Correspondence from Tigue to Davis Re: Amendment SB741
Correspondence
April 8, 1985
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Garner Working Files. Correspondence from Tigue to Davis Re: Amendment SB741, 1985. 69bdca0c-35a8-f011-bbd3-000d3a53d084. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/219ccc74-9b26-4757-a3eb-79aaf4cace2a/correspondence-from-tigue-to-davis-re-amendment-sb741. Accessed July 01, 2026.
Copied!
OFFICE OF LEGAL SERVICES
STATE OF TENNESSEE
T k .-s rs '̂ lrv€' 5>î crNcl̂ wtr\4 "Vo yow-r dt^cfly
d i d f i i c l 4ke. /f#forofy
Ge^tiiil. Xr\ krv ô \r\«or> a^d rvwrvt, \^o^td
Teir\r\e^ce l̂ v>> ir\'^o " fit(I cor^^t’̂ ncc
Wi'VU +kt, Urxi'-Vecl S'fa’f f i Cos^r’f
cJ6̂ iŝ o<̂ </\ 'kkt Cise I^Kinessee
/ 1 C v * ^
»v«Y
( AMENDMENT NO.
d̂-Jk
Signature of Sponsor
AMEND Senate Bill No. 741 House Bill No. 417
by deleting Section 1 in its entirety and substituting instead
the following:
SECTION 1. Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 40-7-108,
is amended by deleting the section in its entirety and
substituting instead the following:
(a) If, after notice of the intention to
arrest the defendant, he either flees or forcibly
resists, the officer may use all necessary means
to effect the arrest.
(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a), deadly
force is authorized to effect an arrest only if all
other reasonable means of apprehension have been
exhausted, and, where feasible, some warning has
been given the defendant, and:
(1) The officer has probable cause to
believe the defendant has committed a felony
involving the infliction or threatened in
fliction of serious physical harm, or
(2) The officer has probable cause to
believe that the defendant poses a threat of
serious physical harm, either to the officer
or to others unless he is immediately appre
hended.
X43
I
W. J. M I C H A E L C O D Y
a t t o r n e y g e n e r a l a r e p o r t e r
J O H N K N O X W A L K U P
C H IE F D E P U T Y A T T O R N E Y G E N E R A L
W I L L I A M H. F A R M E R
A D V O C A T E G E N E R A L
J I M M Y G . C R E E C Y
A S S O C I A T E C H IE F D E P U T Y
R O B E R T A. G R U N O W
A S S O C I A T E C H IE F D E P U T Y
O F F I C E O F T H E A T T O R N E Y G E N E R A L
A 5 0 JAMES Ro b e r t s o n P a r k w a y
N a s h v i l l e . T e n n e s s e e 3 7 31 9 -5 0 3 5
April 8, 1985
d e p u t y a t t o r n e y s g e n e r a l
D O U G L A S B E R R Y
D O N A L D L. C O R L E W
P A T R I C I A J. C O T T R E L L
R . S T E P H E N d o u g h t y
K A T E E Y L E R
R O B E R T E. K E N D R I C K
C H A R L E S L. L E W I S
F R A N K J . S C A N L O N
J E N N I F E R H. S M A L L
J E R R Y L S M I T H
J O H N F. S O U T H W O R T H , J R .
Representative Michael D. Murphy
Chairman, House Judiciary Committee
Suite 32, Legislative Plaza
Nashville, Tennessee 37219
Dear Chairman Murphy;
As per your reguest for this office to draft a
bill or amendment to T.C.A. § 40-7-108 to make that
statute comply with the case of Tennessee v^ Garne_r,
please find enclosed herewith a bill drafted in response
to a similar request by Senator Steve Cohen and Represen
tative Joe Kent. This office believes that the attached
proposed legislation will bring Tennessee statutory law
into full compliance with the Garner decision.
Sincerely,
W. J. MICHAEL CODY Attorney General and Reporter
Enclosure