Attorney Notes 1695-1696
Annotated Secondary Research
January 1, 1982
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Attorney Notes 1695-1696, 1982. 435f5908-e192-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/23dd5518-92c1-4d70-851f-808eba2ca7d5/attorney-notes-1695-1696. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
t6#
9,n' .'F"""rrry* j1riffi ;gi'ffi"##ii$F"fity;lifi+:t-:#i
tional representaiiof,' *6" se6m to u"to"'e' as. I read this' that a
ili'"':firi,i[i"i"iies"'iiilra?q.ii"" ti,Lt
?rii"Ify;ili',if;8:"::3'ftti:t;;"i;;-;nt, uiless it can be.shown
illH#i;;ili" byfit;;ffi;i'-ti'"'L ""vt4i#.TJg#lise
report
;; ;, casi that would cause You to re
Mr. RrvNo-.. 1"fri"-i. tf," "rro"t" t"po"t goes s1s,se3!^that there
ir"ii"t,ro."*"-pi;;bd;;*-"bi*'fl"rfrir':,#i,e*['ffi#fifi[^*i'r"i""iriion tttat w6uld suggest tht
"eifects" test.-iii".t"t l,plnv. That by.itself would?
Mr. RuYror,m. That iE riSht'
1696
Senator Lnlnv' \lhere do-you re.ad that in the House report be
""il;i';;
nJ nna that conclusion in there?
Mr. RsyNo-.. ' 'ir'i"i";I; ii-i;yi i" tt","r" is a corelation be
tween the at-large "i*iio"t t"d drsproportiot'"t representatiol ?l
lJ'i]#iiili
-fr,;f ir ."-"iir-i"g tt ri'this particular amendment rs
u3"T;*rt"l"fil.'"o, do not thin-k rhat the hearings conducred b1'
Senator Harch,naiio.-"'ir-t-fi" Houlq -rt" it crystal clear that
F,n1"fi :1,s,l;*r;i::Hr.t,fl 'ffi}f }*l#,ixrz:l't'i:
"'#:ul::iror^os, senator, those cases are fullv consistent with mv
restimony a'd *'ith"il]';;;;;;"d d;-;6t at all suggest the
kind of test that *;;id #fi;i;;-""a"i ihe amendment to the
,"r:T"f:'r'
,EAH'. Do you think-it ls your position rhen that rhe
House report *o,rri"riJ't#i^;h"
-irir-il,i"a&i judge would read a
requiremenl ro. p.'ofiiJiiii-ili.*i"Gli;" oi thl Voting Rights
ofif f,:lffSlT;1"1*r:;,;**a what my statement was and
I did not get it.
^ H"utot'L*sv. What is your statement--
fi';:H;;"-;fi. I ;;;6uie what vou are referring to'
senator Lury. ffi"'G "iiJ
tl"l,i"s[ion or wheth6r a judse \ riu
require proportional representatlon' . -
Mr. RnvNorr.. i'd#i;XT-Liiir'"a' that' a judge. under this
standard could weli Jiiil"Iir vqq ld'C! atJar[e tvt9p- and un-
derrepresentation, iffii ;#i Y';"le u"
"-"rrrci"t't
ti ttlo afoul of the
"resuits" test under section 2
"s "'gge"ted
by -the Hou99 and that
tr,!"r?i"sr.s9i"tl;;;;l-*nt""""-t-t'":?fi
"ti:il'#f,i"HT#%;;;";;?;; in and of itself will not be
Uasis to avoid that reau!'o r r -.