Correspondence from Clerk to Stockett Re: Notice of Receipt
Correspondence
October 27, 1976
1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Correspondence from Clerk to Stockett Re: Notice of Receipt, 1976. 13e1be75-722e-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1cddf37d-1223-4d30-8688-ccfb1216a6d1/correspondence-from-clerk-to-stockett-re-notice-of-receipt. Accessed July 18, 2026.
Copied!
[||e109a7e9-d4f7-4b48-9e8f-322fbbd76343||] Inited States Gomnt of Appeals o> Cc PP
FIFTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET
CLERK
NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130
Octoher: 27, 1976
Mr. Peter M. Stockett, Jr.
Special Asst, Atty. General
P. 0. Box ‘220
Jackson, Miss, 39205
No. 76-1865 -.Delores Norwood, ete., Et Al, . vs,
D..L., Harrison, Sr Et Al, ay
(1) Appellants’ motion for supplemental briefing
schedule,
(2) *November 3, 1976.
Dear Sir:
I am authorized by this Court to advise that the above (1) has been received and filed,
and under the rules and practice of this Court will be presented for ruling without oral
argument on the date* shown in column (2) above, together with any response or op-
position that may be filed by opposing counsel by that date.
Very truly yours,
EDWARD W. WADSWORTH, Clerk
5 / 4 a, 5 Py
Deputy Clerk
Melvyn R. Leventhal
* This is only the date on which it is now expected that the matter will be forwarded for ruling and does not mean that this office will be able to advise counsel of the Court’s action by then. Counsel should allow at least ten days’ time thereafter for advice as to the Court’s ruling before making inquiry.
FPI-MI~—7.14.75.3M.4049 [||e109a7e9-d4f7-4b48-9e8f-322fbbd76343||]