Wilder v. Lambert Appellee's Response to Appellant's Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in the Court of Appeals

Public Court Documents
July 18, 1984

Cite this item
Wilder v. Lambert Appellee's Response to Appellant's Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in the Court of Appeals preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Bozeman & Wilder Working Files. Wilder v. Lambert Appellee's Response to Appellant's Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in the Court of Appeals, 1984. 7b4d8dc3-f092-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/12d7e703-bea0-473e-b6c9-1b274aa0851e/wilder-v-lambert-appellees-response-to-appellants-motion-to-stay-further-proceedings-in-the-court-of-appeals. Accessed April 16, 2025.

    Copied!

    oa
IN TIIE

UVITD STEtrES @T'FT OF APPEATS

TDR TIIE

E;EVENftI CIRCTIIT

JULIA P. WILDER,

Petitioner-
Appel lee ,

vs.

BALON M. LAIiIBERT, €t aI.,
Respondents-Appe 1 I ants .

No. 84-7287

APPELLEE!S RESPONSE TO APPELLANTIS
MOTION TO STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appellee Julia P. Wilder hereby notifies this Honorable

Court that on July 13, 1984 the district court denied appellants-

respondents' Motion for Relief from Judgment. A copy of said

order and memorandum opinion are attached. AIso attached j-s a

copy of petitionerrs Amendment to Petition l{unc Pro Tunc, sub-

mitted on July 18, L984 for filing in the district court pursuant

to the July 13, 1984 District Court Order. Appellee respectfully

moves this Court to deny appellantrs motion to stay further pro-

ceedings in the Court of Appeals in that the asserted basis for

the motj-on has been made moot by the district court's Order of

July 13, 1984, and petitioner/appelIee's nunc pro tunc amendment.

Appellee further requests that this case be promptly calendered for



oo
briefing, consideration and

99 Hudson Street
16th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10013
(2t21 2L9-1900

VAMETTA PENN DURANT
639 MarthaStreet
Montgom€ryr Alabama 36104

Attorneys for Fetitioner-
Appellee

Certificate of Servi-ce

This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of

the foregoing Appelleers Response to Appellantrs llotion to Stay

Further Proceedings in the Court of Appeals upon:

P. M. Johnston, Ese.
Attorney Generalrs Annex
669 South Lawrence Street
Montgom€ry, Alabama 36104

via United States mail, postage prepaid.

This 18th day of Ju1y, L984.

Attorney for Fetitioner-
Appellee

decision in Appeals.

-2-

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top