Franks v. Bowman Transportation Company Certificate Required by Local Rule 13(a)
Public Court Documents
January 1, 1972

Cite this item
-
Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Company Certificate Required by Local Rule 13(a), 1972. 0adc2e59-b29a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/22aa1719-736e-4587-bc70-b10270e3073e/franks-v-bowman-transportation-company-certificate-required-by-local-rule-13-a. Accessed October 08, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 7 2 - 3 2 3 9 HAROLD FRANKS, P l a i n t i f f - A p p e l l a n t , a n d JOHNNIE LEE, I n t e r v e n o r - A p p e l l a n t , - v s - BOWMAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, e t a l . , D e f e n d a n t s - A p p e l l e e s . CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY LOCAL RULE 13 (a) The u n d e r s i g n e d c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d f o r P l a i n t i f f - A p p e l l a n t a n d I n t e r v e n o r - A p p e l l a n t c e r t i f i e s t h a t t h e f o l l o w i n g l i s t e d p a r t i e s h a v e a n i n t e r e s t i n t h e o u t c o m e o f t h i s c a s e . T h e s e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s a r e made i n o r d e r t h a t J u d g e s o f t h i s C o u r t may e v a l u a t e p o s s i b l e d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n o r r e c u s a l p u r s u a n t t o L o c a l R u l e 13 {a ) . !*■ E T . to Intervenor Lee in the net amount lie lost due toback pay his discharge. Respectfully submitted, jfytcrms 1, Q-clJjIsl--'. HOWARD MOORE ,<v.JR. ELIZABETH R. RINDSKOPF 75 Piedmont Avenue, N . E . Suite 1154 Atlanta, Georgia 3 0 303 JACK GREENBERG WILLIAM L . ROBINSON MORRIS J . BALLER BARRY L . GOLDSTEIN 10 C o lum bus C i r c l e S u i t e 2030 New Y o r k , New Y ork 1 0 0 1 9 Attorneys for Appellants* * Appellants' attorneys acknowledge with appreciation the dedicated and competent assistance of Peter Bienstock, a third year student at the Law School of New York University, in the preparation of the trial in this case and of this brief. 50 CONCLUSION W herefore, for the foregoing reasons it is respectfully submitted that the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals should be reversed. The case should be re manded to the distiict court with instructions to conduct immediately a hearing on whether some other method of pupil assignment would, consistently with sound educa tional principles, sooner disestablish the dual system. If such be the case that court should order that the speedier method be employed by defendants. Respectfully submitted, J ack Greenberg J ames M. Nabrit, JIT F ranklin E. W hite 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 S. W. T ucker Henry L. Marsh, III 214 East Clay Street Richmond, Virginia Attorneys for Petitioners Of Counsel: Michael Meltsner Michael J. H enry C O N C L U S I O N F o r t h e r e a s o n s s e t f o r t h a b o v e , t h i s C o u r t s h o u l d r e v e r s e t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e c o u r t b e l o w a n d r e m a n d w i t h i n s t r u c t i o n s t o e n t e r a d e c r e e p r o v i d i n g f u l l a n d e f f e c t i v e r e l i e f t o a p p e l l a n t s an d m em bers o f t h e c l a s s t h e y r e p r e s e n t . S u c h r e l i e f s h o u l d s p e c i f i c a l l y i n c l u d e : (1) t h e u s e o f f u l l c o m p a n y s e n i o r i t y b y c l a s s m em b ers who a r e now e m p l o y e d , a n d r e t r o a c t i v e s e n i o r i t y f o r c l a s s m e m b e rs who a r e r e j e c t e d a p p l i c a n t s a n d a r e l a t e r h i r e d ; (2) a n a f f i r m a t i v e p r o g r a m f o r h i r i n g B l a c k r o a d d r i v e r s on a r a t i o a s s u g g e s t e d h e r e i n , a n d f o r r e c r u i t m e n t o f B l a c k a p p l i c a n t s f o r o f f i c e / c l e r i c a l p o s i t i o n s ; (3) a t r a i n i n g p r o g r a m t o a s s i s t B l a c k s i n e n t e r i n g j o b s f r o m v h i c h t h e y h a v e b e e n e x c l u d e d ; (4) p r o v i s i o n f o r r e t a i n e d j u r i s d i c t i o n an d r e p o r t i n g b y d e f e n d a n t s ; (5) a n o r d e r t h a t b a c k p a y may b e g r a n t e d t o c l a s s m e m b e r s , a n d p r o c e e d i n g s t o d e t e r m i n e t h e a m o u n t s a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n t h e r e o f ; (6) a n a w a r d o f b a c k p a y t o p l a i n t i f f F r a n k s i n t h e n e t a m o u n t h e l o s t d u e t o t h e d e n i a l o f p r o m o t i o n o r t r a n s f e r a n d h i s d i s c h a r g e ; (7) a n a w a r d o f 66