Letter from Attorney General Kelley to Judge Roth RE: Defendants' Motion for Extension

Public Court Documents
August 7, 1972

Cite this item
Letter from Attorney General Kelley to Judge Roth RE: Defendants' Motion for Extension preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Letter from Attorney General Kelley to Judge Roth RE: Defendants' Motion for Extension, 1972. 750e406f-53e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/13b54787-8cfa-4678-bf03-e12818e0b6e9/letter-from-attorney-general-kelley-to-judge-roth-re-defendants-motion-for-extension. Accessed November 28, 2025.

    Copied!

    STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

L eon  S. C o h an  
Deputy Attorney General

F R A N K  J. K E L L E Y
A T T O R N E Y  G E N E R A L

LANSING 
4 8 9 1 3

August 7, 1972

Hon. Stephen J. Roth 
United S ta tes  D i s t r i c t  Judge 
600 Church S t r e e t  
F l in t ,  Michigan 48502

Re: Bradley v M i l l ik e n

Dear Judge Roth:

Enclosed p lease  f in d  s ta te  de fendants ' 
motion f o r  ex tens ion  o f  time in  which to  f i l e  ob je c t io n s  
as suggested by the Court o f  Appeals in  i t s  order o f 
August 7, 1972. P l a i n t i f f s  have concurred in  th is  motion 
to  the ex te n t  that they do no t o b je c t  to  extending the 
time f o r  f i l i n g  o b je c t io n s  to  10 days a f t e r  August 24, 
1972, assuming th a t  the s tay  order o f Ju ly 20, 1972 has 
no t been vaca ted .

The press o f  business preven ted  con tac t in g  
counsel f o r  the o ther  p a r t ie s  w ith  re sp ec t  to  th is  
motion, although we are informed by Mr. Saxton 's  o f f i c e  
th a t  a l l  counsel w ith  the excep tion  o f  Mr. Roumell and 
Mr. R itch ie  were agreeab le  to  h is  request f o r  an ex tens ion  
to  f i l e  o b je c t io n s .  We understand th a t  Mr. Roumell took 
no p o s i t io n  and Mr. R itch ie  ob jec ted  to  h is  request.

We would apprec ia te  the Court a c t in g  upon th is  
motion w ithou t hearing  in  l i g h t  o f  the r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s  
imposed by the Court o f  Appeals to  f i l e  our b r i e f  and 
j o in t  appendix by August 14, 1972.

S in c e re ly  yours,

FRANK J. KELLEY 
A tto rney  General .

, .

' Eugene Krasicky ' f
A ss is ta n t  A tto rney  General

cc : A l l  Counsel o f  Record

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.