Correspondence from Menefee to Bowers
Correspondence
November 13, 1984
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Correspondence from Menefee to Bowers, 1984. d13b1ce3-c903-ef11-a1fd-6045bdec8a33. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1adb4dea-eed8-403e-b855-e8ca1cec5b6d/correspondence-from-menefee-to-bowers. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
BLACKSHER, MENEFEE & STEIN, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
405 VAN ANTWERP BUILDING
P. O. BOX 1051
MOBILE, ALABAMA 36633
JAMES U. BLACKSHER November 13, 1984 TELEPHONE
LARRY T. MENEFEE (205) 433-2000
GREGORY B. STEIN
Patricia Bowers, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General
234 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Re: Major v. Treen
Dear Patricia:
Please find enclosed the notice of deposition which I discussed
with you on the telephone. First, I wish to confirm that I am
very agreeable to your producing the bills and statements
reflecting the fees paid to and the services rendered by private
counsel in this action. They in all likelihood will satisfy my
inquiry under paragraph 1 of the notice of deposition. I would
like a statement from you concerning the extent to which
Mr.Feldman and any other private attorneys who appeared in this
action have done work for the state of Louisiana or its officials
during the past several years. My inquiry is whether this was
one piece of specialized litigation which Mr.Feldman and others
handled for the state of Louisiana or did he regularly perform
this and other work for the state and its officials, and if so,
give me some reasonable idea of the extent of that
representation, such as the amount of fees billed during 1982,
and perhaps the total number of cases he handled.
As to the second item of inquiry in the deposition, I understand
you may decide to file a motion to quash or other similar
motion. Please let me know and I will be glad to handle that
either in person or by telephone conference with the Court before
the deposition, or you can wait until the deposition, hear the
specific formulation of the questions and state your objection,
and we can th present it to the Court.
wid Nov-29T+
I want to also confirm the deposition of Lani Guinier for 11:00
a.m. E.S.T., at the Washington, D.C. offices of the NAACP Legal
Defense Fund, which are located at 806 15th Street, N.W., Suite
94uv, Washington, D.C. I assume you will make the necessary
Patricia Bowers, Esq.
November 13, 1984
arrangements for a court reporter, etc. As I stated over the
phone, we are proceeding with this deposition without expecting a
prepayment of costs and fees from the state, under the
expectation that it will be a deposition of moderate length,
e.g., two to four hours. If the deposition runs much longer, you
understand that we may bill the state for payment of the fees and
associated expenses.
I have spoken with Stan Halpin and you may depose him on the
morning of Monday, November 26, 1984, in New Orleans. Please let
us know immediately if you wish to do so.
If you wish to take Armand Derfner's deposition, he is located in
Washington, D.C., and if you will promptly notify me, I expect he
can be available under the same conditions as Lani Guinier.
Also enclosed is the redrafted stipulation of fact. I believe it
correctly reflects our agreement. However, if you find any
problems, please let me know. I am disappointed that we cannot
agree to any of the hours or any of the expenses. If your
position on this issue changes, please let me know. If this
draft is acceptable, please sign, file it and send me a copy of
the signed document.
Best regards.
Sincerely,
BLACKSHER, MENEFEE & STEIN, P.A.
Larry T/. Menefee
EnCls.
LTM:pfm
CC: William P. Quigley, Esq.
Steven Scheckman, Esq.
R. James Kellogg, Esq.
Stanley Halpin, Esq.
Lani Guinier, Esq.
Armand Derfner, Esq.