Motion to Intervene as Defendants
Public Court Documents
April 16, 1970
26 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Motion to Intervene as Defendants, 1970. a38c1ef0-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/26c526ff-c69b-471e-909f-917e6610a63c/motion-to-intervene-as-defendants. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
L] $ :
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff- Appellant
Court of Appeals
Nos. 28030 and
28042
LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, ef al., Defendants-Appellees
D.C. Civil Action
No. 2216
MOTION TO
INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS
COME NOW O. R. Cross, Hunter Butler, James Ray
Calhoun, Dr. John W. Waller, Pat Shivers and Eugene Myers,
together with those other persons whose signatures appear on
Exhibit 1, which is attached to this motion and made a part hereof
for all purposes, who are parents, guardians and patrons of children
enrolled in Grades 9 through 12 of Lawrence County School District
and who file this motion to intervene in their own right and on their
own behalf and on behalf of their respective children and wards, and
on behalf of all others similarly situated, and respectfully move the
Court for leave to intervene as defendants in this action in order to
assert the defenses set forth in their proposed response, a copy of
which is attached hereto and filed herewith, to the motion for supple-
mental relief filed herein on or about January 7, 1970, by the NAACP
Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc. for the following grounds
and reasons:
1. Applicants are parents, guardians and patrons,
respectively of children, both White and Negro, enrolled in Grades 9
through 12 of Lawrence County School District, which said children are
presently attending one of the following schools of the District: Monticello
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and
McCullough Attendance Center. The purpose of this intervention is to
seek the maintenance and preservation of said schools as they are pre-
sently constituted and as they are presently being operated under orders
of this Court and to oppose the motion for supplemental relief filed
herein on or about Tanusey 7, 1970, by the NAACP Legal and Educational
Fund, Inc. by which motion for supplemental relief said Fund is
attempting to obtain an order of this Court requiring that all students
of the Lawrence County School District in Grades 9 through 12 be forced
to attend McCullough High School and other changes incidental thereto.
2. Appliants file this motion for leave to intervene as
defendants in their own right and on their own behalf and on behalf of
their respective children and wards and on behalf of all others similarly
situated who likewise oppose said efforts of said Fund, as reflected by
the motion for supplemental relief. The class of persons similarly
situated is so numerous that joinder of all members is impractical,
there are questions of law or fact common to the class, the claims and
defenses asserted and to be asserted by applicants as representative
parties are typical of the claims and defenses of the class, the representa-
tive parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class
and the relief sought by said motion for supplemental relief will adversely
effect the constitutional rights of all members of the class.
3. The applicants, and their respective children and wards,
and those whom they represent, have valuable constitutional rights which
are threatened by the action of said NAACP Legal and Educational Defense
Fund, Inc. The children have a right to the best public education
possible and the right to attend schools in their respective areas of
residence without discrimination on account of race, and the right to
education by duly elected officials without interference. The granting of
the relief sought by said supplemental motion will violate the constitutional
rights of said children and these applicants and those they represent
under the equal protection and due process provisions of the United
States Constitution and related provisions of the Mississippi Constitution.
The hearing of said motion for supplementary relief, which seeks relief
vitally affecting these applicants and their children and others similarly
situated and which will amount to a violation of their constitutional rights,
without an opportunity to be heard with respect thereto of itself would
constitute a violation of their rights and the taking of their liberty
and property without due process of law.
4. Other reasons set forth in the response to said motion
of for supplemental relief attached hereto and filed herewith.
5. Supporting affidavit is annexed hereto as an exhibit
and made a part hereof for all purposes.
re Fh ME oo Melle)”
R. W. Heidelberg /
Post Cffice Box 1070
Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Of Counsel for Applicants
J. P. Patterson
Post Office Box 11
Monticello, Mississippi
Francis Vining
Monticello, Mississippi
R. W. Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Sutherland & McKenzie
Post Office Box 1070
Hattiesburg, Mississippl 39401
Attorneys for Applicants (Intervener-Defendants)
NOTICE OF MOTION
Notice is hereby given that the foregoing motion for leave
to intervene as defendants will be called up for hearing before the
Honorable Dan M. Russell, Jr., United States District Judge, at the
United States Courthouse in the City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, at
9:00 a. m., April 20, 1970, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be
heard.
WITNESS my signature on this /& A day of April, A. D.,
1970.
EH Lo or
Attorney for Applicants (Ylervener-
Defendants)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned attorney for Applicants (Intervener-
Defendants), do hereby certify that I have, this date, served the fore-
going motion and notice, together with supporting affidavit and attached
reply to motion for supplemental relief, by mailing a true copy of each
by United States mail, properly addressed and postage prepaid to
each of the following counsel of record:
Honorable David L.. Norman Honorable Robert Hauberg
Assistant Attorney General United States Attorney
Department of Justice Federal Building
Washington, D. C. Jackson, Mississippi
Honorable Melvyn R. Leventhal Honorable Jack Greenberg
Honorable Reuben V. Anderson Honorable Norman Chachkin
Honorable Fred L. Banks, Jr. Honorable Jonathan Shapiro
Honorable John A. Nichols Suite 2030
538 1/2 North Farish Street 10 Columbus Circle
Jackson, Mississippi 390202 New York, New York 10019
Attorneys for NAACP Legal Attorneys for NAACP Legal
and Educational Defense and Educational Defense
Fund,. Inc. Fund, Inc.
Honorable James S. George Honorable Robert G. Turnage
Post Office Box 493 Monticello, Mississippi
Monticello, Mississippi Attorney for Lawrence County
Attorney for Lawrence County School District
School District
Honorable M. M. Roberts
Fifth Floor, Citizens Bank Building
Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Attorney for Lawrence County School District
WITNESS my signature on this 64 day of April, A. D.,
1970.
er 1 LY a
R. W. Heidelbergy/
% ~~
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
Civil Action No, 2216 (D.C.): No, 28030 and 28042 (C,C. A, 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled
in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently operated under court order.
‘
~~ Signature Address
{7s 9
A // £ 3 ray A 72 i ai a: # rl ¥i 7 / Bis Z.&3 y ( / 7 2 Fy ¥ ( 3 [A i
/ 4 3 )
5 / 7 J Vy, ; A \ } A) / ~ y
/ J ; Th / Vi or A 2s, / 7’ Z Cr (pr 7 <h
A 4 A
— wom ’ / / NOS, y 8 pr) AA “22 shy 4
\ ’ LEARN | | q£ (ac hooallo Miss
7 / “/ 77 pr
/
A SA A ¢ / 4
tai 4 wn awd Ua Apa
-
C.. JA
F200 2 ret Sozs
7 4 .
i - + wif ~~
[1S A-Cel\p YWilzZ- ,
C
. 2 Yard’ Lael 227 eta =
on DoH rz 2 : Zz "
7 2X RLY ATH AA ELLY For nh AAS rt lr V
ze pr [SY f 7 Pad” / ed BA =
¥ 7 v : : et >
/ (0D ) R77 3s Snr Tt IY mr le 200 SYN Tn
- ” fl uly
A / ti ih #4 ym -
(id 2 [lade lt / Lo LAA Slide»
H » \ h / ; \
” a 4 y 3 2 “ ed ” 7, I
2) 7 gz 4 J 7
ZN SOA Cs Zc A hw. 2 Zoog in Wl Ae,
0; IE §Z / A oz Le. 7 Loon / rot) Vande a ~
ph
af . , J ws 7 oo
pa tv V7" Lir 2 ANN Cor Yep OR Je LL J¢ 9) Fidei >
: Z Jo
[} i Zz /! - y y - -
’ - - . v / > 4 4 : , 1 Loe st Jr , S Zs Wi Brrr
™\ - ’ y rf v
% § rs / i [5 ff “) 7 4 he 2! yA —_y 10 AAS A rel le LIT re
i cs ig : /
f/f va gj / { ™N ’ T—
[is c . Py
i. . ’ Ly ) y ; - — Hig , / 1: ja 1" of b V J 3 YY :
/ ) +) ” v4 aw. —-
A ds W \ J ’ ae Wd / JN zl ’ ssi
’ ‘ / 37 gi ’ 5 be £1 /” « 4 rH
fo EXHIBIT 1
(consisting of 11 pages)
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
Civil Action No, 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C.C. A, 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled
in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently operated under court order.
Signature Address
/ : [ 7
/ bi / a . / F
; -— / / . J / ”
£L 7 £ ’ St \/ Sf A / ff se J Pp rd Z, /
/ / LN pif / SAT ey BN a [ \ 7 Lg Wa : Al Ver ~All ,
; vi 7 7 .- >
/ A ri
:
Vv ) y ’ g .
g Lai” / / - ( A / Li A 1 2 / uid le) 3
Ye. 2) dae U {LCi : or Cero l CO [Ser t/
a 44
SA
aa gi
JI At 2dr l rl A Va BP 4 J od PPA Af es, ins = 7
- 7 7 A
7 ))/) A 2 / / S: : Z i'd /) LE) Ce Ce (rss 222 az =
Fire Le /. )) d / ra
ly
—
"a / / C : .
i> / ~~) i / rd ; / / { £ oS ~ 22 / Lh ~~ A) 2D
= ” 4 4
N of
/ le / Cr 74 7)
/ ¥ / / / / s | SL -
. - A . i C LL CA ZL Y 7
di < a » 7
1S APE 7 4 :
. po jig 7 PA 4 <” ~~ _, /
/ Fi ot 4’. LZ f A Z 77 | 7¢ ye
Pin 7
, \ 1 { >
; ) jis A “ def ~
b, / als / FAS SS) J 7 7 )
/ / fF] 7 . yi) <r A UD ea toca lin 2.1L oe » po cy ? -7
L \
# ; oa
}i
” Ei or
)
/ > a / / / ) - - 2 gk, pi gf / / 7 // eA ws AL J vii ?
ds
Sr - » / fe : ‘ ~rt / / Jy rf Smtr / Nara Al 223 24.
J
)
yeti f a a \ : of —
4 / . 4 i \ 1) {ry = A {i 7/7 Lo A¢ £L yi Ara,
’/ ~~) a” 3
( Va 1 / / J N ” : y al : / / my [ \ / ’ / »
y 7 / Lr / {A i / J lr ( //7 4 ALAA LAL
BY 5
7
j — ’ // , 5 / A Va Td 2 FE V4 r
bi A 1 / Vl MA Ler rt ’/
. i)
—
/ / o 23 i 4 Peli iy ~~
i ne ir, or ” rail po, 7 bo i 7’
/ /
/ } ae a - § A =
{-/ 1 : 7 ' 4 7 IAP i ; 7. 3 of .
Mf / 7 J & Goal! a A fre / /: 7% LC or / Wa
FA
/ {
SAL — iy A \ a Io fat], 7 / 11 J [ C., ry: 3 Fal f J Ui BE ITU AL ¢ 2 Lo
A ) Zt f Jf —pn / \ pod by
/ d } L { 7 74 A C/A Br {Ly 7 [i
74 - ) 3 -
/ or a i
% Zz } [ / / ; ) ~, a { N
" Si # > i Critr of of Rr a 7:4 ( / / i - J)
- / 4 :
fit / \ C
- { \ \ | { oS \ /
/ /
’ y Vib / A AA
j jot rf 4 (JV rs At Lh yp) ys Ho J / wate EY FA or Lh "TN AA" LA wef Fk od | gy,
: al. - - —. - mi a [4g
J A y:/ ‘8. ps / Vi y Vd 4 ( . WotR <} w.q. 1 A+
i eo Fig
PL Va nT dl a
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C. ); No. 28030 and 28042 (C.C. A. 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled
in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently operated under court order.
Signature
” -
Jf Cll ~~ A ll - iN ? | " fl
[> A We LaAlUGAAe
Address
Senile, Teas
Lhe {lit Loli Lodlertindd
) oi )
14 Lif / /, 7
Fh 7, £2 Ll iP LLY d
7 74
vol z / re 27
\ [Zor vl rz 277 LL]
1] /) ~ 1 pd J oA
of et J © 7
tA “ N/M SP
LL, A Yio
) ¢ La , ~~
INA BA A MWA, Ck A
=
// - YY, £=\ . 4
AAS” 1 les 7 lL
LA Re J Vo
Z/ 3 / , hl fa, v/f 28S ey RA //
/ / /
hs Jz 2. (Fa ss 7 ee —
y= y .
~) 71 /
NACE {ese 74 >1//, / AKL fx
Pa
2% zy vd :
7 1 7 Ee 7 7 / < ot CCA A
| 7 | |
Noa 7
N\/ Fe L \ | A
X Y.¢ 0 ) IN OM x00 i
~ Ny ©
Pd
Ld Vall a
FINS
rr / 7) /
“NrIo€e_'T WAI od
A
i
of
ps g76 Llu Xl. yh
il He ON IN
* gay (i =
/ /, 7 /
s A) " a
4 (/ 7 > SAC / FZ
J
Cn AR
pratt ay
Td TT ari
Peed fs Fins
i Noritz Us : Hee
Va Las VOI e wen
/~
Zr lr
re ANN Wr A,
2) er Zeawr ll, TV),
sen bc 3 Ln . ad
7 Noataoe tts |, 770iad
ir SN, Wh eas
i ) Lon EX 2. Lo ae
Mone ZLeoclte Ea
A ae 20 lt
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C. ); No. 28030 and 28042 (C. C. A. 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled
in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently operated under court order.
Signature Address
/
o i PE
'
~~ ‘7
/ 4 1] / / / 7 / / i / y SN. ff \ / ‘ x ~~ S——“go—
—~——t £
J ’
Ya 7 A
J -
pr
!
- - 7 - y
4 & - - J J ~ \ -y
rily X or
! Li )
— ra / by i
Ci -
~~ /
)
.
A > 4 .
" / / \\ Zz '} © D / ; 4 v4 J |} f.. \2 —pn
pe
I ”
/ f y / / 7 /
7 4 -~
} fe 2 - oo
- / . Wi Ar SN ¢ J 7
Bm / SA fe ler loo - 4 ry
\ EE
A Pe /
7 / / ’ J {
p \ —~
rd . \ =) Fi CY 21 77 ¢ / re — a.
rv, —" X
y ~~ p, ’ a ; ~
/ go J of a
\ y . i ~ A lL ” id OO dt
i Pd J
A 4 A / ” / 7 7A — ve Tn hi. iF. 7 -, i
J ~~ - —-—
4 ] ' 7) / ‘ i
, 27 » —3"7 Z, Ww. t/ 7 7,
—
\ ~ \ : 3 \ 7
\.
if C / ,
. \ p
” ’ v a rd J . Fox 5 lec Ze 22. Pl Py Wud
—
/ ”/
A 7 /
/ Joh A / Narn / . ; }-.1 y / | { | ZS] ly : ( F J |
/ |! -
- fo - 7 yd
ALLL ’ Yr AT .
won os NN —" ————
gf
J
1 7 / ) /
fr / / / J i { Ef Sf FAC
/ / fh
/ /
‘
2 i / \
v
™.
\
—
- i
y Pd 7 A
i amr 4 2 iL
> -
s
> / Ay N 7 / 2 7} J \ / / . ah A FAN A of
[74
/ pe
/ , pe J - ® o n 27 Az. ¢ I CASE Ae 2
‘L ] oi 4 — pt mm
PRA ; ’; a — >
- / . - / ~ , 4 BAT
I poe
- —
¥ - “ ro Pe fy iol » Y — A —————— -— = - WE —-— br imi rath, an
—— ”~ '
L 4 / 7 rd “3 4
il J rd J
Re > J S
/7 / 8 4
// J =
// ’
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
Civil Action No, 2216 (D.C. );: No. 28030 and 28042 (C.,C. A, 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled
in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently operated under court order.
Signature Address
Vol /
/ ” / — Ca
/ Vd 2 A ol
ed ;
rif
a ( pe V4 J /
Fe 7, Cl 0 Ae dr"
7) — / \
¥, Jie) / re / 7: 23” dy Zz: 4 Lf 2 ye: Salis n J sar,
g oa 4
id
J / / “2 7}]
/ Z /S ~~ / ’ ”? Nc” ¥ J } 7
w - SS Ld ,
= ” me Sg : — i
rf / / a xt 1, /
X . - { . er
/ / J A Lr SZ FAREED
of ) ¥
AA A 5
4 arc : ~ —
2
’
/
) : —~ ;
yA
2 AS ee /, Fr “1 ;
p /
/ {A ; { {- oh Le y 2 ZL ez
7 : 5
: :
if
$F / J f / ~~ —-_— = .
+
|
N—————
Cot oJ 185 we pili THF {3 )
<
: AJA fr v4 ir AAA J | AALS iT Son A 7) 1 rd]
i = ’ ie . N y
;
/ ” 54 /
/
§~ / a /
\ A ~ 5 Lf Pi J J v4 /) I. 2 737
lL
Fla LLL (E CLL, Slr, - Fil ’ \/ rr y 7 aa :
4
/ /
&/f
.
pr
/ HF
bi 7 ~ // i
77»
LEE 2
2
: ’ ze
vk
/ 2 =
A
: ’ 4
; ;
:
Load 1
Fi
f
» : = /
)
pr { \
SL -~ {
' 4 - / / ) 7 »
g ” ;
a WL § ;
x 1/0" A : ;
pa -~ ¥ / V4 1 { vi Y
A 1s {/ ? 9 f(s . { /7, 2 V2 } Ntzs. ~
~~ — J
il pL a g
4 * i
lf x — X ro, 4 yy :
J ) —_r3"7]. >The 2) A Cz LT / Sl Z 7 / / 2 ~ Vi : A
/ +) ~
— / — uh EL i ”) Gy J / ’\ 7
el, Se 7] LB] yy aY C tL, ”) Cong
/ 4 in EERE PT anlar Ff AA hy p L
JY Loo of Lelelireiondd 7° per) NEE een, (ts!
i 7 rr 074 y bi i
— ; x
a» PF 2 plies {G44 , ) . /( / j rl / LL Vr pil L/ y rx Zz 3 ee . It
/ i — hn
~~ I ” 2
INA ANCA IOAN Dlen ( Aho/ ALLL 2%)
MN AN rf . i
VN pe ety LL A. fr y/ J LWAA LAL tinae [UAL PRIA on / Y Le, / ad
/ = il 7
™
{rte ILL ~~ mae mas > - L & pA SPL Pz
A Tats mr So il a 2) 77 Z 7 - 2.2. NE ie Sy Wal Zr per TR Pa
. rd
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C.C. A. 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled
in grades 9 - 3a of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, Ne >w Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently operated under court order. \
Signature Address
re : 3 ~
\ ) € HC Gorn 142,
3 ~~) 7) _ § 7; 4 / i . .
/ Tie atl Let pre 227 can.
dip /
A / AGN ~~ \ ¥Y P Hie } - ERT : ette oan (Tplmew 0,
Ir
J A
f 4 //
3 4 ra 2-7 fe, A ¢ ~} - ¢ 4 V4 Jr y 2 ) . vd V4 bo 2 7. § 7 7 / A LA ~ 7 / A AL -
r A / 7 / 8 J fe 0.2 i ” 1 (/ PRA gn Thr 24
pe
— / V4 ~
NEY
“i i } iid yA. 4 pre ’ / PA J [ \.2 ft: / gpa ZA) Lad A -
j J 7 3 / ( / ! a / |
|
.
”y ou
Lo a /
.
a “77 / {, f / NO¥VT, S724 »
7’ i S 4 ~/
/ / 4 / if 7
i #, /
oy
r, / ~~ 2 ) ~ ~~
y AQ 25, / J
/ A { | / f- }
[14.4 2
/ ; ( / 1 A / rd L/7 (4 ‘ 74 tL
~ o 1 - - { - Ll
, ”~ / pJ J / hy = a £7 fra - Se e oo) AAA —f AN / xX CVHALY | ~ ) / ~~ # (
id . ) 7) .
- J 4 / ¢ ul — ~ )°4 \ / 21.22. C App /] Wada
/ . / ol AL 77 = / ZA / A rE — / I)
A?
’ x -
71 po rr «©
t/ wl! - 4 7 . A : o- \ ; 4 fr A =F - ~~ A p ¢ CC 2 By
“IN A / Vi
ad 7 77 \ LE <r Le 2 te z LAL
r 4 7 [ . b, ND
A ~,
’ { LS
/ ’
— ay
:
\ ! { {
f y —- J / » ) ¢ / el uid v &
y 7
4 i ; 14 '
»
8
& J /
J P
/ /
(
7/ . sq / — A 37) porte Ce EP Ayame 7/3 : : = $7) pr 7?
p ng
2 ( pA /
/ é.
/
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
Civil Action No’ 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C. C. A. 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled '
in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently operated under court order.
Signature Address
/ 7
TT pny A.J
4
A =
( (
A, / J)
) /
/ 9 5 9 4
yf R Pos” 4 V 4
J 4 ' 4 >
7d \ / Ye J AL ] A p —
/ aa I a Ee
’ 7
4 - y vy
. / R AR La lS > 7 PL” war y a, f As
—ra Gp lt “- hg
- 7
\/ amg J
J » ¢ )/ J -
“ \, R — f
SN § an Sdn ps 4 ~
/ / -) 7s { \
Bi Z Ne { po / SE Ns
\ / / r ~ > / Ne yr ar \, of : v / - = / Cy j
7 ~~ o
-
’ 7
~ / hac”
¥ /
Fd 7 er ” he p——
" Ey
ys -
/ 40 J 7 pr 7 f / \ r
W, 7d 2 tL LL lA, NS c cL # ~ k ~~ . o# p—" . , /; [ey ) ¢ rd Ain
7 | / A Aetr y I Ps Ss Lae Ca Coho te Sa FRA I
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C. C. A. 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of‘children enrolled
in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, New Hebron High Sehoel, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently o] darted under court order.
Signature : Ts Address
RC, $A Go
SRIF v {
ad 7 7 /
20 oF : Zz. J PY,
wa 2 Lt SCE yr Farad > _/ Cee rer
-— pen 7
~Z
l) # A 22a of Ee </ 4
Cr ike he “AL CA 2) :
/ Yat
Lac AS ip
ACA (“1 ZL 2 SF / A 7-7
/ > ~~ ~~
~~ , ’ & \ . Pour fr 22 > fot . 4 ve wd
)
~ ff / y # v / &
A /
= 77 A &. EF / \v)
/ / / / ALJ — N\A ZC Vv lire
/ /
\
” 77 Te
/ / / y J 7
A Lr /
fy / <
J 4 \ery/ / al \
\
J
ay: A " Fi
>A / Z oP ar
——— : a" RA,
3
- /y /
/ ’ 7 7 pd / J ¢ ’ J . / V a / / J ~ / py TT RE AO J Py /, , F 1 ; id ir A 7 {A 71 frre) {_ ; yd 1 AALS 7 / /T ad. 0...
Ne / / —
/) Jr—,
/ ”~ { \ \ J
jd § a, (/
a PO / \ NN
ZA 1/ (A \ \ JAAS} LAL
fe
\ / is
~. /
- v ) \ w' ff {
io, REY oy bo ry \ | { . id / 4 =z ’ > ’ \ ; § 7 % -~ : ed x
/ < 7 gi WY
Aid \ ” / 4 “.
C7) / 7”) 4 Y = z / ll \ / / - / / ONY : (2h de tlo
AJ 7 — ~ / /
/ {
\ C / \ / - ] y X \ 7 al /
) re yo ld 4 Ah [i A niin on yA
— pi / —_y yi
4 Js S
vd J
: a Lf
7712. Aan ta, 4g A {
// fF
Vv
; M / ”
// 2/, ~f N yA 1 L TO» ILA ARG fere |
nited States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
ction No, 2216 (D.C.): No. 28030 and 28042 (C.C. A, 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled
es 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently operated under court order.
ooignature Address
/ ili or
Ps J ,
rl / a / dé
7) ; N Py aig 7
Lz ely Llc lls tl
() | (A {Ss
| LTA Lo, Ni e \ VZA/
— f)
A - 7 ~r {; ’
V4 1.3L, 2.7 re Zl A preg %/ po tA or LL Wadd (lL
. ” "
eM) /) 7 “77 —
4 A Al J & 22.272 IT 7 AS A gL. al
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District v
Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C. C. A. 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled
Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention,
in grades 9 -'12 of
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
constituted and as presently operated under court order.
,Slgnature Address
fa 2 “a L” 7 2-1
Ee —
J , fi d Lif
A - ”~
i 4
i ’ »/ 7
# Fl ho ’
- ww ’ -
} fief Lf 5
’ RITA MTT Coma,
J J 2.4 g 4 / 4 pe Soy (4 Pe
dal ra L =7, if Z At Vi zr
Z ~ A, le
iN Sr = / i or
(YL < cece \ LAr .
A i Se / 7
Zz // eo) J
Aa Be Eh / NEA BJ pt i
— “ “IA f ~~ - a 4 «VY
7]
-~ C
W 18, {D 7 ’y/ lr
~F So —t
ZX i ee) - SN ow ~ / $5
® »
United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District
Civil Action No, 2216 {(D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 {C.C.A. 5th)
Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled
grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in
motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello
High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School,
and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently
In
constituted and as presently operated under court order.
Signature Address
- 7 5, I Co C 4 2
ite /
1 : / id
“i Nr") :
/ / /
/ { / {
/ N /
: f y { A rd
¢ / ’ / 7 v 27 / / L/L /¢
/ /
/ & 7: 4
\ ) JS 4 // / v
/ gpl Z i
My C
() rR
IN 4 CROSS ~
| Personally appeared before me, the undersigned
ity in and for said state and county, O. R. CROSS, who first
being duly sworn states upon his oath as follows:
vy name is O, . Cross. I reside in Monticello,
LAL LAA CL
1 ADIT
LOO ULC O
“oa
geitriinentally
TE,
Knowi.ie
+11 A
Lily Le
. ~ .
l= mn Rr ~
2INIINis sion SX X es
Yow Er evra de 7
age, InIOoOTrIMation
~ 1T iE “3% Diracaniiv 1 sv
Our LV, “a . foo aX
i
L COCiiLly engaged
IC Ee
nsurance business in the f Monticello but
“ac SiimeaeTrin ~ a I “OA
id Wadd ouperinitenaent l.awrence
FP REM E 1 Seo
LAC aAtliOT])
XT” I wry Fret} 1 Arse
Was 3 leacher ang football coach
NE Hee I Ea
OUNETVY oDCHhhOOL 1 718STT y
~~
+hoa cerbhnanl ae ir nA ~ 1
M2 LAL ay A RAI Am AY AAG LL
motion to
4} T A
the L.awW~
. 1
ed in the
i Iv 3 cr - o - -~ A wo involved in this matter a adversely and
PRE Af og 4 ha a ~ - : +h id -
aliected 11 the rel notion Tor
rt ores rvE ened
aC. 1S gIranteqg.
hte rvene
coine motion to
SVULllg Iriotion- tC
and halla
Silla NIC LICL,
~~ TS 7 R\ CROSS
~~
ag
is 1 J da
f= 7
me on th
)
7 Vo
/ - /
®
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff- Appellant
Court of Appeals
Nos. 28030 and
VS. 28042
D. C. Civil Action '
No. 2216
LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al,, Defendants- Appellees
RESPONSE OF
INTERVENER-DEFENDANTS
TO MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL RELIEF
The intervener-defendants,who are identified in their
motion to intervene as defendants filed simultaneously herewith, in
their own right and on their own behalf and on behalf of their respective
children and wards and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
file this response to the motion for supplemental relief filed herein on
or about January 7, 1970, by NAACP Legal and Educational Defense
Fund, Inc.
l. Intervener-defendants admit paragraph 1 of said motion.
However, they deny the implications that the underlined words, providing
that no suggested modification may be submitted to Judge Russell before
March 1, 1970, have any application to the issues now pending before
the court.
2. Intervener-defendants admit paragraph 2 of said motion
for supplemental relief and aver affirmatively that the original HEW
plan which was ordered to be implemented by this court's order of
November 7, 1969, did contain grievous errors demanding immediate
correction. Pursuant to the invitation of this court in the pre-order
conference, the defendants-appellees moved the court for a modification
of its order of November 7, 1969, so as to correct said grievous
errors, and conferences were held with officials and representatives
of the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare and
the United States Justice Department who, after farther investigation
and consideration, agreed and approved the proposed modification and
thereupon the Court of Appeals entered an order on November 26, 1969,
modifying its order of November 7, 1969, so as to amend paragraph 2
of the HEW plan to the limited extent set forth therein and further
ordered implementation of the plan as thus amended. Said order of
November 26, 1969, was entered before the effective date of the
implementation of the plan and said original order of November 7, 1969,
as amended by order of November 26, 1969, constitutesthe basic original
order of the Court of Appeals setting forth the plan of desegregation
for Lawrence County School District and requiring effectuation and
implementation thereof not later than December 31, 1969.
3. Inteverner-defendants deny paragraph 3 of said motion.
4, Inteverner-defendants deny that the person signing
affidavits attached to said motion are representative of the Negro citizens
of Lawrence County and deny that their views represent the views of the
vast majority of such citizens. The inteverner-defendants respectfully
aver and point out to this court that the rights and privileges of all
citizens of Lawrence County are involved and should be considered by
this court, especially the constitutional rights of the children who are
attending school in the county and who will be adversely effected by the
relief sought by said motion for supplemental relief.
5. Inteverner-defendants deny paragraph 5 of said motion.
6. Inteverner-defendants deny paragraph 6 of said motion
and they aver on the contrary that orders of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit do not depend for their legality upon
endorsement or approval of any particular segment of any community
and no aliegod community or segment of community or committee has
any veto power over the lawful orders of this court. Inteverner-
defendants again aver respectfully that the rights of all citizens of
Lawrence County must be considered, especially the rights of the
children attending schools in Lawrence County School District and the
parents and guardians having primary responsibility for their eduction
and welfare.
7. Inteverner-defendants deny each and every allegation
of paragraph 7 and subparagraphs a, b, and c thereof said forth in said
motion.
8. Inteverner-defendants deny paragraph 8 of the motion
and they expressly deny that any school has been re-opened or that any
school has been closed, as represented to this court by paragraph 8 of
said motion. On the contrary, it is respectfully averred that all schools
in Lawrence County at the time of the entry of the court's order are
still being operated and absolutely no schools whatsoever have been
closed, the allegations of said motion to the contrary notwithstanding.
9. Inteverner-defendants deny that the order of the Court
of Appeals entered November 26, 1969, which modified its order of
November 7, 1969, was such a modification as was contemplated by
that portion of the order of November 7, 1969, which directed that
suggested modification be submitted to Judge Russell only after March 1,
1970. On the other hand, the modification of November 26, 1969, was
made by the Court of Appeals itself and, it is respectfully submitted,
the effect is precisely the same as if it had been set forth in the original
order as one of the exceptions similar to those specifically provided in -
said order with respect to school districts and school systems in Pike
County, Madison County, Wilkinson County, and Quitman County, which
exceptions were originally incorporated in said order of November 7,
1969. Inteverner-defendants aver, therefore, that it is not appropriate
in this case to place the burden of proof upon Lawrence County School
District, as requested in the prayer to said motion for supplemental
relief and as directed by the order of the Court of Appeals entered
January 12, 1970 (which order, we believe, through inadvertence or
misaprehension as to the nature of the modification set forth in said
motion for supplemental relief, placed the burden of proof in the
hearing upon the defendants to demonstrate that the ''subsitute plan
was devised and promulgated for educational purposes only). The
present posture of the case is that the Lawrence County School District
has fully complied with the order of the Court of Appeals and it is not
now asking this court to take any action whatsoever or to make any
further modifications of its order. The court is thus faced with the
anomalous situation that under the order of January 12, 1970, the
burden of proof has been placed upon Lawrence County School District
to support the basic order of the Court of Appeals which has already been
entered and which has been and is presently being complied with by the
Lawrence County School District. On the contrary, the movant, NAACP
Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc., is the party who seeks
affirmative action of this court and they seek a modification of the order.
Consequently, the burden of proof rightfully should be placed upon those
movants, not upon the defendants. Inteverner-defendants, therefore,
respectfully move the District Court, if it has the power, or if not, the
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, to modify its order of January 12,
1970, so as to place the burden of proof in this hearing upon the movant,
NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
10. In addition to the affirmative allegations contained
in the foregoing paragraphs, the intervener-defendants respectfully show
unto the court the following facts:
(a) The Lawrence County School District has fully and
faithfully complied with the plan of desegregation for its schools as di-
rected and ordered by this court. All schools have been integrated as
to student assignments, faculty assignments and all student activity
programs such as athletic program, band, chorus and similar student
extracurricular activities. Students are assigned to schools within
their respective geographical areas without regard to race and no student
is denied admission to such school or denied participation in any school
activity on account of race. There are seven schools in Lawrence County
and of these two schools formerly had all Negro student bodies and all
Negro faculties. The remaining five schools formerly had predominantly
White student bodies and White faculty. Today all seven schools are
operating with fully integrated student bodies composed of both Negro and
White students and fully integrated faculties composed of both Negro and
White teachers. Two of the schools have Negro principals. The ratio of
White and Negro students, teachers and principals is substantially in
accordance with the ratio of White and Negro students in the entire school
district. Although the plan of desegregation ordered by this court is
opposed by and is not agreeable to the vast majority of students, parents
and teachers, both White and Negro, they have and will continue in good
faith to exert every effort to comply with the plan and to make it work
and if permitted to continue without interference those responsible for
the operation of an adequate school system in Lawrence County will be
successful in its continued operation.
(b) The United States has now filed its response to the
motion for supplemental relief. It states that the desegregation plan
presently employed by the defendant school district has effectively de-
segregated the past dual school system in Lawrence County and that the
interest of the United States is satisfied since it has been shown that the
school district has developed and implemented an adequate system.
(c) Historically there have been three main centers
of population, education and civic activity in Lawrence County. The
largest was the county seat, Monticello. The other two were New Hebron
and Topeka-Tilton. For more than half a century high schools have been
operated at each of these centers and, in addition, an all Negro high
school was operated in Monticello. These high schools, as is typical
of rural counties probably throughout this country, not only have provided
a central point for education, training and development of the children,
but also has centers for civic and cultural activities of their respective
communities. This has permitted not only the school children themselves
to become better acquainted with their neighbors, by attending school with
children who live in the same area, but it has also permitted the parents
of children living in the same general area to become acquainted and to
share in various civic and cultural activities of the community as well as
school related functions and activities. The continued operation of high
school facilities at these three centers of activity in the community will
substantially improve the relations of all citizens within the county.
(d) The modified desegregation plan as approved and
ordered by this court and implemented by the school district puts into
actual effective practice the national policy of the preservation and
maintenance of neighborhood schools as recently announced by the
President of the United States. On the other hand, the original HEW
plan, now sought to be reinstated by the motion for supplemental relief,
would be destructive of the concept of neighborhood schools and would
be contrary to the national policy as announced and promulgated by the
President.
(e) The Monticello High School, New Hebron High
School and Topeka- Tilton High School were designed, constructed and
equipped as total high school units, including the particular type of
physical facilities required for education of Grades 9 through 12,
- BAe
- #
including laboratories, library, equipment, athletic fields with lights
for night athletic activities, dressing rooms, large parking areas and
ample land for further expansion. These facilities are not well suited
for grades 1 through 8 as provided in the original HEW plan and to
return to that proposal would require abandonment of expensive facilities
at great loss to the taxpayers of the county. The operation of three
separate high schools instead of one as proposed by said motion very
substantially broadens the base of student activities and the opportunity
for student participation in all phases of the school activity including
extracurricular activities such as chorus, dramatics, band, student
government, football, track, basketball, baseball and other sports
activities and results in a greater benefit to more students than if these
activities were restricted to only one school and resulting limited
opportunity for student participation. Monticello High School is the
newest and best equipped high school in the county and its physical
facilities are far superior to McCullough School. It is much better
suited for operation of a high school than is McCullough School and on
the other hand it is much less suited for operation of a school containing
only grades 7 and 8, as proposed by said motion.
(f) Many of the intervener-defendants live close to
and within walking distance of the New Hebron and Topeka- Tilton
schools and many of them own homes located nearby for the express
purpose of permitting their children to attend these schools. The granting
of the relief sought by said motion would require these children to be
transported by bus long distances from their homes and from their
neighborhood schools and would require many of them to ride school
buses for long periods each day, some of them two hours or longer each
day, which would result in a waste of time and energy which should be
devoted to school study. Moreover, the expensive and increased busing
which would be required by the original HEW plan would constitute an
extremely heavy financial burden upon the school district which it is
lnRan.e 10 bear,
(g) Those students in grades 9 through 12 now attending
1
either Monticello High School or New Hebron High School or Topeka-
T'ilton High School have the constitutional right to attend schools
constructed and operated near their places of residence and to force
these children to be transferred to one high school only at McCullough
™ de School in the Town of Monticello, solely for the purposes of desegregation,
rey ART Sha RRC ee Ss J ATTEN RCI, (Ee i 5 pie mor Ea pe tS CSTE ST DL Sei ; WR
Oi tAdelr Cconsiituiiona: 1rignts and will deprive them ol tnelr 1 ight to attend
z EE ER ee SE SI i ea eS See Sr TS EE SIDE ee 3
SCO! SOLiLely pecallse Or race. lhiese students ana thelr respective
varents and cuardians will. therefore. be deprived of their 1il :
pa lc lies a lil gual Clans Will, le reiroy ec, Pe aeprived Ox thelr liberty and
ll CE SP dn DL ER a LE ER I ey i RR SIE e " :
property withouil que process ol aw ana wil. deny taemm edual rotection E L J & 2
Si he El I a, Bi SR RE an ln SC LT Bel Yn dy gi 2 Ml £ .
OI .aWws guaranteed Dy tiie Constitutions oi the United States of America
Bn on Ch od N & <<
ana of the H>tate OX MViISS1ISSIDDIL.
33 EN a ATR r a ed +S gE «1. These intervener-defendants adopt the response
tr Crrinti nn thr re IRR ATH enta rE pall al fied hare in Kar v1 ATS +.
LO ITR0O1ti0on 1o1 StUuphlernientia relieir rLiiecd herein oy Lawrence county
School District together with all of the supporting affidavits filed there-
with, and make all of the same a part hereof for all purposes as if fully
set forth and copied herein. In addition, supporting affidavits to this
oo
. Intervener-defendants, while supporting the
nocLtian at dhe T ovwranrnen Cavmnbcr Seolhmel TY atime sib rg ee] position of the Lawrence County School District and opposing said
olf
motion for supplemental relief, hereby reserve unto themselves, and
4 oy = abe Ty on omy ATE An cnt rate tho wich Bow: Che ony oy srs Yo vg Fa to each of them, and do not waive, the right hereafter to seek further
Yn GAS RATIT SEN Fo ar Pg a pv TE . ody Poy PL ay, modifications of said desegregation plan and the orders of this court.
5
WHEREFORE, interverner-defendants pray that the
ng the motion for supplemental relief 0) h » C : 8 Qo
8]
O H CY
,
Fl
d
on
(L
H ©]
= +
~<
a2
i [=
CC
Fagniy TREE idly MEREEIE RSI RE, Sh TA A [ T nceval Bvsr Tas dor Nin ToT eal on i 5 Illed herein by NAACP l.egal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
~ XA vt Ti+ i y,
i. W. rieidelberg Fe 4 -
Post Office Box 1070
attiesburg, Mississippi
Of Counsel for Interverner-D ® Hh
O —
Ha
0
,
fo)
—
rs
.
pr
s
0
EW i
~ 1
Lill
e V
St 00 Ra
—~ a o
vd ALO
mm A m i we \ i NY y 8 ~N T kT 1 T
STATE B MISSISSIPPI
COUNTY OF LAWRENCE
DAVIT OF O,.R. CROSS
the undersigned
authority in and for said state and county, O. R. CROSS, who first
oy me Deing auly SWOrn states upon his oath as follows:
My name is O. R. Cross. I reside in Monticello,
1 ayia . Ty ; ; Fount Ta Lh ld} SG DL aid
ia WIrence OUiLy, IVLL ml a TITY L'anl-one ol tne appli ans 1
. (Jf rma fe SR RE Gy (Cet ly Py te oy ~
CIE notion to intervene as deifendants filed herein and one of
We 54 7 ll et Diam hl on ve zs tT ATR Er Fa rs vn pe § rv =F ]
thie intervener—-celfendantis ‘173 (ie response to motion ior suppie-
mental reli1er atracneg nereio.
res ently lain eng aged In the 1h surance business h ithe
f
v
0.
c 0 o sit 0 fo
mnt 1 Aral lA NYY A : “
Slits A, CLA) Ada bt ANI X22
x rae Qtrvarirntornr ss nt of
VV LL Was ouper intencdent oOo;
~ p CC nyTividr \
NAP AIILY iVil J
: a pnd 1 ETS -~ fig ~ PRE IN | ~ 4 P=
PDi, andl Was a teacher ang fo »tball
T
i 00:8 OF
~APrA1ta bh Ix Lfatrvviilia +» xr
tnorougn'y LAadillililAad YW Li Lid : J
~ 7 YA
Vi1SS18SS1PPL 210 Ol
4 A
~an ] 17 Th A AT aotvirt
DOD LAL UVLO Lili Lait ULo LL LULL,
remo SE Ply Si RES EA Ty fe ERR bal Ihe Ton VO TY i of a child enrolled in the Lawrence Count
mT ATTY TY or Arye od ho a EGER SPE ga TI, Ba SEE) Pe So lit, rT 1 YL
oCRo0OL t)isTT E WiOo 18 Vitalily interested 1 the 1ssuec involved 1n
TE I BR I LT RII SED © ORR, Sra NE Sol SANA, SR Te i Je ORR
EAS ITnatliey ang Wno will be aogvel Seely and dgdeirimenlta
1th e rellel SO! Supp.iéinenial r
Y 3 ~1 | ~~
o J i tid
i 1 . l L . yi i 1 3 - Aornialo ren i, oy A A Py fd ay yar CT SE eT
lhe denlais and averments contained in tne attached
“11 TYAS TEA we
br lil CA liC ILA 2
hg
®
information and belief 1RIorInation a22nG oesrierl.,
lief are true to the best of my knowledge,
O., R\ CROSS
AR Tigusine wis
SWOI'n To ana suonscriped ‘ore me on this [J day of
A i BA RR Te )
3 Ly LOoXNIrnission: us P1lI es: V4 >