Franks v. Bowman Transportation Company Certificate Required by Local Rule 13(a)
Public Court Documents
January 1, 1972
Cite this item
-
Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Company Certificate Required by Local Rule 13(a), 1972. 0adc2e59-b29a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/22aa1719-736e-4587-bc70-b10270e3073e/franks-v-bowman-transportation-company-certificate-required-by-local-rule-13-a. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 7 2 - 3 2 3 9
HAROLD FRANKS,
P l a i n t i f f - A p p e l l a n t ,
a n d
JOHNNIE LEE,
I n t e r v e n o r - A p p e l l a n t ,
- v s -
BOWMAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, e t a l . ,
D e f e n d a n t s - A p p e l l e e s .
CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY LOCAL RULE 13 (a)
The u n d e r s i g n e d c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d f o r P l a i n t i f f - A p p e l l a n t
a n d I n t e r v e n o r - A p p e l l a n t c e r t i f i e s t h a t t h e f o l l o w i n g l i s t e d
p a r t i e s h a v e a n i n t e r e s t i n t h e o u t c o m e o f t h i s c a s e . T h e s e
r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s a r e made i n o r d e r t h a t J u d g e s o f t h i s C o u r t may
e v a l u a t e p o s s i b l e d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n o r r e c u s a l p u r s u a n t t o
L o c a l R u l e 13 {a ) .
!*■ E T .
to Intervenor Lee in the net amount lie lost due toback pay
his discharge.
Respectfully submitted,
jfytcrms 1, Q-clJjIsl--'.
HOWARD MOORE ,<v.JR.
ELIZABETH R. RINDSKOPF
75 Piedmont Avenue, N . E .
Suite 1154
Atlanta, Georgia 3 0 303
JACK GREENBERG
WILLIAM L . ROBINSON
MORRIS J . BALLER
BARRY L . GOLDSTEIN
10 C o lum bus C i r c l e
S u i t e 2030
New Y o r k , New Y ork 1 0 0 1 9
Attorneys for Appellants*
* Appellants' attorneys acknowledge with appreciation the
dedicated and competent assistance of Peter Bienstock,
a third year student at the Law School of New York
University, in the preparation of the trial in this case
and of this brief.
50
CONCLUSION
W herefore, for the foregoing reasons it is respectfully
submitted that the judgment of the United States Court
of Appeals should be reversed. The case should be re
manded to the distiict court with instructions to conduct
immediately a hearing on whether some other method of
pupil assignment would, consistently with sound educa
tional principles, sooner disestablish the dual system. If
such be the case that court should order that the speedier
method be employed by defendants.
Respectfully submitted,
J ack Greenberg
J ames M. Nabrit, JIT
F ranklin E. W hite
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
S. W. T ucker
Henry L. Marsh, III
214 East Clay Street
Richmond, Virginia
Attorneys for Petitioners
Of Counsel:
Michael Meltsner
Michael J. H enry
C O N C L U S I O N
F o r t h e r e a s o n s s e t f o r t h a b o v e , t h i s C o u r t s h o u l d
r e v e r s e t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e c o u r t b e l o w a n d r e m a n d w i t h i n
s t r u c t i o n s t o e n t e r a d e c r e e p r o v i d i n g f u l l a n d e f f e c t i v e
r e l i e f t o a p p e l l a n t s an d m em bers o f t h e c l a s s t h e y r e p r e s e n t .
S u c h r e l i e f s h o u l d s p e c i f i c a l l y i n c l u d e : (1) t h e u s e o f f u l l
c o m p a n y s e n i o r i t y b y c l a s s m em b ers who a r e now e m p l o y e d , a n d
r e t r o a c t i v e s e n i o r i t y f o r c l a s s m e m b e rs who a r e r e j e c t e d a p p l i
c a n t s a n d a r e l a t e r h i r e d ; (2) a n a f f i r m a t i v e p r o g r a m f o r h i r i n g
B l a c k r o a d d r i v e r s on a r a t i o a s s u g g e s t e d h e r e i n , a n d f o r r e
c r u i t m e n t o f B l a c k a p p l i c a n t s f o r o f f i c e / c l e r i c a l p o s i t i o n s ;
(3) a t r a i n i n g p r o g r a m t o a s s i s t B l a c k s i n e n t e r i n g j o b s f r o m
v h i c h t h e y h a v e b e e n e x c l u d e d ; (4) p r o v i s i o n f o r r e t a i n e d j u r i s
d i c t i o n an d r e p o r t i n g b y d e f e n d a n t s ; (5) a n o r d e r t h a t b a c k p a y
may b e g r a n t e d t o c l a s s m e m b e r s , a n d p r o c e e d i n g s t o d e t e r m i n e
t h e a m o u n t s a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n t h e r e o f ; (6) a n a w a r d o f b a c k p a y
t o p l a i n t i f f F r a n k s i n t h e n e t a m o u n t h e l o s t d u e t o t h e d e n i a l
o f p r o m o t i o n o r t r a n s f e r a n d h i s d i s c h a r g e ; (7) a n a w a r d o f
66