Defendants' Motion for Recusal
Public Court Documents
November 14, 1980

1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Defendants' Motion for Recusal, 1980. 3bdd4aba-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1539da60-c244-4bf2-a674-2697f693fe5c/defendants-motion-for-recusal. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
® “ 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILEY L. BOLDEN, et al., § Plaintiffs, § vs. Ss CIVIL ACTION NO. 75-297-P CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, § et al., : § Defendants. 2 § DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECUSAL 5 Since this court, the Honorable Virgil Pittman presiding, has previously determined in its order of October 21, 1976, that Plaintiffs had proved that the City of Mobile's at-large form of government | was being maintained for the purpose of discriminating against black voters, and since this crucial issue must now be again determined, fairness dictates that the issue be resolved by a judge who has not previously reached a conclusion on the subject. Accordingly, defendants respectfully move that the Honorable Virgil Pittman recuse himself from any further participation in the above-styled cause. i] A / CBr Sf C. B. ARENDALL, JR. 7 Attorney for Defenda City of Mobile, et al. Lote. Ce Saal htt ie WILLIAM C. TIDWELL, III Attorney for Defendants City of Mobile, et al. DEFENDANTS RESPECTFULLY REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT. OF COUNSEL: HAND, ARENDALL, BEDSOLE, GREAVES & JOHNSTON |, Post Office Box 123 2s Mobile, Alabama 36601 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby certify that I have on this | ¢+Saay of November, 1980, served a true and correct copy of the foregoing ng pleading on counsel for all parties of record by placing same in the United States. mail, properly addressed and first class postage prepaid. ~~ Yh Cr 3 pias