In 
CS po 3 le ven van 3 rod <3 Ce Toe. a Wr Since 1t apr that the Board's compl 

Ars 
fe TS 4 v= ref B= EE =k ~~ . £ A ~1 A 17 VV a TA po the District Court's order for the current has 

] ~ Ct 
— soto 

m oted ANT 1 SAM116e 7 th = yo +N +h a OAT tale ScITNnce “ | mooted any 1ssue with respeCt TO thls year anda slnce 2 1 

. 

fo Fl . 

with 0 the school vear 1974 

v we conclude the appeal must be dismi In taking ction 

rots 

% 2 - TT Ty | Yo iia ~~ a ~ 1 ETL 
we 11 € 1( \ Chae merits Of ) I 1E€ regal Pp 

f ion. 

LSOry 
Appeal dismissed [||8f422c1b-100b-4c3b-8229-989754bc0415||]

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Decision to Deny Appeal Per Curiam

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in