Plaintiffs' Objection to Interrogatories
Public Court Documents
September 20, 1990
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Objection to Interrogatories, 1990. b11abc02-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/121b5d35-162f-4c1e-88a0-e9647f8970af/plaintiffs-objection-to-interrogatories. Accessed November 02, 2025.
Copied!
-
[=
<
©
@©
oN
~
x
g
w
md
Lid
—
e
©
~
<
©
ot
=]
2
$n
[~
=
—-
[J
©
© ®
A
T
T
O
R
N
E
Y
S
AT
L
A
W
M
O
L
L
E
R
,
H
O
R
T
O
N
&
FI
NE
BE
RG
,
P
C.
80
GI
LL
ET
T
ST
RE
ET
e
H
A
R
T
F
O
R
D
,
CT
06
10
5
e
(2
03
)
52
2-
83
CV8d-0360977S
SUPERIOR COURT MILO SHEFF, ET AL
VS. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/
NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD
WILLIAM A. O/NEILL, ET AL : SEPTEMBER 20, 1990
PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES
Pursuant to §228 of the Connecticut Practice Book, the Plaintiffs
herewith object to the following interrogatories dated July 13, 1990:
8. Using the 1987-1988 data as a base, for Hartford and each of the identified suburban school districts Please specify the number and
percentage of black, Hispanic and white students who must, of a
necessity, attend school in a location outside of the existing school district in which they reside in order to address the condition of
racial and ethnic isolation which now exists in accordance with the requirements of the Constitution.
OBJECTION: Defendants’ interrogatory seeks information from
plaintiffs in regard to the specific remedy that plaintiffs seek if they
prevail in this lawsuit. To that extent, defendants do not seek
information relating to the liability phase but the remedial phase of
this lawsuit. Plaintiffs object on the grounds that such information is premature, and beyond the scope of the lawsuit at this present time.
9. Using the 1987-88 data as a base, for Hartford and each of the
identified suburban school districts please specify the number and
percentage of poor, middle and/or upper class students who must, of
necessity, attend school outside of the existing school district in
which they reside in order to address the condition of socio-economic
isolation which exists in Hartford and the identified suburban school
districts in accordance with requirements of the Constitution. Also
identify the specific criteria which must be used to identify the pool
of poor Hartford students from which those students who would be
reguired to attend schools outside of the existing district in which
they reside must be chose so as to address the condition of
sccio-economic isolation in accordance with the requirements of the
Constitution.
OBJECTION: See objection to Interrogatory 8.
®
A
T
T
O
R
N
E
Y
S
AT
L
A
W
M
O
L
L
E
R
,
H
O
R
T
O
N
&
FI
NE
BE
RG
,
P.
C.
90
GI
LL
ET
T
ST
RE
ET
e
H
A
R
T
F
O
R
D
,
CT
06
10
5
e
(2
03
)
62
2-
83
38
ee
JU
RI
S
NO
.
38
47
8
e
TE
LE
FA
X
72
8-
04
01
9. Using the 1987-88 data as a base, identify the number and
percentage of "at risk! children in the Hartford Public Schools who
must, of necessity, attend school at a location outside the existing
Hartford School District lines in order to address the concentration of
"at risk" children in the Hartford Public Schools in accordance with the
requirements of the Constitution. Also identify the specific criteria
which must be used to identify the pool of Hartford students from which
those who would be required to attend schools in the suburban school
districts must be chosen so as to address the concentration of "at risk"
children in the Hartford Public School.s
OBJECTION: See objection to Interrogatory 8.
20. For each of the above listed interrogatories please provide
the name and address of each person who assisted in the preparation of
the answer to that interrogatory and describe the nature of the
assistance which that person provided.
OBJECTION: To the extent it requires the disclosure concerning
experts who will not testify at trial, it is not provided for under P.B.
§220 (A) (1).
PLAINTIFFS, MILO SHEFF, ET AL
Wh NLS
| Hartford, CT
MARTHA STONE
CONNECTICUT CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
FOUNDATION
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
(203)247-9823
Juris No. 61506
PHILIP D. TEGELER
CONNECTICUT CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
FOUNDATION
32 Grand Street
06106
(203)247-9823
Juris No. 102537
LJ
WESLEY W. HORTON
MOLLER, HORTON &
FINEBERG, P.C.
90 Gillett Street
Hartford, CT 06105
(203) 522-8338
Juris No. 38478
WILFRED RODRIGUEZ
HISPANIC ADVOCACY PROJECT
Neighborhood Legal Services
1229 Albany Avenue
Hartford, CT
(203)278-6850
Juris No. 302827
06102
eo
A
T
T
O
R
N
E
Y
S
AT
L
A
W
90
GI
LL
ET
T
ST
RE
ET
e
H
A
R
T
F
O
R
D
,
CT
06
10
5
e
(2
03
)
52
2-
83
38
e
JU
RI
S
NO
.
38
47
8
ee
TE
LE
FA
X
72
8-
04
01
M
O
L
L
E
R
,
H
O
R
T
O
N
&
FI
NE
BE
RG
,
P.
C.
MARIANNE LADO
RONALD ELLIS
NAACP Legal Defense &
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
(212)219-1900
Pro Hac Vice
HELEN HERSHKOFF
ADAM S. COHEN
JOHN A. POWELL
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
FOUNDATION
132 West 43rd Street
New York, NY 10036
(212)944-9800
Pro Hac Vice
JOHN BRITTAIN
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT
SCHOOL OF LAW
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
(203) 241-4664
Juris No. 101153
JENNY RIVERA
PUERTO RICAN LEGAL DEFENSE
AND EDUCATION FUND
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
¢
A
T
T
O
R
N
E
Y
S
AT
L
A
W
90
GI
LL
ET
T
ST
RE
ET
eo
H
A
R
T
F
O
R
D
,
CT
06
10
5
e
(2
03
)
52
2-
83
38
e
JU
RI
S
NO
.
38
47
8
e
TE
LE
FA
X
72
8-
04
01
M
O
L
L
E
R
,
H
O
R
T
O
N
&
FI
NE
BE
RG
,
P.
C.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to all
counsel of record on September 20, 1990.
Wes . Horton