Motion to Intervene as Defendants
Public Court Documents
April 16, 1970

26 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Motion to Intervene as Defendants, 1970. a38c1ef0-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/26c526ff-c69b-471e-909f-917e6610a63c/motion-to-intervene-as-defendants. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
L] $ : IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellant Court of Appeals Nos. 28030 and 28042 LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ef al., Defendants-Appellees D.C. Civil Action No. 2216 MOTION TO INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS COME NOW O. R. Cross, Hunter Butler, James Ray Calhoun, Dr. John W. Waller, Pat Shivers and Eugene Myers, together with those other persons whose signatures appear on Exhibit 1, which is attached to this motion and made a part hereof for all purposes, who are parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled in Grades 9 through 12 of Lawrence County School District and who file this motion to intervene in their own right and on their own behalf and on behalf of their respective children and wards, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and respectfully move the Court for leave to intervene as defendants in this action in order to assert the defenses set forth in their proposed response, a copy of which is attached hereto and filed herewith, to the motion for supple- mental relief filed herein on or about January 7, 1970, by the NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc. for the following grounds and reasons: 1. Applicants are parents, guardians and patrons, respectively of children, both White and Negro, enrolled in Grades 9 through 12 of Lawrence County School District, which said children are presently attending one of the following schools of the District: Monticello High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center. The purpose of this intervention is to seek the maintenance and preservation of said schools as they are pre- sently constituted and as they are presently being operated under orders of this Court and to oppose the motion for supplemental relief filed herein on or about Tanusey 7, 1970, by the NAACP Legal and Educational Fund, Inc. by which motion for supplemental relief said Fund is attempting to obtain an order of this Court requiring that all students of the Lawrence County School District in Grades 9 through 12 be forced to attend McCullough High School and other changes incidental thereto. 2. Appliants file this motion for leave to intervene as defendants in their own right and on their own behalf and on behalf of their respective children and wards and on behalf of all others similarly situated who likewise oppose said efforts of said Fund, as reflected by the motion for supplemental relief. The class of persons similarly situated is so numerous that joinder of all members is impractical, there are questions of law or fact common to the class, the claims and defenses asserted and to be asserted by applicants as representative parties are typical of the claims and defenses of the class, the representa- tive parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class and the relief sought by said motion for supplemental relief will adversely effect the constitutional rights of all members of the class. 3. The applicants, and their respective children and wards, and those whom they represent, have valuable constitutional rights which are threatened by the action of said NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc. The children have a right to the best public education possible and the right to attend schools in their respective areas of residence without discrimination on account of race, and the right to education by duly elected officials without interference. The granting of the relief sought by said supplemental motion will violate the constitutional rights of said children and these applicants and those they represent under the equal protection and due process provisions of the United States Constitution and related provisions of the Mississippi Constitution. The hearing of said motion for supplementary relief, which seeks relief vitally affecting these applicants and their children and others similarly situated and which will amount to a violation of their constitutional rights, without an opportunity to be heard with respect thereto of itself would constitute a violation of their rights and the taking of their liberty and property without due process of law. 4. Other reasons set forth in the response to said motion of for supplemental relief attached hereto and filed herewith. 5. Supporting affidavit is annexed hereto as an exhibit and made a part hereof for all purposes. re Fh ME oo Melle)” R. W. Heidelberg / Post Cffice Box 1070 Hattiesburg, Mississippi Of Counsel for Applicants J. P. Patterson Post Office Box 11 Monticello, Mississippi Francis Vining Monticello, Mississippi R. W. Heidelberg Heidelberg, Sutherland & McKenzie Post Office Box 1070 Hattiesburg, Mississippl 39401 Attorneys for Applicants (Intervener-Defendants) NOTICE OF MOTION Notice is hereby given that the foregoing motion for leave to intervene as defendants will be called up for hearing before the Honorable Dan M. Russell, Jr., United States District Judge, at the United States Courthouse in the City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, at 9:00 a. m., April 20, 1970, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard. WITNESS my signature on this /& A day of April, A. D., 1970. EH Lo or Attorney for Applicants (Ylervener- Defendants) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned attorney for Applicants (Intervener- Defendants), do hereby certify that I have, this date, served the fore- going motion and notice, together with supporting affidavit and attached reply to motion for supplemental relief, by mailing a true copy of each by United States mail, properly addressed and postage prepaid to each of the following counsel of record: Honorable David L.. Norman Honorable Robert Hauberg Assistant Attorney General United States Attorney Department of Justice Federal Building Washington, D. C. Jackson, Mississippi Honorable Melvyn R. Leventhal Honorable Jack Greenberg Honorable Reuben V. Anderson Honorable Norman Chachkin Honorable Fred L. Banks, Jr. Honorable Jonathan Shapiro Honorable John A. Nichols Suite 2030 538 1/2 North Farish Street 10 Columbus Circle Jackson, Mississippi 390202 New York, New York 10019 Attorneys for NAACP Legal Attorneys for NAACP Legal and Educational Defense and Educational Defense Fund,. Inc. Fund, Inc. Honorable James S. George Honorable Robert G. Turnage Post Office Box 493 Monticello, Mississippi Monticello, Mississippi Attorney for Lawrence County Attorney for Lawrence County School District School District Honorable M. M. Roberts Fifth Floor, Citizens Bank Building Hattiesburg, Mississippi Attorney for Lawrence County School District WITNESS my signature on this 64 day of April, A. D., 1970. er 1 LY a R. W. Heidelbergy/ % ~~ United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District Civil Action No, 2216 (D.C.): No, 28030 and 28042 (C,C. A, 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently operated under court order. ‘ ~~ Signature Address {7s 9 A // £ 3 ray A 72 i ai a: # rl ¥i 7 / Bis Z.&3 y ( / 7 2 Fy ¥ ( 3 [A i / 4 3 ) 5 / 7 J Vy, ; A \ } A) / ~ y / J ; Th / Vi or A 2s, / 7’ Z Cr (pr 7 <h A 4 A — wom ’ / / NOS, y 8 pr) AA “22 shy 4 \ ’ LEARN | | q£ (ac hooallo Miss 7 / “/ 77 pr / A SA A ¢ / 4 tai 4 wn awd Ua Apa - C.. JA F200 2 ret Sozs 7 4 . i - + wif ~~ [1S A-Cel\p YWilzZ- , C . 2 Yard’ Lael 227 eta = on DoH rz 2 : Zz " 7 2X RLY ATH AA ELLY For nh AAS rt lr V ze pr [SY f 7 Pad” / ed BA = ¥ 7 v : : et > / (0D ) R77 3s Snr Tt IY mr le 200 SYN Tn - ” fl uly A / ti ih #4 ym - (id 2 [lade lt / Lo LAA Slide» H » \ h / ; \ ” a 4 y 3 2 “ ed ” 7, I 2) 7 gz 4 J 7 ZN SOA Cs Zc A hw. 2 Zoog in Wl Ae, 0; IE §Z / A oz Le. 7 Loon / rot) Vande a ~ ph af . , J ws 7 oo pa tv V7" Lir 2 ANN Cor Yep OR Je LL J¢ 9) Fidei > : Z Jo [} i Zz /! - y y - - ’ - - . v / > 4 4 : , 1 Loe st Jr , S Zs Wi Brrr ™\ - ’ y rf v % § rs / i [5 ff “) 7 4 he 2! yA —_y 10 AAS A rel le LIT re i cs ig : / f/f va gj / { ™N ’ T— [is c . Py i. . ’ Ly ) y ; - — Hig , / 1: ja 1" of b V J 3 YY : / ) +) ” v4 aw. —- A ds W \ J ’ ae Wd / JN zl ’ ssi ’ ‘ / 37 gi ’ 5 be £1 /” « 4 rH fo EXHIBIT 1 (consisting of 11 pages) United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District Civil Action No, 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C.C. A, 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently operated under court order. Signature Address / : [ 7 / bi / a . / F ; -— / / . J / ” £L 7 £ ’ St \/ Sf A / ff se J Pp rd Z, / / / LN pif / SAT ey BN a [ \ 7 Lg Wa : Al Ver ~All , ; vi 7 7 .- > / A ri : Vv ) y ’ g . g Lai” / / - ( A / Li A 1 2 / uid le) 3 Ye. 2) dae U {LCi : or Cero l CO [Ser t/ a 44 SA aa gi JI At 2dr l rl A Va BP 4 J od PPA Af es, ins = 7 - 7 7 A 7 ))/) A 2 / / S: : Z i'd /) LE) Ce Ce (rss 222 az = Fire Le /. )) d / ra ly — "a / / C : . i> / ~~) i / rd ; / / { £ oS ~ 22 / Lh ~~ A) 2D = ” 4 4 N of / le / Cr 74 7) / ¥ / / / / s | SL - . - A . i C LL CA ZL Y 7 di < a » 7 1S APE 7 4 : . po jig 7 PA 4 <” ~~ _, / / Fi ot 4’. LZ f A Z 77 | 7¢ ye Pin 7 , \ 1 { > ; ) jis A “ def ~ b, / als / FAS SS) J 7 7 ) / / fF] 7 . yi) <r A UD ea toca lin 2.1L oe » po cy ? -7 L \ # ; oa }i ” Ei or ) / > a / / / ) - - 2 gk, pi gf / / 7 // eA ws AL J vii ? ds Sr - » / fe : ‘ ~rt / / Jy rf Smtr / Nara Al 223 24. J ) yeti f a a \ : of — 4 / . 4 i \ 1) {ry = A {i 7/7 Lo A¢ £L yi Ara, ’/ ~~) a” 3 ( Va 1 / / J N ” : y al : / / my [ \ / ’ / » y 7 / Lr / {A i / J lr ( //7 4 ALAA LAL BY 5 7 j — ’ // , 5 / A Va Td 2 FE V4 r bi A 1 / Vl MA Ler rt ’/ . i) — / / o 23 i 4 Peli iy ~~ i ne ir, or ” rail po, 7 bo i 7’ / / / } ae a - § A = {-/ 1 : 7 ' 4 7 IAP i ; 7. 3 of . Mf / 7 J & Goal! a A fre / /: 7% LC or / Wa FA / { SAL — iy A \ a Io fat], 7 / 11 J [ C., ry: 3 Fal f J Ui BE ITU AL ¢ 2 Lo A ) Zt f Jf —pn / \ pod by / d } L { 7 74 A C/A Br {Ly 7 [i 74 - ) 3 - / or a i % Zz } [ / / ; ) ~, a { N " Si # > i Critr of of Rr a 7:4 ( / / i - J) - / 4 : fit / \ C - { \ \ | { oS \ / / / ’ y Vib / A AA j jot rf 4 (JV rs At Lh yp) ys Ho J / wate EY FA or Lh "TN AA" LA wef Fk od | gy, : al. - - —. - mi a [4g J A y:/ ‘8. ps / Vi y Vd 4 ( . WotR <} w.q. 1 A+ i eo Fig PL Va nT dl a United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C. ); No. 28030 and 28042 (C.C. A. 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently operated under court order. Signature ” - Jf Cll ~~ A ll - iN ? | " fl [> A We LaAlUGAAe Address Senile, Teas Lhe {lit Loli Lodlertindd ) oi ) 14 Lif / /, 7 Fh 7, £2 Ll iP LLY d 7 74 vol z / re 27 \ [Zor vl rz 277 LL] 1] /) ~ 1 pd J oA of et J © 7 tA “ N/M SP LL, A Yio ) ¢ La , ~~ INA BA A MWA, Ck A = // - YY, £=\ . 4 AAS” 1 les 7 lL LA Re J Vo Z/ 3 / , hl fa, v/f 28S ey RA // / / / hs Jz 2. (Fa ss 7 ee — y= y . ~) 71 / NACE {ese 74 >1//, / AKL fx Pa 2% zy vd : 7 1 7 Ee 7 7 / < ot CCA A | 7 | | Noa 7 N\/ Fe L \ | A X Y.¢ 0 ) IN OM x00 i ~ Ny © Pd Ld Vall a FINS rr / 7) / “NrIo€e_'T WAI od A i of ps g76 Llu Xl. yh il He ON IN * gay (i = / /, 7 / s A) " a 4 (/ 7 > SAC / FZ J Cn AR pratt ay Td TT ari Peed fs Fins i Noritz Us : Hee Va Las VOI e wen /~ Zr lr re ANN Wr A, 2) er Zeawr ll, TV), sen bc 3 Ln . ad 7 Noataoe tts |, 770iad ir SN, Wh eas i ) Lon EX 2. Lo ae Mone ZLeoclte Ea A ae 20 lt United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C. ); No. 28030 and 28042 (C. C. A. 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently operated under court order. Signature Address / o i PE ' ~~ ‘7 / 4 1] / / / 7 / / i / y SN. ff \ / ‘ x ~~ S——“go— —~——t £ J ’ Ya 7 A J - pr ! - - 7 - y 4 & - - J J ~ \ -y rily X or ! Li ) — ra / by i Ci - ~~ / ) . A > 4 . " / / \\ Zz '} © D / ; 4 v4 J |} f.. \2 —pn pe I ” / f y / / 7 / 7 4 -~ } fe 2 - oo - / . Wi Ar SN ¢ J 7 Bm / SA fe ler loo - 4 ry \ EE A Pe / 7 / / ’ J { p \ —~ rd . \ =) Fi CY 21 77 ¢ / re — a. rv, —" X y ~~ p, ’ a ; ~ / go J of a \ y . i ~ A lL ” id OO dt i Pd J A 4 A / ” / 7 7A — ve Tn hi. iF. 7 -, i J ~~ - —-— 4 ] ' 7) / ‘ i , 27 » —3"7 Z, Ww. t/ 7 7, — \ ~ \ : 3 \ 7 \. if C / , . \ p ” ’ v a rd J . Fox 5 lec Ze 22. Pl Py Wud — / ”/ A 7 / / Joh A / Narn / . ; }-.1 y / | { | ZS] ly : ( F J | / |! - - fo - 7 yd ALLL ’ Yr AT . won os NN —" ———— gf J 1 7 / ) / fr / / / J i { Ef Sf FAC / / fh / / ‘ 2 i / \ v ™. \ — - i y Pd 7 A i amr 4 2 iL > - s > / Ay N 7 / 2 7} J \ / / . ah A FAN A of [74 / pe / , pe J - ® o n 27 Az. ¢ I CASE Ae 2 ‘L ] oi 4 — pt mm PRA ; ’; a — > - / . - / ~ , 4 BAT I poe - — ¥ - “ ro Pe fy iol » Y — A —————— -— = - WE —-— br imi rath, an —— ”~ ' L 4 / 7 rd “3 4 il J rd J Re > J S /7 / 8 4 // J = // ’ United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District Civil Action No, 2216 (D.C. );: No. 28030 and 28042 (C.,C. A, 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently operated under court order. Signature Address Vol / / ” / — Ca / Vd 2 A ol ed ; rif a ( pe V4 J / Fe 7, Cl 0 Ae dr" 7) — / \ ¥, Jie) / re / 7: 23” dy Zz: 4 Lf 2 ye: Salis n J sar, g oa 4 id J / / “2 7}] / Z /S ~~ / ’ ”? Nc” ¥ J } 7 w - SS Ld , = ” me Sg : — i rf / / a xt 1, / X . - { . er / / J A Lr SZ FAREED of ) ¥ AA A 5 4 arc : ~ — 2 ’ / ) : —~ ; yA 2 AS ee /, Fr “1 ; p / / {A ; { {- oh Le y 2 ZL ez 7 : 5 : : if $F / J f / ~~ —-_— = . + | N————— Cot oJ 185 we pili THF {3 ) < : AJA fr v4 ir AAA J | AALS iT Son A 7) 1 rd] i = ’ ie . N y ; / ” 54 / / §~ / a / \ A ~ 5 Lf Pi J J v4 /) I. 2 737 lL Fla LLL (E CLL, Slr, - Fil ’ \/ rr y 7 aa : 4 / / &/f . pr / HF bi 7 ~ // i 77» LEE 2 2 : ’ ze vk / 2 = A : ’ 4 ; ; : Load 1 Fi f » : = / ) pr { \ SL -~ { ' 4 - / / ) 7 » g ” ; a WL § ; x 1/0" A : ; pa -~ ¥ / V4 1 { vi Y A 1s {/ ? 9 f(s . { /7, 2 V2 } Ntzs. ~ ~~ — J il pL a g 4 * i lf x — X ro, 4 yy : J ) —_r3"7]. >The 2) A Cz LT / Sl Z 7 / / 2 ~ Vi : A / +) ~ — / — uh EL i ”) Gy J / ’\ 7 el, Se 7] LB] yy aY C tL, ”) Cong / 4 in EERE PT anlar Ff AA hy p L JY Loo of Lelelireiondd 7° per) NEE een, (ts! i 7 rr 074 y bi i — ; x a» PF 2 plies {G44 , ) . /( / j rl / LL Vr pil L/ y rx Zz 3 ee . It / i — hn ~~ I ” 2 INA ANCA IOAN Dlen ( Aho/ ALLL 2%) MN AN rf . i VN pe ety LL A. fr y/ J LWAA LAL tinae [UAL PRIA on / Y Le, / ad / = il 7 ™ {rte ILL ~~ mae mas > - L & pA SPL Pz A Tats mr So il a 2) 77 Z 7 - 2.2. NE ie Sy Wal Zr per TR Pa . rd United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C.C. A. 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled in grades 9 - 3a of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, Ne >w Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently operated under court order. \ Signature Address re : 3 ~ \ ) € HC Gorn 142, 3 ~~) 7) _ § 7; 4 / i . . / Tie atl Let pre 227 can. dip / A / AGN ~~ \ ¥Y P Hie } - ERT : ette oan (Tplmew 0, Ir J A f 4 // 3 4 ra 2-7 fe, A ¢ ~} - ¢ 4 V4 Jr y 2 ) . vd V4 bo 2 7. § 7 7 / A LA ~ 7 / A AL - r A / 7 / 8 J fe 0.2 i ” 1 (/ PRA gn Thr 24 pe — / V4 ~ NEY “i i } iid yA. 4 pre ’ / PA J [ \.2 ft: / gpa ZA) Lad A - j J 7 3 / ( / ! a / | | . ”y ou Lo a / . a “77 / {, f / NO¥VT, S724 » 7’ i S 4 ~/ / / 4 / if 7 i #, / oy r, / ~~ 2 ) ~ ~~ y AQ 25, / J / A { | / f- } [14.4 2 / ; ( / 1 A / rd L/7 (4 ‘ 74 tL ~ o 1 - - { - Ll , ”~ / pJ J / hy = a £7 fra - Se e oo) AAA —f AN / xX CVHALY | ~ ) / ~~ # ( id . ) 7) . - J 4 / ¢ ul — ~ )°4 \ / 21.22. C App /] Wada / . / ol AL 77 = / ZA / A rE — / I) A? ’ x - 71 po rr «© t/ wl! - 4 7 . A : o- \ ; 4 fr A =F - ~~ A p ¢ CC 2 By “IN A / Vi ad 7 77 \ LE <r Le 2 te z LAL r 4 7 [ . b, ND A ~, ’ { LS / ’ — ay : \ ! { { f y —- J / » ) ¢ / el uid v & y 7 4 i ; 14 ' » 8 & J / J P / / ( 7/ . sq / — A 37) porte Ce EP Ayame 7/3 : : = $7) pr 7? p ng 2 ( pA / / é. / United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District Civil Action No’ 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C. C. A. 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled ' in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently operated under court order. Signature Address / 7 TT pny A.J 4 A = ( ( A, / J) ) / / 9 5 9 4 yf R Pos” 4 V 4 J 4 ' 4 > 7d \ / Ye J AL ] A p — / aa I a Ee ’ 7 4 - y vy . / R AR La lS > 7 PL” war y a, f As —ra Gp lt “- hg - 7 \/ amg J J » ¢ )/ J - “ \, R — f SN § an Sdn ps 4 ~ / / -) 7s { \ Bi Z Ne { po / SE Ns \ / / r ~ > / Ne yr ar \, of : v / - = / Cy j 7 ~~ o - ’ 7 ~ / hac” ¥ / Fd 7 er ” he p—— " Ey ys - / 40 J 7 pr 7 f / \ r W, 7d 2 tL LL lA, NS c cL # ~ k ~~ . o# p—" . , /; [ey ) ¢ rd Ain 7 | / A Aetr y I Ps Ss Lae Ca Coho te Sa FRA I United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C. C. A. 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of‘children enrolled in grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, New Hebron High Sehoel, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently o] darted under court order. Signature : Ts Address RC, $A Go SRIF v { ad 7 7 / 20 oF : Zz. J PY, wa 2 Lt SCE yr Farad > _/ Cee rer -— pen 7 ~Z l) # A 22a of Ee </ 4 Cr ike he “AL CA 2) : / Yat Lac AS ip ACA (“1 ZL 2 SF / A 7-7 / > ~~ ~~ ~~ , ’ & \ . Pour fr 22 > fot . 4 ve wd ) ~ ff / y # v / & A / = 77 A &. EF / \v) / / / / ALJ — N\A ZC Vv lire / / \ ” 77 Te / / / y J 7 A Lr / fy / < J 4 \ery/ / al \ \ J ay: A " Fi >A / Z oP ar ——— : a" RA, 3 - /y / / ’ 7 7 pd / J ¢ ’ J . / V a / / J ~ / py TT RE AO J Py /, , F 1 ; id ir A 7 {A 71 frre) {_ ; yd 1 AALS 7 / /T ad. 0... Ne / / — /) Jr—, / ”~ { \ \ J jd § a, (/ a PO / \ NN ZA 1/ (A \ \ JAAS} LAL fe \ / is ~. / - v ) \ w' ff { io, REY oy bo ry \ | { . id / 4 =z ’ > ’ \ ; § 7 % -~ : ed x / < 7 gi WY Aid \ ” / 4 “. C7) / 7”) 4 Y = z / ll \ / / - / / ONY : (2h de tlo AJ 7 — ~ / / / { \ C / \ / - ] y X \ 7 al / ) re yo ld 4 Ah [i A niin on yA — pi / —_y yi 4 Js S vd J : a Lf 7712. Aan ta, 4g A { // fF Vv ; M / ” // 2/, ~f N yA 1 L TO» ILA ARG fere | nited States of America vs. Lawrence County School District ction No, 2216 (D.C.): No. 28030 and 28042 (C.C. A, 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled es 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently operated under court order. ooignature Address / ili or Ps J , rl / a / dé 7) ; N Py aig 7 Lz ely Llc lls tl () | (A {Ss | LTA Lo, Ni e \ VZA/ — f) A - 7 ~r {; ’ V4 1.3L, 2.7 re Zl A preg %/ po tA or LL Wadd (lL . ” " eM) /) 7 “77 — 4 A Al J & 22.272 IT 7 AS A gL. al United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District v Civil Action No. 2216 (D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 (C. C. A. 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, in grades 9 -'12 of High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently constituted and as presently operated under court order. ,Slgnature Address fa 2 “a L” 7 2-1 Ee — J , fi d Lif A - ”~ i 4 i ’ »/ 7 # Fl ho ’ - ww ’ - } fief Lf 5 ’ RITA MTT Coma, J J 2.4 g 4 / 4 pe Soy (4 Pe dal ra L =7, if Z At Vi zr Z ~ A, le iN Sr = / i or (YL < cece \ LAr . A i Se / 7 Zz // eo) J Aa Be Eh / NEA BJ pt i — “ “IA f ~~ - a 4 «VY 7] -~ C W 18, {D 7 ’y/ lr ~F So —t ZX i ee) - SN ow ~ / $5 ® » United States of America vs. Lawrence County School District Civil Action No, 2216 {(D.C.); No. 28030 and 28042 {C.C.A. 5th) Signatures of parents, guardians and patrons of children enrolled grades 9 - 12 of Lawrence County School District joining in motion for intervention, seeking to maintain and preserve Monticello High School, New Hebron High School, Topeka- Tilton High School, and McCullough Attendance Center, as these schools are presently In constituted and as presently operated under court order. Signature Address - 7 5, I Co C 4 2 ite / 1 : / id “i Nr") : / / / / { / { / N / : f y { A rd ¢ / ’ / 7 v 27 / / L/L /¢ / / / & 7: 4 \ ) JS 4 // / v / gpl Z i My C () rR IN 4 CROSS ~ | Personally appeared before me, the undersigned ity in and for said state and county, O. R. CROSS, who first being duly sworn states upon his oath as follows: vy name is O, . Cross. I reside in Monticello, LAL LAA CL 1 ADIT LOO ULC O “oa geitriinentally TE, Knowi.ie +11 A Lily Le . ~ . l= mn Rr ~ 2INIINis sion SX X es Yow Er evra de 7 age, InIOoOTrIMation ~ 1T iE “3% Diracaniiv 1 sv Our LV, “a . foo aX i L COCiiLly engaged IC Ee nsurance business in the f Monticello but “ac SiimeaeTrin ~ a I “OA id Wadd ouperinitenaent l.awrence FP REM E 1 Seo LAC aAtliOT]) XT” I wry Fret} 1 Arse Was 3 leacher ang football coach NE Hee I Ea OUNETVY oDCHhhOOL 1 718STT y ~~ +hoa cerbhnanl ae ir nA ~ 1 M2 LAL ay A RAI Am AY AAG LL motion to 4} T A the L.awW~ . 1 ed in the i Iv 3 cr - o - -~ A wo involved in this matter a adversely and PRE Af og 4 ha a ~ - : +h id - aliected 11 the rel notion Tor rt ores rvE ened aC. 1S gIranteqg. hte rvene coine motion to SVULllg Iriotion- tC and halla Silla NIC LICL, ~~ TS 7 R\ CROSS ~~ ag is 1 J da f= 7 me on th ) 7 Vo / - / ® IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellant Court of Appeals Nos. 28030 and VS. 28042 D. C. Civil Action ' No. 2216 LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al,, Defendants- Appellees RESPONSE OF INTERVENER-DEFENDANTS TO MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL RELIEF The intervener-defendants,who are identified in their motion to intervene as defendants filed simultaneously herewith, in their own right and on their own behalf and on behalf of their respective children and wards and on behalf of all others similarly situated, file this response to the motion for supplemental relief filed herein on or about January 7, 1970, by NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc. l. Intervener-defendants admit paragraph 1 of said motion. However, they deny the implications that the underlined words, providing that no suggested modification may be submitted to Judge Russell before March 1, 1970, have any application to the issues now pending before the court. 2. Intervener-defendants admit paragraph 2 of said motion for supplemental relief and aver affirmatively that the original HEW plan which was ordered to be implemented by this court's order of November 7, 1969, did contain grievous errors demanding immediate correction. Pursuant to the invitation of this court in the pre-order conference, the defendants-appellees moved the court for a modification of its order of November 7, 1969, so as to correct said grievous errors, and conferences were held with officials and representatives of the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare and the United States Justice Department who, after farther investigation and consideration, agreed and approved the proposed modification and thereupon the Court of Appeals entered an order on November 26, 1969, modifying its order of November 7, 1969, so as to amend paragraph 2 of the HEW plan to the limited extent set forth therein and further ordered implementation of the plan as thus amended. Said order of November 26, 1969, was entered before the effective date of the implementation of the plan and said original order of November 7, 1969, as amended by order of November 26, 1969, constitutesthe basic original order of the Court of Appeals setting forth the plan of desegregation for Lawrence County School District and requiring effectuation and implementation thereof not later than December 31, 1969. 3. Inteverner-defendants deny paragraph 3 of said motion. 4, Inteverner-defendants deny that the person signing affidavits attached to said motion are representative of the Negro citizens of Lawrence County and deny that their views represent the views of the vast majority of such citizens. The inteverner-defendants respectfully aver and point out to this court that the rights and privileges of all citizens of Lawrence County are involved and should be considered by this court, especially the constitutional rights of the children who are attending school in the county and who will be adversely effected by the relief sought by said motion for supplemental relief. 5. Inteverner-defendants deny paragraph 5 of said motion. 6. Inteverner-defendants deny paragraph 6 of said motion and they aver on the contrary that orders of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit do not depend for their legality upon endorsement or approval of any particular segment of any community and no aliegod community or segment of community or committee has any veto power over the lawful orders of this court. Inteverner- defendants again aver respectfully that the rights of all citizens of Lawrence County must be considered, especially the rights of the children attending schools in Lawrence County School District and the parents and guardians having primary responsibility for their eduction and welfare. 7. Inteverner-defendants deny each and every allegation of paragraph 7 and subparagraphs a, b, and c thereof said forth in said motion. 8. Inteverner-defendants deny paragraph 8 of the motion and they expressly deny that any school has been re-opened or that any school has been closed, as represented to this court by paragraph 8 of said motion. On the contrary, it is respectfully averred that all schools in Lawrence County at the time of the entry of the court's order are still being operated and absolutely no schools whatsoever have been closed, the allegations of said motion to the contrary notwithstanding. 9. Inteverner-defendants deny that the order of the Court of Appeals entered November 26, 1969, which modified its order of November 7, 1969, was such a modification as was contemplated by that portion of the order of November 7, 1969, which directed that suggested modification be submitted to Judge Russell only after March 1, 1970. On the other hand, the modification of November 26, 1969, was made by the Court of Appeals itself and, it is respectfully submitted, the effect is precisely the same as if it had been set forth in the original order as one of the exceptions similar to those specifically provided in - said order with respect to school districts and school systems in Pike County, Madison County, Wilkinson County, and Quitman County, which exceptions were originally incorporated in said order of November 7, 1969. Inteverner-defendants aver, therefore, that it is not appropriate in this case to place the burden of proof upon Lawrence County School District, as requested in the prayer to said motion for supplemental relief and as directed by the order of the Court of Appeals entered January 12, 1970 (which order, we believe, through inadvertence or misaprehension as to the nature of the modification set forth in said motion for supplemental relief, placed the burden of proof in the hearing upon the defendants to demonstrate that the ''subsitute plan was devised and promulgated for educational purposes only). The present posture of the case is that the Lawrence County School District has fully complied with the order of the Court of Appeals and it is not now asking this court to take any action whatsoever or to make any further modifications of its order. The court is thus faced with the anomalous situation that under the order of January 12, 1970, the burden of proof has been placed upon Lawrence County School District to support the basic order of the Court of Appeals which has already been entered and which has been and is presently being complied with by the Lawrence County School District. On the contrary, the movant, NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc., is the party who seeks affirmative action of this court and they seek a modification of the order. Consequently, the burden of proof rightfully should be placed upon those movants, not upon the defendants. Inteverner-defendants, therefore, respectfully move the District Court, if it has the power, or if not, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, to modify its order of January 12, 1970, so as to place the burden of proof in this hearing upon the movant, NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc. 10. In addition to the affirmative allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs, the intervener-defendants respectfully show unto the court the following facts: (a) The Lawrence County School District has fully and faithfully complied with the plan of desegregation for its schools as di- rected and ordered by this court. All schools have been integrated as to student assignments, faculty assignments and all student activity programs such as athletic program, band, chorus and similar student extracurricular activities. Students are assigned to schools within their respective geographical areas without regard to race and no student is denied admission to such school or denied participation in any school activity on account of race. There are seven schools in Lawrence County and of these two schools formerly had all Negro student bodies and all Negro faculties. The remaining five schools formerly had predominantly White student bodies and White faculty. Today all seven schools are operating with fully integrated student bodies composed of both Negro and White students and fully integrated faculties composed of both Negro and White teachers. Two of the schools have Negro principals. The ratio of White and Negro students, teachers and principals is substantially in accordance with the ratio of White and Negro students in the entire school district. Although the plan of desegregation ordered by this court is opposed by and is not agreeable to the vast majority of students, parents and teachers, both White and Negro, they have and will continue in good faith to exert every effort to comply with the plan and to make it work and if permitted to continue without interference those responsible for the operation of an adequate school system in Lawrence County will be successful in its continued operation. (b) The United States has now filed its response to the motion for supplemental relief. It states that the desegregation plan presently employed by the defendant school district has effectively de- segregated the past dual school system in Lawrence County and that the interest of the United States is satisfied since it has been shown that the school district has developed and implemented an adequate system. (c) Historically there have been three main centers of population, education and civic activity in Lawrence County. The largest was the county seat, Monticello. The other two were New Hebron and Topeka-Tilton. For more than half a century high schools have been operated at each of these centers and, in addition, an all Negro high school was operated in Monticello. These high schools, as is typical of rural counties probably throughout this country, not only have provided a central point for education, training and development of the children, but also has centers for civic and cultural activities of their respective communities. This has permitted not only the school children themselves to become better acquainted with their neighbors, by attending school with children who live in the same area, but it has also permitted the parents of children living in the same general area to become acquainted and to share in various civic and cultural activities of the community as well as school related functions and activities. The continued operation of high school facilities at these three centers of activity in the community will substantially improve the relations of all citizens within the county. (d) The modified desegregation plan as approved and ordered by this court and implemented by the school district puts into actual effective practice the national policy of the preservation and maintenance of neighborhood schools as recently announced by the President of the United States. On the other hand, the original HEW plan, now sought to be reinstated by the motion for supplemental relief, would be destructive of the concept of neighborhood schools and would be contrary to the national policy as announced and promulgated by the President. (e) The Monticello High School, New Hebron High School and Topeka- Tilton High School were designed, constructed and equipped as total high school units, including the particular type of physical facilities required for education of Grades 9 through 12, - BAe - # including laboratories, library, equipment, athletic fields with lights for night athletic activities, dressing rooms, large parking areas and ample land for further expansion. These facilities are not well suited for grades 1 through 8 as provided in the original HEW plan and to return to that proposal would require abandonment of expensive facilities at great loss to the taxpayers of the county. The operation of three separate high schools instead of one as proposed by said motion very substantially broadens the base of student activities and the opportunity for student participation in all phases of the school activity including extracurricular activities such as chorus, dramatics, band, student government, football, track, basketball, baseball and other sports activities and results in a greater benefit to more students than if these activities were restricted to only one school and resulting limited opportunity for student participation. Monticello High School is the newest and best equipped high school in the county and its physical facilities are far superior to McCullough School. It is much better suited for operation of a high school than is McCullough School and on the other hand it is much less suited for operation of a school containing only grades 7 and 8, as proposed by said motion. (f) Many of the intervener-defendants live close to and within walking distance of the New Hebron and Topeka- Tilton schools and many of them own homes located nearby for the express purpose of permitting their children to attend these schools. The granting of the relief sought by said motion would require these children to be transported by bus long distances from their homes and from their neighborhood schools and would require many of them to ride school buses for long periods each day, some of them two hours or longer each day, which would result in a waste of time and energy which should be devoted to school study. Moreover, the expensive and increased busing which would be required by the original HEW plan would constitute an extremely heavy financial burden upon the school district which it is lnRan.e 10 bear, (g) Those students in grades 9 through 12 now attending 1 either Monticello High School or New Hebron High School or Topeka- T'ilton High School have the constitutional right to attend schools constructed and operated near their places of residence and to force these children to be transferred to one high school only at McCullough ™ de School in the Town of Monticello, solely for the purposes of desegregation, rey ART Sha RRC ee Ss J ATTEN RCI, (Ee i 5 pie mor Ea pe tS CSTE ST DL Sei ; WR Oi tAdelr Cconsiituiiona: 1rignts and will deprive them ol tnelr 1 ight to attend z EE ER ee SE SI i ea eS See Sr TS EE SIDE ee 3 SCO! SOLiLely pecallse Or race. lhiese students ana thelr respective varents and cuardians will. therefore. be deprived of their 1il : pa lc lies a lil gual Clans Will, le reiroy ec, Pe aeprived Ox thelr liberty and ll CE SP dn DL ER a LE ER I ey i RR SIE e " : property withouil que process ol aw ana wil. deny taemm edual rotection E L J & 2 Si he El I a, Bi SR RE an ln SC LT Bel Yn dy gi 2 Ml £ . OI .aWws guaranteed Dy tiie Constitutions oi the United States of America Bn on Ch od N & << ana of the H>tate OX MViISS1ISSIDDIL. 33 EN a ATR r a ed +S gE «1. These intervener-defendants adopt the response tr Crrinti nn thr re IRR ATH enta rE pall al fied hare in Kar v1 ATS +. LO ITR0O1ti0on 1o1 StUuphlernientia relieir rLiiecd herein oy Lawrence county School District together with all of the supporting affidavits filed there- with, and make all of the same a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth and copied herein. In addition, supporting affidavits to this oo . Intervener-defendants, while supporting the nocLtian at dhe T ovwranrnen Cavmnbcr Seolhmel TY atime sib rg ee] position of the Lawrence County School District and opposing said olf motion for supplemental relief, hereby reserve unto themselves, and 4 oy = abe Ty on omy ATE An cnt rate tho wich Bow: Che ony oy srs Yo vg Fa to each of them, and do not waive, the right hereafter to seek further Yn GAS RATIT SEN Fo ar Pg a pv TE . ody Poy PL ay, modifications of said desegregation plan and the orders of this court. 5 WHEREFORE, interverner-defendants pray that the ng the motion for supplemental relief 0) h » C : 8 Qo 8] O H CY , Fl d on (L H ©] = + ~< a2 i [= CC Fagniy TREE idly MEREEIE RSI RE, Sh TA A [ T nceval Bvsr Tas dor Nin ToT eal on i 5 Illed herein by NAACP l.egal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc. ~ XA vt Ti+ i y, i. W. rieidelberg Fe 4 - Post Office Box 1070 attiesburg, Mississippi Of Counsel for Interverner-D ® Hh O — Ha 0 , fo) — rs . pr s 0 EW i ~ 1 Lill e V St 00 Ra —~ a o vd ALO mm A m i we \ i NY y 8 ~N T kT 1 T STATE B MISSISSIPPI COUNTY OF LAWRENCE DAVIT OF O,.R. CROSS the undersigned authority in and for said state and county, O. R. CROSS, who first oy me Deing auly SWOrn states upon his oath as follows: My name is O. R. Cross. I reside in Monticello, 1 ayia . Ty ; ; Fount Ta Lh ld} SG DL aid ia WIrence OUiLy, IVLL ml a TITY L'anl-one ol tne appli ans 1 . (Jf rma fe SR RE Gy (Cet ly Py te oy ~ CIE notion to intervene as deifendants filed herein and one of We 54 7 ll et Diam hl on ve zs tT ATR Er Fa rs vn pe § rv =F ] thie intervener—-celfendantis ‘173 (ie response to motion ior suppie- mental reli1er atracneg nereio. res ently lain eng aged In the 1h surance business h ithe f v 0. c 0 o sit 0 fo mnt 1 Aral lA NYY A : “ Slits A, CLA) Ada bt ANI X22 x rae Qtrvarirntornr ss nt of VV LL Was ouper intencdent oOo; ~ p CC nyTividr \ NAP AIILY iVil J : a pnd 1 ETS -~ fig ~ PRE IN | ~ 4 P= PDi, andl Was a teacher ang fo »tball T i 00:8 OF ~APrA1ta bh Ix Lfatrvviilia +» xr tnorougn'y LAadillililAad YW Li Lid : J ~ 7 YA Vi1SS18SS1PPL 210 Ol 4 A ~an ] 17 Th A AT aotvirt DOD LAL UVLO Lili Lait ULo LL LULL, remo SE Ply Si RES EA Ty fe ERR bal Ihe Ton VO TY i of a child enrolled in the Lawrence Count mT ATTY TY or Arye od ho a EGER SPE ga TI, Ba SEE) Pe So lit, rT 1 YL oCRo0OL t)isTT E WiOo 18 Vitalily interested 1 the 1ssuec involved 1n TE I BR I LT RII SED © ORR, Sra NE Sol SANA, SR Te i Je ORR EAS ITnatliey ang Wno will be aogvel Seely and dgdeirimenlta 1th e rellel SO! Supp.iéinenial r Y 3 ~1 | ~~ o J i tid i 1 . l L . yi i 1 3 - Aornialo ren i, oy A A Py fd ay yar CT SE eT lhe denlais and averments contained in tne attached “11 TYAS TEA we br lil CA liC ILA 2 hg ® information and belief 1RIorInation a22nG oesrierl., lief are true to the best of my knowledge, O., R\ CROSS AR Tigusine wis SWOI'n To ana suonscriped ‘ore me on this [J day of A i BA RR Te ) 3 Ly LOoXNIrnission: us P1lI es: V4 >