District Judge Rules HEW Suit Requires New Higher Education Plans in 6 States

Press Release
January 17, 1977

Cite this item

District Judge Rules HEW Suit Requires New Higher Education Plans in 6 States preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- f10be844-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Correspondence from Clerk to All Counsel of Record, 1980. fa0be2f7-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/40363eef-cb87-467e-aabc-4b4c203ac53c/correspondence-from-clerk-to-all-counsel-of-record. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    Hinited States Court of Appeals 

FIFTH CIRCUIT 

TEL 504-589-6514 
SLBERTP GANUCHEAU OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET 

LER NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 

September 22, 1980 

TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

No. 77-2507 - leila G. Brown, et al. vs. 

John L. Moore, et al. 

No. 77-2693 - Wiley L. Bolden, et al. vs. 
City of Mobile, et al. 

No. 78-3594 - Merlis J. Broussard, et al. 

Challin Octave Perez, et al. 

Dear Counsel: 

The Court has requested that the parties in the above causes file 

supplemental briefs on the effect of the decision by the United 

States Supreme Court recently decided in City of Mobile v. Bolden, 

100 Supreme Court 1490. Accordingly, supplemental briefs for the 

appellants should be filed within twenty (20) days from this date, 

with appellees' responsive briefs to be filed within fifteen (15) 

days from service of appellants' briefs. ' Any rebuttal briefs for 

appellants should be filed within ten (10) days from service of 

appellees' brief. 

  

After completion of this supplemental briefing schedule, the cases 

will then be forwarded to the Court under its usual screening pro- 

cedures. 

Very truly yours, 

GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU, a a 

BY tes ol al in 
  

“Richard E. Windhorst, Jr., GCHjet 
L-Judicial Support Division-X 

‘ 

J. U. Blacksher + Frank G. Taylor 
Larry Menefee vw. CB, Arendall, Jr. 

Edward Still Mr. William C. Tidwell, III 
Jack Greenbergv Mr. Fred G. Collins 
Eric Schnapper R. Gordon Kean, Jr. 
Armand Derfner . Sidney W. Provensal, Jr. 
Robert C. Campbell, III William J. Guste, Jr. 
Daniel A. Pike . Joseph E. Defley, Jr. 

Stanley A. Halpin, Jr.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

District Judge Rules HEW Suit Requires New Higher Education Plans in 6 States

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in