Memo from Lani Guinier to LDF staff Re: News Alert
Correspondence
January 19, 1984

1 page
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Gail Re Kousser's August 16 Letter (VEP v. Cleland), 1986. cf6ab7b7-e992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2466bbc1-bfc7-4483-8e4d-f039981af3bd/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-gail-re-koussers-august-16-letter-vep-v-cleland. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
September 4, 1985 LG/ r cc: Penda VEP v. CIeIand To : GaiI / From:':*bqt- Re : Kousser's August 16 letter Thanks for sharing Kousserrs letter' I. I propose we get someone else, 3t a lower hoirly rate, io do the analysis of post- 1954 cases. Cantt we get a law student at $5 or $I0 Per hour? 2. The pre-45 history should emphasize regi-stration procedures more, including r"{,io of blacks registered to dominant voting procedure in force' This could con- tinue-to present if possible through a regression analysis. Try !o gqt a coPy of the report Kousser did for Jerry Hebert' mentioned on Page 3 of Kousser's letter' 3. The shift from centralj-zed, standardized requirementstodecentra}izeddiscretionis critical and should be the theme of the report. 4. I don't think Kousser is being greedy necessarily but in light of questions out- standing aLout recovery of expert fees 'I'd counter offer as follows: $40/hour research $250/day maximum for travel time