Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Gail Re Kousser's August 16 Letter (VEP v. Cleland)
Correspondence
September 4, 1986
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Gail Re Kousser's August 16 Letter (VEP v. Cleland), 1986. cf6ab7b7-e992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2466bbc1-bfc7-4483-8e4d-f039981af3bd/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-gail-re-koussers-august-16-letter-vep-v-cleland. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
September 4, 1985
LG/ r
cc: Penda
VEP v. CIeIand
To : GaiI
/
From:':*bqt-
Re : Kousser's August 16 letter
Thanks for sharing Kousserrs letter'
I. I propose we get someone else, 3t a lower
hoirly rate, io do the analysis of post-
1954 cases. Cantt we get a law student
at $5 or $I0 Per hour?
2. The pre-45 history should emphasize
regi-stration procedures more, including
r"{,io of blacks registered to dominant
voting procedure in force' This could con-
tinue-to present if possible through a
regression analysis. Try !o gqt a coPy
of the report Kousser did for Jerry Hebert'
mentioned on Page 3 of Kousser's letter'
3. The shift from centralj-zed, standardized
requirementstodecentra}izeddiscretionis
critical and should be the theme of the
report.
4. I don't think Kousser is being greedy
necessarily but in light of questions out-
standing aLout recovery of expert fees 'I'd counter offer as follows:
$40/hour research
$250/day maximum for travel time