Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Robert Pear (New York Times) Re: Major v. Treen
Correspondence
August 11, 1983
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Robert Pear (New York Times) Re: Major v. Treen, 1983. 72b94b1d-e592-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1bf41f97-5f65-46b6-b14c-7352b914d4fb/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-robert-pear-new-york-times-re-major-v-treen. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
ffiesar@renseH.
Argust 1I, 1093
Mr. Robert Pear
The New York Times
10OO Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C.20036
Dear Robert:
I enclose a coBy of 'a speech I gave attackj-ng Brad
Reynoldsr voting rights enforcement record. The case
which I discuss at length (pp. 5-10) is Major v. Treen.
This was the case in which Reynolds backdaEed a memo-
randum in anticipation of our lawsuit, and to justify
his rejection of the staff finding that the redistrict-
ing plan j-n question was in fact purposefully discrimina-
tory. I understand we can expect momentarily a decision
favorable to the black plaintiffs and consistent with
the findings of Justice Department staff lawyers (but NOT
Reynolds).
I will see that a copy of the decision is sent to you by
Express MaiI as soon as it. comes down.
Si.ncd;eIy,
LG/r
Enclosure
'
Contributions are decluctible for IJ.S. income tar purposes
The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & E0UCATI0NAL FUND is not part ol the National Association for the Advancement ol Colored People although ir
was lounded by it and shares its commilment to equal rights. LDF has had lor over 25 years a separate Board, program, stafl, oflii:e and bud-get.
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND. INC.
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019o (212) 586-8397
t Y, <l.l_ L,r.+/\
Lani Guinier