Defendants' Motion for Recusal
Public Court Documents
November 14, 1980
1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Defendants' Motion for Recusal, 1980. 3bdd4aba-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1539da60-c244-4bf2-a674-2697f693fe5c/defendants-motion-for-recusal. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
® “ 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WILEY L. BOLDEN, et al., §
Plaintiffs, §
vs. Ss CIVIL ACTION NO. 75-297-P
CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, §
et al.,
: §
Defendants. 2
§
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECUSAL 5
Since this court, the Honorable Virgil Pittman presiding, has
previously determined in its order of October 21, 1976, that Plaintiffs
had proved that the City of Mobile's at-large form of government |
was being maintained for the purpose of discriminating against black
voters, and since this crucial issue must now be again determined,
fairness dictates that the issue be resolved by a judge who has not
previously reached a conclusion on the subject. Accordingly, defendants
respectfully move that the Honorable Virgil Pittman recuse himself
from any further participation in the above-styled cause.
i] A / CBr Sf
C. B. ARENDALL, JR. 7
Attorney for Defenda
City of Mobile, et al.
Lote. Ce Saal htt ie
WILLIAM C. TIDWELL, III
Attorney for Defendants
City of Mobile, et al.
DEFENDANTS RESPECTFULLY REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT.
OF COUNSEL:
HAND, ARENDALL, BEDSOLE, GREAVES & JOHNSTON |,
Post Office Box 123 2s
Mobile, Alabama 36601
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I do hereby certify that I have on this | ¢+Saay of November, 1980,
served a true and correct copy of the foregoing ng pleading on counsel for
all parties of record by placing same in the United States. mail, properly
addressed and first class postage prepaid. ~~
Yh Cr 3 pias