Request for Leave to Amend Complaint
Public Court Documents
July 21, 1992
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Request for Leave to Amend Complaint, 1992. f5114e66-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/215cb99b-dadd-4670-8d21-42940444d6e7/request-for-leave-to-amend-complaint. Accessed November 02, 2025.
Copied!
’
Cv89-0360977S
MILO SHEFF, et al.
Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT
JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN
AT HARTFORD
Vv.
WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al.
Defendants JULY 21, 1992
4
h
o
e
e
e
L
L
L
J
L
L
LL
]
LX
]
‘
4
[1
]
e
e
[x
]
REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
Pursuant to Practice Book §176, plaintiffs respectfully request
leave to amend the complaint at paragraphs 47, 50, and 71. This
amendment is necessary for the following reasons:
1. Although plaintiffs have clearly indicated that the state’s
role in segregated housing patterns is not a necessary part of their
affirmative case, the presence of several passing references to defen-
dants’ housing policies in the Complaint has apparently led to some
confusion on the part of defendants regarding the scope of plaintiffs’
proof. It continues to be plaintiffs’ position that housing evidence
is not part of their case, and they wish to eliminate any ambiguity
in the pleadings that may be relied on by defendants to divert the
Court’s attention from the important educational issues that are at
the core of this case.
2. The parties have discussed, unsuccessfully, the possible
elimination of the "housing issue" by stipulation. The presence of
certain statements regarding housing in the Complaint was one of the
factors that made such a stipulation unworkable.
3. This amendment is necessary to conform the complaint to the
proof to be presented at trial.
4. This amendment is necessary to reduce and focus the scope of
issues to be tried to this Court.
Wesley W. Horton
Moller, Horton, & Rice
90 Gillett Street
Hartford, CT 06105
Julius L. Chambers
Marianne Engelman Lado
Ronald L. Ellis
NAACP Legal Defense &
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
Helen Hershkoff
John A. Powell
Adam S. Cohen
American Civil Liberties
Union Foundation
132 West 43rd Street
New York, NY 10036
BY:
Respectfully Submitted,
y AR 4
Philip D. Tegeler
Martha Stone
Connecticut Civil Liberties
Union Foundation
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Wilfred Rodriguez
Hispanic Advocacy Project
Neighborhood Legal Services
1229 Albany Avenue
Hartford, CT 06112
John Brittain
University of Connecticut
School of Law
65 Elizabeth Street
Bartford, CT 06105
Ruben Franco
Jenny Rivera
Puerto Rican Legal Defense
and Education Fund
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
ORDER
The foregoing request having been heard is hereby GRANTED/DENIED.
Hammer, J.
Dated this day of July, 1992
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that one copy of the foregoing has been mailed
postage prepaid by certified mail to John R. Whelan and Martha M.
Watts, Assistant Attorneys General, MacKenzie Hall, 110 Sherman
py
Street, Hartford, CT 06105 this J&? day of July, 1992.
JF 7 Tee
Philip D. Tegeler