Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Elaine Fleeman, Esq. Re Smith v. City of Pine Bluff

Correspondence
August 15, 1986

Cite this item

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Elaine Fleeman, Esq. Re Smith v. City of Pine Bluff preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Legal Department General
Creator
- Lani Guinier and others
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 6821b2bd-e992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys will attempt this week to have a Federal District Court in Jackson, Miss., 1961. ba6cfdcf-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2f9f15f0-fe2d-493c-a874-96aa720e9585/naacp-legal-defense-fund-attorneys-will-attempt-this-week-to-have-a-federal-district-court-in-jackson-miss. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    PRESS RELEASE 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE « NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397 

DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS oa THURGOOD MARSHALL 
Director-Counsel Prosident 

July 10, 1961 

NEW YORK - NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys will attempt this 

week to have a Federal District Court in Jackson, Miss. enjoin the Uni- 

versity of Mississippi from refusing to admit a Negro applicant to its 

second summer session. 

A hearing on a motion for preliminary injunction filed by Legal 

Defense Fund attorneys had been set for July 10, but the hearing may be 

postponed due to illness of a Mississippi state attorney. 

The Legal Defense attorneys hope to have a trial before the Univer- 

sity's second summer session commences July 17, so that its applicant, 

James H. Meredith of Jackson, may begin school then. 

The case is being heard in the Southern District Court of 

Mississippi, Jackson Division, by Judge Sidney C. Mize. The motion for 

preliminary injunction was filed July 1. 

Legal Defense attorneys charge, in their complaint filed May 31, 

that Meredith, who originally applied to the University on January 31, 

1961, 18 being denied admission solely on the grounds of race, and such 

e-nial is miconstitutional. 

A hearing is also set for Monday, July 10, on a Legal Defense Fund 

suit in Jackson which challengés racial segregation of transportation 

terminals and facilities in Mississippi. 

The case will be tried by a three-judge federal District Court con- 

sisting of Judges Elbert P. Tuttle, Sidney C. Mize, and Claude F. Claytcn, 

convened because the Legal Defense Fund complaint charges that state 

segregation of transportation is unconstitutional. A direct appeal to 

the U. S. Supreme Court can follow the decision of the three-judge court. 

The original action, filed on June 9, covers dining; waiting, and 

rest room facilities in bus, railroad and airline terminals. It directly 

affects the rights of Freedom Riders who are currently imprisoned under 

state segregation statutes in Jackson. 

NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys representing the plaintiffs are 

R. Jess Brown of Vicksburg, Miss., Thurgood Marshall, Constance Baker 

Motley and Derrick A, Bell of New York City. 

Sacler

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Elaine Fleeman, Esq. Re Smith v. City of Pine Bluff

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in