Plaintiffs' Objection to Interrogatories
Public Court Documents
September 20, 1990

4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Objection to Interrogatories, 1990. b11abc02-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/121b5d35-162f-4c1e-88a0-e9647f8970af/plaintiffs-objection-to-interrogatories. Accessed July 29, 2025.
Copied!
- [= < © @© oN ~ x g w md Lid — e © ~ < © ot =] 2 $n [~ = —- [J © © ® A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W M O L L E R , H O R T O N & FI NE BE RG , P C. 80 GI LL ET T ST RE ET e H A R T F O R D , CT 06 10 5 e (2 03 ) 52 2- 83 CV8d-0360977S SUPERIOR COURT MILO SHEFF, ET AL VS. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/ NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD WILLIAM A. O/NEILL, ET AL : SEPTEMBER 20, 1990 PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES Pursuant to §228 of the Connecticut Practice Book, the Plaintiffs herewith object to the following interrogatories dated July 13, 1990: 8. Using the 1987-1988 data as a base, for Hartford and each of the identified suburban school districts Please specify the number and percentage of black, Hispanic and white students who must, of a necessity, attend school in a location outside of the existing school district in which they reside in order to address the condition of racial and ethnic isolation which now exists in accordance with the requirements of the Constitution. OBJECTION: Defendants’ interrogatory seeks information from plaintiffs in regard to the specific remedy that plaintiffs seek if they prevail in this lawsuit. To that extent, defendants do not seek information relating to the liability phase but the remedial phase of this lawsuit. Plaintiffs object on the grounds that such information is premature, and beyond the scope of the lawsuit at this present time. 9. Using the 1987-88 data as a base, for Hartford and each of the identified suburban school districts please specify the number and percentage of poor, middle and/or upper class students who must, of necessity, attend school outside of the existing school district in which they reside in order to address the condition of socio-economic isolation which exists in Hartford and the identified suburban school districts in accordance with requirements of the Constitution. Also identify the specific criteria which must be used to identify the pool of poor Hartford students from which those students who would be reguired to attend schools outside of the existing district in which they reside must be chose so as to address the condition of sccio-economic isolation in accordance with the requirements of the Constitution. OBJECTION: See objection to Interrogatory 8. ® A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W M O L L E R , H O R T O N & FI NE BE RG , P. C. 90 GI LL ET T ST RE ET e H A R T F O R D , CT 06 10 5 e (2 03 ) 62 2- 83 38 ee JU RI S NO . 38 47 8 e TE LE FA X 72 8- 04 01 9. Using the 1987-88 data as a base, identify the number and percentage of "at risk! children in the Hartford Public Schools who must, of necessity, attend school at a location outside the existing Hartford School District lines in order to address the concentration of "at risk" children in the Hartford Public Schools in accordance with the requirements of the Constitution. Also identify the specific criteria which must be used to identify the pool of Hartford students from which those who would be required to attend schools in the suburban school districts must be chosen so as to address the concentration of "at risk" children in the Hartford Public School.s OBJECTION: See objection to Interrogatory 8. 20. For each of the above listed interrogatories please provide the name and address of each person who assisted in the preparation of the answer to that interrogatory and describe the nature of the assistance which that person provided. OBJECTION: To the extent it requires the disclosure concerning experts who will not testify at trial, it is not provided for under P.B. §220 (A) (1). PLAINTIFFS, MILO SHEFF, ET AL Wh NLS | Hartford, CT MARTHA STONE CONNECTICUT CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 (203)247-9823 Juris No. 61506 PHILIP D. TEGELER CONNECTICUT CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 32 Grand Street 06106 (203)247-9823 Juris No. 102537 LJ WESLEY W. HORTON MOLLER, HORTON & FINEBERG, P.C. 90 Gillett Street Hartford, CT 06105 (203) 522-8338 Juris No. 38478 WILFRED RODRIGUEZ HISPANIC ADVOCACY PROJECT Neighborhood Legal Services 1229 Albany Avenue Hartford, CT (203)278-6850 Juris No. 302827 06102 eo A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W 90 GI LL ET T ST RE ET e H A R T F O R D , CT 06 10 5 e (2 03 ) 52 2- 83 38 e JU RI S NO . 38 47 8 ee TE LE FA X 72 8- 04 01 M O L L E R , H O R T O N & FI NE BE RG , P. C. MARIANNE LADO RONALD ELLIS NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 (212)219-1900 Pro Hac Vice HELEN HERSHKOFF ADAM S. COHEN JOHN A. POWELL AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 132 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 (212)944-9800 Pro Hac Vice JOHN BRITTAIN UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF LAW 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 (203) 241-4664 Juris No. 101153 JENNY RIVERA PUERTO RICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 ¢ A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W 90 GI LL ET T ST RE ET eo H A R T F O R D , CT 06 10 5 e (2 03 ) 52 2- 83 38 e JU RI S NO . 38 47 8 e TE LE FA X 72 8- 04 01 M O L L E R , H O R T O N & FI NE BE RG , P. C. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to all counsel of record on September 20, 1990. Wes . Horton