Greenberg, Jack, 1961-1983 - 39 of 56
Photograph
January 1, 1961 - January 1, 1983

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order, 1984. 242d5fdf-d592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/49495053-3939-4475-9031-75e39b70d23a/order. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
UNTTED STATES DISTRICT EASTERN DTSTRICT OF NORTH RALEIGH DIVISION FILED COURT (t Ii r r lg84 CAROLINARICH LEO.NARD, CLERK U, S. DISTRICT COURI E. DIST. NQ. CA& No.8I-803-CIv-5 RALPH GfNGLES, €t aI., Plaintiffs, v. RUFUS L. EDMISTEN, €t dI., De fendants . ORD ER Following the decision of this Court on 27 January 1984 declaring the election of four representatives for House Districr No. 8 (WiIson, Edgecombe and Nash Counties) violative of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, ds amended, 42 U.S.C. S 1973, Ithe Act], the North Carolina General Assembly enacted legislation creating two proposed districts covering the same area, House District No. 8, a three-member district, and House District No. 70, a single-member district. Defendants then submitted these proposed districts to the Attorney General of the United States for clearance as required by Section 5 of the Act. By letter dated I October 1984 the Attorney General interposed an objection. unress this objection is withdrawn or the pran is approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, no election may be conducted in the districts as proposed. Plaintiffs have moved the Court to adopt an interim plan for the election of representatives from the affected area and to establish a schedule of dates for the primary and election prior to the convening of the GeneraL Assembly in February 1985. Plaintiffs have particularly requested that the primary date for said election be coincident with the general election to be held on 6 November 1984. Defendants have responded, opposing all- relief sought. At a later date the Court will enter an order providing for an interim plan for the election of representatives from the area in question in four single-member districts and defining the districts. Agreeing with defendants that it is impr:actica] to hold the primary on 6 November 1984, that order shall also establish primary and general election dates. Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to submit to the Court not later than 5 p.m., 22 October 1984, a proposed interim redistricting plan and election schedule which shalI provide for: (a) four single-member districts; and (b) a general election to be held not Iater than 3l January I985. Plaintiffs frdy, if they so desire, rely on proposals already submi tted. rhis JLoctober teo4. J. DICKSON PHILLIPS United States Circult Judge FRANKLIN T. DT'PREE, JR. United States District Judge W. EARL BRITT United States District Judge By FOR THE COURT I crtl, the bregoihg fo De a true ad corect copy of tha original. J. Rich Leonar4 Clerk United States District Court Eastegr Distrig,,gf North CarotinaBywww