Motion for Extension of Time

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Includes Correspondence from Horton to Judge Hammer.

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Sheff v. O'Neill
Case
- Sheff v. O'Neill
U.S. state
- Connecticut
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- f7469704-ab46-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Extension of Time, 1991. f7469704-ab46-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/0ffced44-631a-49d7-9283-5cd9db9b0aee/motion-for-extension-of-time. Accessed July 29, 2025.

Copied!

    MOLLER, HORTON & FINEBERG, P. C. 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

SOCILLETT STREET 

HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06105 

WILLIAM R MOLLER? 
TELEPHONE 

WESLEY W. HORTON 
203) 522-8338 

DAVID L. FINEBERG® 
TELECOPIER 

CHARLES M. RICE, JR 
(203) 728-040l 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS 

ROBERT M. SHIELDS, JR. 

SUSAN M. CORMIER August 29, 1991 

KIMBERLY A. KNOX 

JEFFREY A. HOBERMAN 

*ALSO ADMITTED IN FLORIDA 

BALSO ADMITTED IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Honorable Harry Hammer 

P.O. BOX 325 
Rockville, CT 06066 

Re: Sheff v. O'Neill 

Dear Judge Hammer: 

Enclosed is the motion for extension of time for filing our 

response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment. 

Very truly yours, 

Wesley W. Horton 

WWH:jt 
cc: All Counsel of Record 

 



* 
A
T
T
O
R
N
E
Y
S
 

AT
 
L
A
W
 

M
O
L
L
E
R
,
 
H
O
R
T
O
N
 

& 
F
I
N
E
B
E
R
G
,
 

P.
 

C.
 

  

  

oo) 
~ 

<= 
= 
~ 

Qo 
4 
1 

pr 
- 

LJ 

oe} 
a) 
™ 
2 

oN 
N 
O 

5 
= 
N 

LJ 

-) 
=) 
O 
fo) 

Q S 

Ey 

< 

LJ 

v- 
Ld 

> 

wn 

ir 
por 

Zz 
Q 
aD 

    

CV89-0360977S 

| MILO SHEFF, ET AL 

VS. 

| WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, ET AL 

SUPERIOR COURT 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/ 

NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD 

AUGUST 29, 1991 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 
  

The plaintiffs move for a further extension of time until 

plaintiffs. 

| September 20, 1991 in order to respond to the defendants’ Motion for 

| summary Judgment. The reason for this motion is the need to prepare a 

| proper response to the voluminous papers filed by the defendants, and 

| to accommodate the vacation schedules of some of the attorneys for the 

PLAINTIFFS, MILO SHEFF, ET AL 

The Defendants consent to 

the granting of this motion. 

a 
  

375 *, Whelan, Asst. Attorney General 

  

  

WesleypyW. Horton 
MOLLER, HORTON & FINEBERG, P.C. 
90 Gillett Street 
Hartford, OT 06105 

 



  

    ORDER 

For good cause shown the foregoing is hereby GRANTED/DENIED. 

By the Court, 

  

CERTIFICATION 

g | I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the 

< | following counsel of record on August 29, 1991: 

< | 
P | John R. Whelan John Brittain 
£3 | Diane W. Whitney UCONN LAW SCHOOL 
2 | Asst. Attorney Generals 65 Elizabeth Street 
hi | 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 

Hartford, CT 06105 

Wilfred Rodriguez Martha Stone 

NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES Philip Tegeler 

1229 Albany Avenue CCLU 

Hartford, CT 06112 32 Grand Street 

Hartford, CT 086106 

M
O
L
L
E
R
,
 
H
O
R
T
O
N
 

& 
F
I
N
E
B
E
R
G
,
 

P.
 

C.
 

90
 
G
I
L
L
E
T
T
 

S
T
R
E
E
T
 

« 
H
A
R
T
F
O
R
D
,
 

CT
 
0
6
1
0
5
 

« 
(2

03
) 

5
2
2
-
8
3
3
8
 

= 
J
U
R
I
S
 

NO
. 

3
8
4
7
8
 

Julius L. Chambers Jenny Rivera 
Marianne Lado : Ruben Franco 

Ronald Ellis PUERTO RICAN LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 

| NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 99 Hudson Street 

| 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 

New York, NY 10013 

Helen Hershkoff 

Adam Cohen 

John A. Powell 

ACLU 

132 West 43rd Street 

New York, NY 10013 

  

    

Wesey W. Horton

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Motion for Extension of Time

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in