Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Elaine Fleeman, Esq. Re Smith v. City of Pine Bluff

Correspondence
August 15, 1986

Cite this item

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Elaine Fleeman, Esq. Re Smith v. City of Pine Bluff preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Legal Department General
Creator
- Lani Guinier and others
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 6821b2bd-e992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Letter from Lani Guinier to Carol Cox (Deputy Clerk) Re: Wilder and Bozeman, 1984. 581e7c39-e792-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/df30f886-69d9-47e0-a0fc-c28791b409a3/letter-from-lani-guinier-to-carol-cox-deputy-clerk-re-wilder-and-bozeman. Accessed April 17, 2025.

Copied!

    Menorandum

January 13, L982

To : Jack Greenberg
Jlm Nabrit
tlapoleon B. WLlliams

F'rom: Lani Guinier

Re : Louisiana Reapportiorunent

I am forwarding local couneelrs proposed budget
for possible littgation challanging the 19BI
Louisiana reapportionment for the Louieiana Houae
and for Section 5 corunents to the Department of
Justj.ce on the House and Congresslonll plans.
The budget is being revlsed because it was based
on an interim lawsuit challenging on one person
one vote grotrnds, a special Louisiana State House
elect,ion from New Or1eans. That particular elect,ion
is in a House district that is now over 60$ b1ack.
There ls a black candidate with a good chance of wj.n-
ning. For political reaaons the ldea of filing an
interim suit was abandoned.

The prospect of flling a complaint challenging the
state-wide reapportionment is good. There are no
immediate plans to proceed quickly, however, since
the state plans are before the Justice iiepartment,
and general elections are a year and a half away.
Nevertheless, I reco[unend that we enter an agreement
with local counsel now to work jointly on the Section
5 comments. LDF should also consider paying the com-
puter expert, Gordon Eenderson, who is working on the
Justice Department cotrments. Mr. Henderson is highJ.y
recommended, very experienced, and extremely reason-
able in his projected, total cost of $3000.00. Any
moneys expended now couLd be recovered eventually as
attorney's fees after litigation, slnce the plans he
prepares would also become the basis for our state-
wide court challenge.

Iet us discuss this on Thursday J.f you have time.

LG/r
Attach

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Elaine Fleeman, Esq. Re Smith v. City of Pine Bluff

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in