Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant-Intervenors with Certificate of Service

Public Court Documents
August 31, 1999

Cite this item

Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant-Intervenors with Certificate of Service preview

7 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 1a0abd46-e40e-f011-9989-002248226c06

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. School Integration will Continue in Birmingham, 1964. 69d7bea1-bd92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/866e9d78-f91c-4451-a6e3-c26895711e16/school-integration-will-continue-in-birmingham. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    PRESS RELEASE 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE *« NEW YORK, N. Y. 10019 © JUdson 6-8397 

DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY 
President Director-Counsel Associate Counsel 

Ss 

February 28, 1964 

SCHCOL INTEGRATION WILL 
CONTINUE IN BIRMINGHAM 

BIRMINGHAM, ALA.--Forward movement of school integration was assured 
here this week when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to consider a 
school board effort to block desegregation. 

NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys secured some school integra- 
tion even though the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals is still con- 
sidering aspects of the case. 

SEGREGATIONISTS FAIL IN ATTEMPT 
TO THWART GA. SCHOOL INTEGRATION 

BRUNSWICK, GA.--Segregationist efforts to block voluntary school 
integration here were stymied when the U.S. Supreme Court refused 
to hear their appeal this week. 

The Glynn County, Ga. school board had agreed to integrate six 
Negro applicants to the previously all white high school before any 
suit was filed. 

However, white students sued in Federal District Court to pre- 
vent desegregation and that Court granted their request. The NAACP 
Legal Defense Fund intervened in behalf of Negro students and ap- 
pealed to the Sth Circuit Court. This Court ruled in favor of inte- 
gration, 

The segregationists appealed the latter ruling to the U.S. 
Supreme Court, which declined review, thus allowing the NAACP -Legal 
Defense Fund-won integration order to stand. 

The six Negro students are in the white schools. 

HIGH COURT UPHOLDS MIXED 
TRAVEL IN JACKSON, MISS, 

JACKSON, MISS.--Six public transportation companies here must cease 
discrimination against Negro citizens as a result of the U.S. Su- 
preme Court's refusal to hear an appeal from segregationists, 

Attorneys for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund won the favorable 
ruling in the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals last October. The 
Mississippians appealed to the U.S, Supreme Court which this week 
declined to review their appeal, 

Defense Fund attorneys had to challenge Mississippi's segrega- 
tion laws in general before specific relief could be won from the 
carriers, 

Negro citizens may now enter federal courts and receive relief 
should they be further discriminated against by the companies 
Jackson City Lines, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Continen- 
tal Southern Lines (Trailways), Southern GreyhoundLines and the 
Illinois Central Railroad. 

SEF ole

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant-Intervenors with Certificate of Service

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in