Correspondence from Reed to Ganucheau (Clerk); Motion to Expedite Oral Argument
Public Court Documents
March 27, 1990
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Correspondence from Reed to Ganucheau (Clerk); Motion to Expedite Oral Argument, 1990. abd71441-f311-ef11-9f8a-6045bddbf119. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/24eb2847-9c88-4f8c-a1c1-6049ccea7c50/correspondence-from-reed-to-ganucheau-clerk-motion-to-expedite-oral-argument. Accessed November 28, 2025.
Copied!
March 27, 1990
Hon. Gilbert F. Ganucheau
Clerk
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
600 Camp Street
Suite 100
New Orleans, LA 70130
Re: Chisom _et al_, v. Roemer, et al.__
No. 89-3954
Dear Mr. Ganucheau:
Enclosed please find for filing an original and three copies
of a motion to expedite oral argument in the above-mentioned case.
Thank you for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
JR:aa
Encl.
cc: All Counsel
NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET, 16th FLOOR • (212) 219-1900 • NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013
•
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 89-3954
RONALD CHISOM,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant,
V .
CHARLES E. ROEMER, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
MOTION TO EXPEDITE ORAL ARGUMENT
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 45(b) and Rule 47.7(5) of this
Court's Rules, plaintiffs-appellants Ronald Chisom, et al., and the
class of black registered voters in Orleans parish, hereby move
this Court for an order setting this case for oral argument on an
expedited basis. As grounds for this motion, plaintiffs show the
following:
1. The district court judgment in this voting rights case
was entered on September 14, 1989. Plaintiffs-appellants filed
a notice of appeal on September 25, 1989. The parties have
requested oral argument, and this case is now fully briefed.
•
2. This case concerns the method of electing members of the
Louisiana Supreme Court. Chisom V. Edwards, 839 F.2d 1056 (5th
Cir. 1988). On appeal, plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenor argue
that the district court erred in holding that the method of
electing justices in the First District did not violate section 2.
See, Slip Opinion, Record Excerpts pp. 11-52.
3. Justices serve ten-year terms. One of the two
justiceships allocated to the First Supreme Court District—the one
now held by Justice Marcus--is to be filled by election in the fall
of 1990. Pursuant to La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18:467 (1990 Supp.),
candidate qualifying is scheduled to take place on July 25-27,
1990. Candidates must decide whether to seek judicial office prior
to this date. That decision necessarily depends in large part on
a potential candidate's perception of the likelihood of success.
The relief sought by plaintiffs is the partition of the First
District into two single-member districts, one of which would have
a black majority. Thus, should plaintiffs prevail on this appeal,
it is likely that one or more black candidates would decide to seek
office.
4. In this case, a panel of this Court has ruled that while,
as a rule, an election should not be enjoined, the results may be
set aside and a special election held. Chiaom v. Roemer, 853 F.2d
1186 (1988) (vacating preliminary injunction). Advancing the
argument date might avoid the prospect of a special election in the
event that plaintiffs prevail on this appeal. In addition, an
earlier argument date might also avoid the prejudice that would
41,
result to candidates who would run for election if a new single-
member district is created.
WHEREFORE, plaintiffs request that the Court set this case for
argument as soon as possible.
Respectfully submitted,
WILLIAM P. QUIGLEY
901 Convention Center Blvd.
Fulton Place _
Suite 119
New Orleans, LA 70130
(504) 524-0016
ROY RODNEY, JR.
McGlinchey, Stafford, Mintz,
Cellini, Lang
643 Magazine Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
(504) 586-1200
PAMELA S. KARLAN
University of Virginia
School of Law
Charlottesville, VA 22901
(804) 924-7810
LIUS LeVONNE CHAMBERS
CHARLES STEPHEN RALSTON
JUDITH REED
DAYNA L.CUNNINGHAM
SHERRILYN A. IFILL
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, NY 10013
(212) 219-1900
RONALD L. WILSON
310 Richard Building
837 Gravier Street •
New Orleans, LA 70112
(504) 525-4361
C. LANI GUINIER
University of Pennsylvania
School of Law
3400 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204
(215) 898-7032
. A04
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on March 27, 1990, I served copies of
the foregoing motion to expedite
listed below by causing them to
first class, postage prepaid:
William J. Guste, Jr., Esq.
Attorney General
Louisiana Department of Justice
234 Loyola Avenue, Suite 700
Orleans, LA 70112-2096
M. Truman Woodward, Jr., Esq.
1100 Whitney Building
New Orleans, LA 70130
Blake G. Arata, Esq.
210 St. Charles Avenue
Suite 4000
New Orleans, LA 70170
A.R. Christovich, Esq.
1900 American Bank Building
New Orleans, LA 70130
Moise W. Dennery, Esq.
21st Floor Pan American
Life Center
601 Poydras Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
oral argument upon the attorneys
be sent via United States 'nail,
Robert G. Pugh, Esq.
Commercial National Tower
333 Texas Street, Suite 2100
Shreveport, LA 71101-5302
Iry Gorenstein, Esq.
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66078
Washington, D.C. 20035-6075
George M. Stickler,Esq.
639 Loyola Street
Suite 1075
New Orleans, LA 70113
Peter But2er, Esq.
Butler, Heebe & Hirsh
712 American Bank Building
New Orleans, LA 70130
Moon Landrieu, Esq.
717 Girod Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Counsel for laintiffs-Appellants