Supplemental Joint Appendix
Public Court Documents
January 18, 1991
26 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Supplemental Joint Appendix, 1991. 60e1adfd-1b7c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/122d2b8c-efad-4cb1-81a2-fcac42695554/supplemental-joint-appendix. Accessed November 07, 2025.
Copied!
Nos. 90-813, 90-974
Ix Tus [| RECEIVE D
Supreme Court of the ante SS tateBELIVE ERED
OCTOBER TERM, 1990 | APR 151991
| OFFICE OF THE CLERK
HOUSTON LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION, et abt" REME "COURT LS.
Petitioners,
V.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, et al.,
Respondents.
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, et al.,
Petitioners,
V.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, et al.,
Respondents.
On Writs of Certiorari to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT APPENDIX
JuLius LEVONNE CHAMBERS GABRIELLE K. MCDONALD
*CHARLES STEPHEN RALSTON 301 Congress Avenue
SHERRILYN A. IFILL Suite 2050
99 Hudson Street Austin, Texas 78701
Sixteenth Floor (5612) 320-5055
New York, N.Y. 10013
(212) 219-1900 Of Counsel:
MATTHEW & BRANSCOMB
*Counsel of Record for A Professional Corporation
Petitvoners Houston Lawyers’
Association, et al. Attorneys for Houston
Lawyers’ Association, et al.
[Additional Counsel Listed on Inside Front Cover]
PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI FILED
NOVEMBER 11, 1990 IN NO. 90-813, DECEMBER 14, 1990 IN NO. 90-974
CERTIORARI GRANTED JANUARY 18, 1991
*WiLLIAM L. GARRETT RoLANDO L. RiIOS
BRENDA HULL THOMPSON 201 N. St. Mary's, #521
8300 Douglas, Suite 800 San Antonio, TX 78205
Dallas, TX 75225 (512) 222-2102
(214) 369-1952
*Counsel of Record for Attorneys for LULAC, et al.
Petitioners LULAC, et al.
TEXAS RURAL LEGAL AID, SUSAN FINKELSTEIN
INC. 201 N. St. Mary’s, #624
DAvID HALL San Antonio, TX 78205
259 S. Texas (5612) 222-2478
Weslaco, TX 78596
(512) 968-6574
Attorneys for Petitioner Christina Moreno
**EDWARD B. CLOUTMAN III E. BRICE CUNNINGHAM
3301 Elm St. 777 S. R. L. Thorton
Dallas, TX 75226 Dallas, TX 75203
(214) 939-9222 (214) 428-3793
**Counsel of Record for Attorneys for Jesse Oliver, et al.
Petitioners Jesse Oliver, et al.
DAN MORALES J. EUGENE CLEMENTS
MARY F. KELLER (Counsel of Record)
RENEA HICKS EVELYN V. KEYS
(Counsel of Record) PORTER & CLEMENTS
JAVIER GUAJARO 700 Louisiana Street
Office of the Attorney Suite 3500
General Houston, TX 77002-2730
Supreme Court Building (713) 226-0600
1401 Colorado Street
Austin, TX 78701-2548 Attorneys for Respondent
(512) 463-2085 : Judge Sharolyn Wood
Attorneys for Respondent
Attorney General of Texas
SEAGAL V. WHEATLEY ROBERT H. Mow, JR.
(Counsel of Record) (Counsel of Record)
DoNALD R. PHILBIN, JR. HUGHES & LUCE
OPPENHEIMER, ROSENBERG 2800 Momentum Place
KELLEHER & WHEATLEY, 1717 Main Street
INC. Dallas, TX 75201
711 Navarro, Sixth Floor (214) 939-5500
San Antonio, TX 78205 Attorneys for Dallas County
(512) 224-2000 Respondents
Attorneys for Bexar County
Respondents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint
p
m
s
e
e
S
E
E
Ee
ee
S
S
E
E
M
E
E
H
H
L
E
H
R
2a
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS
(LULAC), et al.,
Plaintiffs,
HOUSTON LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION, et al.,
Plaintiff-Intervenors
VS.
CIVIL. ACTION #
MO 88-CA-154
JIM MATTOX, Attorney General of the State
of Texas, et al.,
Defendants
SHAROLYN WOOD, and F. HAROLD ENTZ,
Defendant-Intervenors
PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
I. INTRODUCTION
I. The members of Plaintiffs LULAC, LULAC
COUNCIL #4434 and LULAC COUNCIL #4451 and the
named individual Plaintiffs are Mexican-American and Black
citizens of the State of Texas. They bring this action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1971, 1973, 1983, 1988 to redress a
3a
denial, under color of state law, of rights, privileges or
immunities secured to Plaintiffs by the said laws and by the
Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of
the United States.
2.5 Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that the
existing at large scheme of electing district judges in the
target areas of the State of Texas violates Plaintiffs’ civil
rights in that such method illegally and/or unconstitutionally
dilutes the voting strength of Mexican-American and Black
electors; Plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction prohibiting
the calling, holding, supervising or certifying of any future
elections for district judges under the present at large scheme
in the target areas; Plaintiffs seek the formation of a judicial
districting scheme by which district judges in the target areas
are elected from districts which include single member
districts; Plaintiffs seek costs and attorneys’ fees.
II. JURISDICTION
3 Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. 1343 (3) &
(4), upon causes of action arising from 42 U.S.C. 1971,
1973, 1983, & 1988, and under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth
4a
Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Declaratory relief is
authorized by 28 U.S.C. 2201 & 2202 and by Rule 57,
F.R.C.P.
III. PLAINTIFFS
4, Plaintiff LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN
AMERICAN CITIZENS (LULAC) is a statewide
organization whose members are United States Citizens of
Mexican American and black descent, and are resident
taxpayers of the State of Texas, and are qualified to vote for
district judges in the various counties.
S. LULAC Council No. 4434 is a local organization
whose membership is composed of United States Citizens
most of whom are of Mexican-American and Black descent,
and are resident taxpayers of the State of Texas, and are
qualified to vote for district judges in Midland County.
LULAC Council No. 4451 is a local organization whose
membership is composed of United States Citizens most of
whom are of Mexican-American or Black descent, and are
resident taxpayers of the State of Texas, and are qualified to
vote for district judges in Ector County.
5a
6. Plaintiff CHRISTINA MORENO is a United
States Citizen of Mexican-American descent and is a resident
taxpayer of the State of Texas, and is qualified to vote for
district judges in Midland County.
7 Plaintiff AQUILLA WATSON is a Black United
States Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the State of
Texas, and is qualified to vote for district judges in Midland
County.
8. Plaintiff MATTHEW W. PLUMMER, Sr. is a
Black United States Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the
State of Texas; he is qualified to vote for district judges in
Harris County.
9. Plaintiff JIM CONLEY is a Black United States
Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the State of Texas; he
is qualified to vote for district judges in Bexar County.
10. Plaintiff VOLMA OVERTON is a Black United
States Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the State of
Texas; he is qualified to vote for district judges in Travis
County.
11. Plaintiff WILLARD PEN CONAT is a Black
6a
United States Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the State
of Texas; he is qualified to vote for district judges in Fort
Bend County.
12. Plaintiff GENE COLINS is a Black United States
Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the State of Texas; he
is qualified to vote for district judges in Ector County.
13. Plaintiff AL PRICE is a Black United States
Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the State of Texas; he
is qualified to vote for district judges in Jefferson County.
14. Plaintiff THEODORE HOGROBROOKS is a
Black United States Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the
State of Texas; he is qualified to vote for district judges in
Smith County.
15. Plaintiff ERNEST M. DECKARD is a Black
United States Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the State
of Texas; he is qualified to vote for district judges in Smith
County.
16. Plaintiff MARY ELLEN HICKS is a Black
United States Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the State
of Texas; she is qualified to vote for district judges in
Ta
Tarrant County.
16a. Plaintiff REV. JAMES THOMAS is a Black
United States Citizen and is a resident taxpayer of the State
of Texas; he is qualified to vote for district judges in
Galveston County.
IV. PLAINTIFF INTERVENORS
17.27 sMembers < of “the - HOUSTON: LAWYERS’
ASSOCIATION, ALICE BONNER, WELDON BERRY,
FRANCIS WILLIAMS, REV. WILLIAM LAWSON,
DELOYD T. PARKER, BENNIE McGINTY, JESSE
OLIVER, FRED TINSLEY, JOAN WINN WHITE, and
Members of THE BLACK LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS are
Black United States Citizens and are resident taxpayers of
the State of Texas; they are qualified to vote for district
judges in Texas.
V. DEFENDANTS
18. Defendant JIM MATTOX is the Attorney-
General of the State of Texas, and is the chief law
enforcement officer of the state and as such, is charged with
the responsibility to enforce the laws of the state. Defendant
8a
JACK RAINS is the Secretary of State of the State of Texas,
and 1s the chief elections officer of the state and as such, is
charged with the responsibility of administering the election
laws of the state. Defendants THOMAS R. PHILLIPS,
JOHN F. ONION, RON CHAPMAN, THOMAS J.
STOVALL, JAMES F. CLAWSON, JR., JOE E KELLY,
JOE B. EVINS, SAM M. PAXSON, WELDON KIRK,
CHARLES Jai MURRAY, RAY DD." ANDERSON,
LEONARD DAVIS and JOE SPURLOCK, II are members
of the JUDICIAL DISTRICTS BOARD created by Art. V.
Sec. 7a of the Texas Constitution, and pursuant to Art.
24.941 et. seq. Texas Government Code. They have the
duty to reapportion judicial districts within the State of
Texas,
VI. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
19. District judges are elected either from judicial
districts which are coterminous with and wholly contained
within a county, or from judicial districts which are
composed of several entire counties.
20. In those counties which contain more than one
Oa
judicial district, the present election system is an at large
scheme with the equivalent of numbered places, the majority
rule requirement, and staggered terms.
21. The following counties, which are being
challenged in this lawsuit, elect the following number of
district judges and, according to the 1980 U.S. Census,
contain the following population:
# OF JUDGES TOTAL
COUNTY ELECTED POP,
8.8.
FOP. (%)
BLK
POP. (%) CM.%*
Harris
Dallas
Bexar
Tarrant
Travis
Jefferson
Lubbock
Galveston
McLennan
Fort Bend
Smith
59 2,409,544
36 1,556,549
19 988,800
23 860,880
13 419,333
8 250,938
5 211,65)
S 193,940
4 170,755
3 130,846
4 128,366
369,075(15.3)
154,560( 9.9)
460,911(46.6)
67,632( 7.9)
92.2717.)
10,279( 4.1)
41,428(19.6)
23,557(12.0)
14,988(8.8)
26,656(20.4)
4,037(3.1)
473,698(19.7) 35.0
287,613(18.5) 28.4
69,201(7.0) 53.6
101,183(11.8) 19.7
44,988(10.7) 27.9
70,810(28.2) 32.3
15,780 (7.5) 27.0
36,328(18.5) 30.6
27,254(16.0) 24.7
20,420(15.6) 36.0
28,215(22.0) 25.1
10a
Ector 4: 115,374 24,831(21.5) 5,154 (4.3): 26.0
Midland 3 82,636 12,323(14.9) 7.119.(8.6): 23.35
El Paso,
Hudspeth,
and
Culberson** 11 485,942 282,691(58.2) 18,162 (3.7) 61.9
% Combined Minority
** Eight district judges are elected at large within El Paso County; the
other three are elected at large within the three county area of El Paso,
Hudspeth, and Culberson Counties.
22. The following counties comprise a judicial area
that elects three (3) judges at large: EL: PASO,
CULBERSON, and HUDSPETH. This area contains enough
minorities that are sufficiently geographically concentrated
that if single member districts were created, at least one of
those districts would be able to elect a minority.
23. The above areas elect 197 district judges. Each
area contains enough minorities that are sufficiently
geographically concentrated so that if single member districts
were created, at least one of those districts in each area
would be able to elect a minority.
24. Upon information and belief, in the above named
areas minorities are politically cohesive.
lla
25. Upon information and believe in the above cited
areas, the white majority votes sufficiently as a block to
enable it--in the absence of special circumstances, such as the
minority candidate running unopposed--usually to defeat the
minority’s preferred candidate.
26. Upon information and belief, in the above
challenged areas, the at large election scheme interacts with
social and historical conditions to cause an inequality in the
opportunity of hispanic and/or black voters to elect
representatives of their choice as compared to white voters.
27. Upon information and belief, the following are
the names of the presently sitting judges’ elected from the
above counties:
VOTING RACE/
COURT INIDGE COUNTY PRECINCT ETHNIC
11th Mark Davidson Harris 224° Ww
55th Reagan Cartwright Harris 173 i:
61st Shearn Smith Harris se \%
80th William R. "Bill
Powel Harris 040 WwW
113th Geraldine B.
Tennant Harris 227 WwW
125th Don E. Wittig Harris 118 ¥ W
127th Sharolyn P. Wood Harris 232m yy
129th Hugo A. Touchy Harris 333 WwW
133rd Lamar McCorkle Harris ev Ww
151st
152nd
157th
164th
165th
174th
176th
177th
178th
179th
180th
182th
183th
184th
185th
189th
190th
208th
209th
215th
228th
230th
232rd
234th
245th
246th
247th
248th
257th
262nd
263rd
269th
270th
12a
Alice Oliver
Trevathan
Jack O’Neill
Felix Salazar, Jr.
Pete Solito
Ken Harrison
George H. Godwin
James Brian Rains
Miron A. Love
William T. "Bill"
Harmon
J. Mike Wilkinson
Patricia R. Lykos
Donald K. Shipley
Jay W. Burnett
Robert N. Burdette
Carl Walker, Jr.
Richard W. Millard
Wyatt H. Heard
Thomas H. Routt
Michael T.
McSpadden
Eugene Chambers
Ted Poe
Joe Kegans
A.D. Azios
Ruby K. Sondock
Henry G. Schuble
John W. Peavy, Jr.
Charles Dean
Huckabee
Woody R. Densen
Norman R. Lee
Doug Shaver
Charles J. Hearn
W. David West
Ann Tyrrell
Cochran
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
Harris
441
493
134
217
413
015
116
034
129
456
626
261
567
356
138
056
227
136
148
663
658
222
178
434
305
228
628
034
628
200
351
219
217 Fl
E
F
F
er
C
E
E
s
r
r
V
e
r
s
e
s
f
e
r
s
S
2
2
EI
L
E
E
280th
281st
295th
308th
309th
310th
311th
312th
313th
314th
315th
333rd
334th
337th
338th
339th
351st
14th
44th
68th
95th
101st
116th
134th
160th
162nd
191st
192nd
193rd
194th
195th
203rd
204th
254th
255th
256th
265th
13a
Melinda Furche
Harmon Harris
Louis M. Moore Harris
Dan Downey Harris
Bob W. Robertson Harris
John D. Montgomery Harris
Allen J. Daggett Harris
Bill Elliott Harris
Robert S.
Webb, III Harris
Robert L. Lowery Harris
Robert R. Baum Harris
Eric G. Andell Harris
Davie L. Wilson Harris
Russel T. Lloyd Harris
Jim Barr Harris
Mary Bacon Harris
Norman E. Lanford Harris
Lupe Salinas Harris
John M. Marshall Dallas
Candace Tyson Dallas
Gary B. Hall Dallas
Joe B. Brown Dallas
Joseph B. Morris ~~ Dallas
Frank Andrews Dallas
Anne A. Packer Dallas
Mark Whittington Dallas
Catherine J. Crier Dallas
David Brooks Dallas
Merrill L. Hartman Dallas
Michael J. O’Neill Dallas
Harold Entz, Jr. Dallas
Joe Kendall Dallas
Thomas B. Thorpe Dallas
Richard D. Mays Dallas
Dee Miller Dallas
Don D. Koons Dallas
Carolyn Wright Dallas
Keith T. Dean Dallas
129
297
441
430
518
577
221
200
371
296
183
466
316
432
344
050
113
1174
1203
1123
4418
1227
1129
1176
4418
2277
2242
2266
2260
1185
1171
1103
1148
1176
1227
3302
1122 E
V
E
S
E
E
R
E
S
T
E
E
L
E
R
I
T
E
S
N
E
E
E
T
L
E
T
E
Z
E
E
E
E
E
E
14a
282nd Tom Price Dallas 1202 W
283rd Jack Hampton Dallas N71 WwW
291st Gerry Meier Dallas 1209 SW
292nd Michael E. Keasler Dallas 4406 W
298th Adolph Canales Dallas 1216 ¢H
301st Robert O’Donnell ~~ Dallas 2203 iW
302nd Frances A. Harris Dallas 2222 iW
303rd N. Sue Lykes Dallas 4437 W
304th Harold C.
Gaither, Jr. Dallas 4516 W
305th Catherine J.
Stayman Dallas 22353 iW
330th Theo Bedard Dallas 1185 iW
Crim
Dist. 1 Ron Chapman Dallas 2241 W
Crim
Dist.2 Larry W. Baraka Dallas 4453 B
Crim
Dist.3 Mark Tolle Dallas 1187 W
Crim
Dist.4 Frances J. Maloney Dallas 1145 W
Crim
Dist.5 Pat McDowell Dallas 1162 = WW
70th Gene Ater Ector x w
161st Tryon D. Lewis Ector he Ww
244th Joseph Connally Ector %% Ww
358th Bill McCoy Ector ke Ww
19th Bill Logue McLennan ** Ww
54th George H. Allen McLennanis ¥ ** \%Y
74th Derwood Johnson = McLennan ** w
170th Joe Johnson McLennansii ** Ww
17th Fred W. Davis Tarrant 2052 W
48th William L.
Hughes, Jr. Tarrant 2143 W
67th George Allen
Crowley Tarrant 4095 WwW
96th Jeff Walker Tarrant 3101 WwW
141st Dixon W. Holman Tarrant 2266 WW
153rd
213rd
231st
233rd
236th
297th
322nd
323rd
324th
325th
342nd
348th
352nd
360th
Crim
Dist. 1
Crim
Dist.2
Crim
Dist.3
Crim
Dist.4
142nd
238th
318th
53rd
98th
126th
147th
167th
200th
201st
Sidney C.
15a
Farrar, Ir.
George S. Kredell
Maryellen W. Hicks
William H. Brigham
Albert L. White,Jr.
Everett Young, Jr.
Frank W.
Sullivan, III
Scott D. Moore
Brian A. Carper
Robert L. Wright
Joe Bruce
Cunningham
Michael D.
Schattman
Bruce Auld
V. Sue Koenig
Stephenson
Louis E. Sturns
Lee Ann Dauphinot
Don Leonard
Joe Drago, III.
Pat M. Baskin
Van Culp
Dean Rucker
Mary Pearl
Williams
Jeanne Mourer
Joe Hart
Mace B.
Thurman, Jr.
Bob Jones
Paul R. Davis Jr.
Jerry Dellana
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Tarrant
Midland
Midland
Midland
Travis
Travis
Travis
Travis
Travis
Travis
Travis
4130
2352
1104
3151
1004
1004
3151
4343
2012
1081
1081
3151
3286
3289
4203
1189
1004
1022
205
307
212
237
207
320
256
328
320
324 E
E
F
S
E
R
CE
E
R
E
rE
ES
R
E
EE
EC
E
E
E
E
E
C
R
E
S
250th
261st
299th
331st
345th
353rd
58th
60th
136th
172nd
252nd
279th
317th
Cirm.
Dis. Ct.
10th
56th
122nd
212th
306th
72nd
99th
137th
140th
237th
240th
268th
328th
7th
114th
24 1st
321st
37th
45th
16a
Harley Clark
Peter M. Lowry
Jon N. Wisser
Robert A. Perkins
Scott McCown
Joe Dihrell
Ronald L. Walker
Gary Sanderson
Jack R. King
Thomas A. Thomas
Leonard L.
Giblin, Jr.
Robert P. Walker
James M. Farris
Lawrence Gist
Ed. Harris
Allan Lerner
Henry G. Delchite
Roy C. Engelke
Andrew Z. Baker
Blair Cherry
Thomas L. Olinlye
Cecil G. Puryear
William R.
"Bill" Shaver
John R. McFall
Charles A.
Dickerson
Brady G. Elliott
Thomas O.
Stansbury
W.E."Bill" Coats
Cynthia Stevens
Kent
Joe Tunnell
Ruth Jackson Blake
John Cornyn, III
Carol R. Haberman
Travis
Travis
Travis
Travis
Travis
Travis
Jefferson
Jefferson
Jefferson
Jefferson
Jefferson
Jefferson
Jefferson
Jefferson
Galveston
Galveston
Galveston
Galveston
Galveston
Lubbock
Lubbock
Lubbock
Lubbock
Lubbock
Fort Bend
Fort Bend
Fort Bend
Smith
Smith
Smith
Smith
Bexar
Bexar
3020
3079 J
S
E
g
y
Ef
Sv
EZ
w
s
c
e
s
s
i
r
S
s
s
o
n
s
s
T
R
i
s
R
r
E
Z
E
E
57th
73rd
131st
144th
166th
175th
186th
187th
224th
225th
226th
227th
285th
288th
289th
150th
290th
41st
65th
120th
168th
171st
243d
17a
Charles Gonzales Bexar
Paul Andrew Mireles Bexar
Rose Spector Bexar
Susan Reed Bexar
Peter Michael Curry Bexar
Phil G.
Chavarria, Jr. Bexar
James E. Barlow Bexar
Pat Priest Bexar
Carolyn H. Spears Bexar
John J. Specia, Jr. Bexar
Sid L. Harle Bexar
Mike Machado Bexar
Michael Peden Bexar
Raul Rivera Bexar
Tom Rickoff Bexar
Carleton Spears Bexar
Sharon Sands
Mac Rea Bexar
Mary Ann Bramblett El Paso
Eduardo S. Marquez El Paso
Brunson D. Moore El Paso
Jose Troche El Paso
Peter S. Pecas El Paso
Herbert E.
Marsh, Jr. El Paso
3019
3011
3018
3018
3025
3019
2009
3063
3104
3048
3102
3038
3074
3012
3089
3108
3090
088
kk
013
005
006
093 £f
T
I
E
W
M
E
E
Y
L
L
T
E
T
L
E
L
E
L
E
E
L
T
E
E
E
18a
346th Jose J. Baca El Paso 01H
327th Enrigue H. Pena El Paso 012 H
34th William E. Moody Hudspeth,
Culberson,
El Paso 007: +W
(El Paso County)
205th Sam W. Callan Hudspeth,
Culberson,
El Paso 074 WwW
(El Paso County)
210th Sam M. Paxson Hudspeth,
Culberson,
El Paso 011 LW
(El Paso County)
*W-White **This information is being gathered
B-Black
H-Hispanic
VII. CAUSES OF ACTION
28. The present at large scheme of electing district
judges, in the targeted areas, intentionally created and/or
maintained with a discriminatory purpose, violates the civil
rights of Plaintiffs by diluting their votes, in violation of the
United States Constitution and/or,
29. The present at large scheme of electing district
judges, in the targeted areas, results in a denial or
abridgement of the right to vote of the Plaintiffs on account
of their race or color in that the political processes leading
19a
to nomination or election of district judges are not equally
open to participation by Plaintiffs in that they have less
opportunity than other members of the electorate to elect
candidates of their choice, in violation of Section 2 of the
Voting Rights Act.
VIII. IMMUNITIES
30. Qualified and absolute immunity do not protect
the Defendants because Plaintiffs seek only injunctive and
declaratory relief and attorneys’ fees. Furthermore, absolute
immunity does not protect Defendants because they do not
act in any of the capacities which receive immunity at
common law. The Defendants are not entitled to Eleventh
Amendment immunity because Plaintiffs seek only injunctive
and declaratory relief and attorneys’ fees.
IX. EQUITIES
31. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law other
than the judicial relief sought herein, and unless the
Defendants are enjoined from continuing the present at large
scheme, Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed by the
continuing violation of their statutory and constitutional
20a
rights. The illegal and unconstitutional conditions
complained of preclude the adoption of remedial provisions
by the electorate. The present electoral scheme is without
any legitimate or compelling governmental interest and it
arbitrarily and capriciously cancels, dilutes and minimizes the
force and effect of the Plaintiffs’ voting strength.
XX. ATTORNEYS FEES
32. In accordance with 42 U.S.C. 1973-l(e) and
1988, Plaintiffs are entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’
fees as part of their costs.
XI. PRAYER
33, WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED,
Plaintiffs pray that Defendants be cited to appear and answer
herein; that a declaratory judgment be issued finding that the
existing method of electing district judges is unconstitutional
and/or illegal, null and void; that the Defendants be
permanently enjoined from calling, holding, supervising or
certifying any further elections for district judges under the
present at large scheme; that the Court order that district
judges in the targeted counties be elected in a system which
21a
contains single member districts; adjudge all costs against
Defendants, including reasonable attorneys’ fees; retain
jurisdiction to render any and all further orders that this
Court may from time to time deem appropriate; and grant
any and all further relief both at law and in equity to which
these Plaintiffs may show themselves to be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,