Plaintiffs' Sixth Request for Production of Documents with Notice of Service and Certificate of Service

Public Court Documents
September 15, 1992

Plaintiffs' Sixth Request for Production of Documents with Notice of Service and Certificate of Service preview

6 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Hardback Index #2, 1991. 5c842f15-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d02fe4a4-6ebf-462e-b2ae-85bca499386e/hardback-index-2. Accessed July 29, 2025.

    Copied!

    Date   

7/8/91 

7/8/91 

7/8/91 

7/11/91 

8/29/91 

9/20/91 

MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL 
Case # 2207-02 H/B #2 

Contents   

Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ 
Motion for Summary Judgment and Supporting 
Materials PArl 12 ec cvivcsvovinessveses . aa e'y 

(Part 1) Contains the defendants’ discus- 
sion of the case and arguments 
Of 1aW .enevvs desis rs uns nan ninn 

Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ 
Motion for Summary Judgment and Supporting 
Materials Part 2 (Exhibits) 

Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs’ Amended Res- 
ponses To Defendants’ First set of Interroga- 
tories, 2/19/91 (44 DAGES) eve ev vos evasion sse 

Exhibit 2 - Plaintiffs’ Objection to 
Interrogatories, 9/20/90 (4 pages) 

Exhibit 3 - Affidavit of Gerald N. 
Pirozzi {2 DAGES) ve evs vssnsinesvenrvevsnnns 

Exhibit 4 - Affidavit of Robert Brewer 
(2 pages) with attachment (148 pages) 

Exhibit 5 - Affidavit of Elliott 
Williams (2 pages) with 4 attachments 
(5,6,11 and 22 pages respectively) ..... 

Exhibit 6 - Affidavit of G. Donald 
Ferree, Jr. (2 pages) with two attachments 
(2 and 9 pages respectively) .ceeeeeeeans 

COrtifiCation cece ienscvvnvimes vee $iviaie eine 

Motion for Summary Judgment ...cecscecees 

Motion for Extension of Time & Order ... 

Letter to Hon. Harry Hammer from Wesley W. 
Horton enclosing for filing: 

Motion for Extension of Time ....«. 

Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to 
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment ... 

) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 

V
a
s
”
 

N
s
”
 

N
s
’
 

N
a
s
’
 

N
a
i
?
 

a
k
’
 

w
i
 

w
k
’
 

w
i
t
’
 
N
k
’
 

A
k
’
 

w
a
t
?
 

w
t
?
 

w
i
t
’
 

w
t
’
 

"
k
t
 

a
t
 

w
w
w
’
 

—
—
t
®
 

o
w
’
 

V
t
”
 

N
a
”
 

V
a
”
 

“
u
e
”

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top