Correspondence from Schnapper to Days
Correspondence
November 1, 1978
1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Correspondence from Schnapper to Days, 1978. 40c255c6-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/21eb0e5b-9140-474c-9bed-a0b08578b45b/correspondence-from-schnapper-to-days. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
November 1, 1978
Prew S. Days, III
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C.
Dear Drew:
The Supreme Court has taken two cases
involving the rule of White v. Regester, 412
U.S. 755 (1973), that the use of at-large
elections may be forbidden if they disenfranchise
minority voters, City of Mobile v, Bolden,
No. 77-1844; Williams v. Brown, No. 78-357.
Some members of the Court have for several
years been uneasy about the developing caselaw,
and we suspect there may be a major retrench-
ment. The greatest dangers are that they will
hold White does not apply to city elections, or
that White is bad law after Washington v. Davis.
The issue is of great importance, since at-large
voting schemes are by far the most important
device now in use in the south to keep blacks
from holding public office or wielding any
political power.
An amicus brief from the government would,
needless to say, be welcome. If these cases
are of possible interest to you, I would be glad
to provide the relevant materials to whoever in
the Department might work on them.
Yours gincerely,
Sr a tr
Eric Schnapper
ES:aa
10" COLUMBUS CIRCLE 586-8397 NEW YORK," N, ¥Y.: TOO 11'S