Findings of Fact and Recommendations
Public Court Documents
July 21, 1970
8 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Findings of Fact and Recommendations, 1970. 2f86eb61-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/193be017-16d7-42c7-92d1-ccbfb89707de/findings-of-fact-and-recommendations. Accessed November 21, 2025.
Copied!
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF N Si N1SSISSIPP] | FILED
JUL 22 1970
ROBERT Cc.
BY Pq &s/
Ll
UNITED STATES COURT OF APP /
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT s
DEPUTY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF
VERSUS NOS. 28030 and 28042
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, ET AL, DEFENDANTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF
VERSUS NO. 1120 (W)
NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL
DISTRICT, ET AL, DEFENDANTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In the above styled school desegregation case, consolidats
ed with other school cases, Nos. 28030 and 28042, on the docket |
of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the Natchez Special |
Municipal Separate School District was ordered by the Appellate |
Court on November 7, 1969, to implement not later than December
31, 1969, a desegregation plan prepared and filed by the Office
of Education of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
On December 10, 1969, the Court of Appeals entered an order modify)
ing the provisions of the plan previously ordered into effect
by that Court. After operating its school district for approximate=
ly four months under the modified plan it became apparent to the
school board that further modifications were necessary, and on
April 29, 1970, in accordance with the procedure outlined in the
|
Appellate Court's order of November 7, 1969, the defendant school
board filed its motion for such modifications to correct these
deficiencies:
(A) insufficient capacity to house all resident
students in one zone.
(B) excessive annual shifting of students among
attendance centers to complete their elemen-
tary education.
(C) excessive bussing of students with resulting
high transportation costs.
On June 10, 1970, the United States of America,
plaintiff, filed its response to the school district's proposed
modifications, making no objection to the proposals affecting student assignments on the elementary and junior high level, but
objecting to the defendants' proposed plan for the assignment of
students in high school grades 10-12. On July 2, 1970, a hearing
was held on the proposed modifications and on the issue pertaining,
to the high school grades.
Both parties were represented by counsel. The N.A.A.C.P. | Legal Defense and Educational Fund, amicus curiae, made no : |
appearance.
At the elementary level, the current plan provides for
eleven schools in four zones in the entire district, including
schools inside and outside the municipal limits. No changes are
contemplated in grade assignments in the Montibello Zone, where
there is one school housing grades 1-6, and the Morgantown, Central |
and Washington Zone, where each school offers two consecutive years
of instruction. As to the remaining seven elementary schools, |
located in two zones, the board proposes changes in some grade
assignments as well as zone changes. Because of insufficient capacity to house all students in grades 1-6 in the Northside,
| Carpenter I and Prince Street Elementary School Zone, which house
grades 1-5, the current plan assigns the 6th grade to Braden
Elementary in another zone, approximately two miles from the
Northside School, affecting more than 250 sixth grade students.
In both the Northside and Braden zones, students residing in
those zones are required to attend a total of 4 different schools
in order to complete six years of elementary instruction. The
school board contends that this fragmentary grade structure
interferes with the effectiveness of the non-graded type of
instruction which this school system has employed for several
years, requires excessive busing of 405 students at the elementary
level, and is otherwise educationally unsound. The school board
proposes four zones, where there are now two, the Prince Street
School, serving grades 1-2, to be paired with Northside school, serving grades 3-6, in the Northside and Prince Street Zone;
Carpenter I school, serving grades 1-2, to be paired with Brum-
field, grades 3-6, in the Brumfield and Carpenter I Zone;
Carpenter II school, serving grades 1-2 to be paired with Braden,
grades 3-6, in the Braden and Carpenter II Zone; and the West
school, serving grades 1-6, in the West Zone. This would insure
that elementary students would attend no more than two schools
during their elementary attendance, and will place 405 additional
children within walking distance to their schools.
As to the four junior high school zones, each containing
one school, housing grades 7-9, each school would retain its |
present grade structure of grades 7-9, the only change being to |
the zone line between the Thompson and Montebello Zones to include ih
the Montebello Zone a triangular area presently in the Thompson |
Zone, being that area formed by Liberty Road, D'Evereaux Drive |
and the eastern limits of the municipality. This area is more than
a mile from Thompson, most of it less than a mile from Montebello,
and effects 70 students in that area who would for the most part
be within walking distance of Montebello, whereas they are now
«3
i |
i
+}
{
\
|
|
|
bused to Thompson.
As stated above, the plaintiff offered no objections to
the above proposed modifications, and at the hearing admitted
they are educationally and administratively sound, satisfy
constitutional requirements, and do not affect significantly the
racial composition of any of the schools involved.
Under the HEW plan the assignment of high school students
in grades 10-12 contemplated a division of the entire district into
north and south attendance areas, the Thompson school serving the
| northern area and the Natchez-Adams High School serving the
southern area. The Appellate Court's modification of December
10, 1969, having assigned grades 7-9 to the Thompson school,
established a three-building complex, exclusive of Thompson school, |
for high school students. The 10th grade was assigned to the |
Anchorage School, being larger than Thompson, with a projected
enrollment of 402 whites and 444 blacks for a total of 846; grades
11 and 12 were assigned to the Natchez-Adams High School with a
projected attendance of 685 whites and 712 blacks for a total of
1397. The Vocational-Technical School was designated to serve
the entire district. As a result of the implementation of ‘this |
plan, April 10, 1970, enrollment records show a loss of 522 |
white students in grades 10-12. The school board's proposal is
a frank attempt to recapture these whites, and proposes that the
district be divided into two attendance areas for grades 10-12, |
the Natchez High School, North Campus Zone, formerly Anchorage,
serving grades 10-12 and Natchez High School, South Campus, former- |
ly Natchez-Adams High, serving grades 10-12. The Vocational-
| Technical School would remain serving the entire district.
The school board's objections to the current assignment
of students in these grades are based on administrative and
lp ae
1 | |
educational grounds, as well as on the loss of white students.
Under the fragmented grade structure, tenth grade students from
the southern part of the district travel to the Natchez~Adams
High School and from there transfer to a bus to Anchorage. A
similar situation in reverse exists for llth and 12th grade
students from the northern part of the district to get to Natchez-
Adams High. At the end of each school day, the procedure is
reversed. The proposed modification would eliminate the need
of transferring approximately 600 students from one campus to the
other each day. In the consolidation in 1957 of the Natchez municipal school district with the county district into one
gpecial district, legislative authority was given to permit busing..
Intra-city busing has been assumed at local cost for a student
who lives more than one mile from his assigned school and who is
not entitled to state supported transportation. The school board
contends that the current high school assignment requires excessive,
busing, and that the proposed modifications would eliminate |
transportation for 405 elementary students, 35 junior high and
600 senior high students or a total of 1,075 students each day,
the expense of which is borne by the district. The savings would
|
be calculated on the basis of the average cost of $3.39 per student |
per month for an annual savings of $32,800.00, and the elimination
of twelve additional buses at an initial cost of $36,000.00. Under
the present assignment there is a traffic hazard of 53 buses crossing U. S. Highway 61 at approximately the same time which
would be avoided under the board's proposal. The school board
contends, under the present assignment of transporting students
away from their nearest school they are riding buses against their
will, and that most disciplinary problems have arisen on the buses.
The time involved in busing has detracted from instructional time
5
|
{
|
|
and added extra burdens and time to members of the faculty involved
in supervising staging areas. The board points out that under
the present plan the curricula at neither school has been
sufficient, and that if the board plan is approved, there will be
two complete senior high schools with comparable courses offered
and participation by two schools in athletic programs.
Implementation of the current assignment of a majority
of blacks to both campuses has resulted in a loss of 522 white |
students from the three high school grades as reflected by April
10, 1970, enrollment reports, giving a current percentage of 78%
black and 227% white attendance at the North Campus and 58%. black
and 42% white attendance at the South Campus, Should this assign-
ment continue, the enrollment for the coming term, as projected by
the school board would increase the disparity to 847 black and
167 white attendance at the North Campus, and 24% black and 76% |
white at the South Campus, indicating a strong trend toward re-
segregation of these schools. In substantiating its projected oy
attendance the school board points to five private and parochial
schools in the area, serving grades 1-12 each, with two more
aapss the river in Louisiana. Additionally, the school board,
through its staff andiwing pupil locator maps, undertook to
determine future attendance by conducting pre-school interviews, |
as a result of which the board determined that 121 white 12th
grade students are eligible to attend during the coming session, of!
which only 50 are expected to attend, and that of 190 white 10th
grade students eligible to attend, only 103 are expected, a number |
of these taking special courses at summer school in order to
finish.
At the hearing, plaintiff suggested, in view of the
above outlined objections to the current high school plan, that,
as an alternative, the school board should adopt the original
6
high school plan offered by HEW as it offers a greater racial
mixture than the proposal of the board. Under it the projected
attendance would have assigned 399 whites and 592 blacks to what
is now referred to as the North Campus in grades 10-12, and 695
whites and 544 blacks in grades 10-12 at the South Campus. There
would be negligible administrative differences between the two
plans. . The sole geographical difference between the two plans lies
in the dividing line between the North and South Campus. Defendants
proposed zone line would coincide with that proposed for Thompson
Junior High and elementary zones, and would include in the North Campus all the area north of Franklin Street and D'Evereaux Drive
in the city limits, This campus would serve a large part of the i
black residential area in the city,’ The South Campus would include |
the area south of Franklin Street and D'Evereaux Drive, and ‘include
major white residential areas. For the rural area, the zone {ine
would follow the boundary between county supervisors' districts
4 and 5. Under the HEW plan a small area within the city would |
be included in the North Campus area, with a larger rural area |
outside the city limits. Under the HEW plan the projected enroll-
ment, stated above, would unquestionably offer a greater racial
mixture than is anticipated under the board's proposal. However, |
as the school board points out, the HEW projections on the basis |
of pupil locator maps assumed that all these students would
attend which has not been the case. The current enrollment reports |
show an attendance of 581 blacks and 161 whites in the 10th grade
at the North Campus, and an attendance of 402 whites and 563
blacks in the 11th and 12th grades at the South Campus for a loss |
of 522 white students from che three high school grades since the
implementation of the currently modified plan. Under either the
HEW or the board plan, the North Campus will remain predominantly
black, the difference in the racial percentages being significant-
-F
ly small. The board contends that under the HEW boundary line,
the South Campus will also remain black, whereby under the board
proposal of enlarging the South Campus area within the city,
more whites will return, increasing white attendance and improving
the racial mixture on this campus. As shown above, current
attendance supports the board's view. This district, being in a
section of the state where nearby public schools are rapidly
becoming all black with loss of a proportional part of community
support, has shown that educational principles underlie the board's
proposals, and that they promise to improve the degree of integra-
tion on the South Campus, with little hope under either proposal
to improve the degree of integration on the North Coupuss
This Court finds that the proposals of the Natchez
Special Municipal Separate School Districét appearing in the
board's motion, together with the projected enrollment chdres ad
maps showing proposed boundary changes attached thereto, are
educationally motivated and, on the basis of current and projected
enrollment figures, offer an over all higher degree of racial
mixture than exists under the present plan, and promises to
produce more mixture than under the original HEW high school
assignment as applied to current attendance.
Accordingly, this Court recommends the approval and
adoption of the school board's proposed modifications to the plan
now in effect.
Recommended and signed in duplicate, the Clerk of this
Court being directed to file one signed duplicate in his office
and forward the other signed duplicate to the Clerk of the U. S.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and mail a copy to each
party of record.
7)
4 N
Lovsury a ¥ 3
Vi
& & Fa
[er | re 5 4 PY AN J Wy Fe 2”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
BY
7
a
%
$
x
y
2
©
DATED: