Correspondence from Grace Richardson to Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton

Correspondence
May 13, 1988

Correspondence from Grace Richardson to Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton preview

Cite this item

  • Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Memo from Lani Guinier to Jack Greenberg, 1982. 98c582e6-e392-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3fd8510d-bf6f-437d-814e-7aacff7a40e8/memo-from-lani-guinier-to-jack-greenberg. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    Memoraadum

To : Jack Greenberg

From: Lani Gulnler

Re : Votlng Rlghts Course Materlale

Dater August 31, L982

I w111 have the nateriale ready by September 10. I
aE attachlag a 1lst of cases that are belng xeroxed
for you.. I wlLl aleo have for you coplee o.f the
Sonrto esd llouea Roportr on tha )gEz .xt.n.lon, . c prr-
llulaary ncmorandun on tho legtrlrtlvr hlrtory and
th. Ersn3crlpt of thr Eouer hcarlngr on rxtrarlon (thr
gcnrtr hrartngrf !rlnrcrlpt hr. noE y.t brrn publtrhtd
to try knowledge).

I wtll be Eway Dext week, but wtI1 nake
cotrplots pscket3 1r dcltvcrsd to you on

I hopr thtr dorr not tnconvrnlcncr 1l0u,

sute that ths
oy fttulnr

J,

1., rCLGIt
Attach

Qlctated, but not read



A11en v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1969)

Beer v. United St,ates, 425 U.S. 130 (L976)

BrLscoe v. 8e11, 432 U.S. 404 (L977)

Burns v. Richardson, 384 U.S. 73 (1966)

Canady v. Lumberton City Board of Education, _ U. S. _, 102
s.cr, 494 (1981)

Chapman v. Klng, 154 T.2d 460 (5th Clr.), cert. denled, 327
u. s. 800 (1946)

Chapoan v. Melr, 420 U.S. 1 (1975)

Connor v. ltnch, 43L U.g. 407 (L977)

' Connor v. Wa1ler, 421 U.S. 557 (1975)

Davtr v, Schnc1l,8L F.Supp. 872 (S.D. A1a,1949), Bffrd 336
u.s. 933 (1949)

.Dougherty County v. I^Ihlte, 439 U.S. 32 (l-978)

Fortgon v. Doreey, 379 U. S. 433 (1965)

Gaston County v. Unlted States, 395 U. S. 285 (1969)

Georgla v. United S5ates, 4LL U.S. 526 (1973)

GomlI1lon v. Li.ghtfoot, 364 U. S. 339 (1960)

Grovcy v. Townaend, 295 U.S. 45 (1935)

Gulnn v. Unlted States, 238 U.S. 347 (1915)

Klrksey v. Board of Supervisors of Hinds County, Mlss. r 554 F.2d
139 (5th Cir. ) (en banc) , cert denied, 434 U. S. 968 (1977)

Lane v. WlIson, 307 U.S. 268 (L939)

Lassiter v. Northhampton County Board of Elections, U.S.
(1ese)

Louislana v. United States, U. S.

McDanlel V. Sanchez, 101 S.Ct, 2224 (1981)

McMl1lan v. Escambia County, Florida, 639 F.2d L239 (5ttr Clr. 198L)

Mobll-e, Clty of , v. Bolden, 100 S. Ct. 1490 (1980)



Morrls v. Gressett,e, 432 U. S. 49L (L977)

Nixon v. Condon,286 U.S,73 (1932)

Nixon v. Herndon, 27 3 U.S. 536 (L927)

0regon v. MltcheLl, 400 U.S. L22 (1970)

Perklns v. Matthews, 400 U.S, 379 (1971)

Reynol-ds v. Slmms, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)

Rice v. Elmore, 165 F,2d, 387 (4ttr Cir. Lg47), cert. denled, 333
u.s. 875 (1948)

Rlchnond, Clty ofr vr Unlted SteteB' 422 U.S. 358 (1975)

Bogrrr v, Lodge, U.8. (1982)

Rone, Clty of, v. united states, 1.00 s.ct. L548 (1.980)

srn!.rh v. Allwrtgh.r, 321 U, S. 649 (1944)

South Carollna v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1965)

. Terry v. Adams , 345 U.S . 46L (f953)

Unlted Jewiah 0rganJ.zatLons of Wtlllausburgh v. Carey, 430
u. s. ].44 (L977)

Unlted States Board of Commlssloners of Sheffiel-d, 435 U. S.
110 (L977)

Unttcd States v. UvaldE Conaolldated Indapend,ent SchooI
Dlerrtct, 625 !.2d 547 (5ttr Clr. 1980)

Unlted States v. CLasslc, 313 U.S. 299 (L941)

Uphaur v. Seamon, _ U. S. _, 7L L.Ed.2d 725 (L982)

Washlngton v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (L976)

Whltcomb v. Chavls, 403 U.S. 1-24 (1971)

Whlte v. Regester, 4LZ U.S. 755 (L973)

Wlse v. Llpscomb, 437 U.S. 535 (1978)

Wrlght v. Rockefe1Ler, 376 U. S. 52 (1964)

ZLnmer v. McKerthen, 485 F.2d L297 (5tfr Clr. L973)

-2-

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top