Letter to the office of Supreme Court Clerk Frank Lorson from Robert McDuff with suggested order of argument of related cases

Correspondence from Guinier to Stevas preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Leslie J. Winner
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 2c6b8f96-d592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Letter to the office of Supreme Court Clerk Frank Lorson from Robert McDuff with suggested order of argument of related cases, 1991. 13abd30d-f311-ef11-9f8a-6045bddc4804. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d5238c55-f1c5-4c0d-9458-20a7daa3d871/letter-to-the-office-of-supreme-court-clerk-frank-lorson-from-robert-mcduff-with-suggested-order-of-argument-of-related-cases. Accessed April 06, 2025.

Copied!

    LAWYERS' COMMITTEE 
FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW 

SUITE 400 • 1400 EYE STREET, NORTHWEST • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 • PHONE (202) 3/1-1212 

CABLE ADDRESS: LAWCIV, WASHINGTON, D.C. 
TELEX: 205662 SAP UR 
FACSIMILE: (202) 842-3211 

February 14, 1991 

Frank Lorson 
Office of the Clerk 
Supreme Court of the United States 
1 First Street, N.E. 
Washington, D.C. 20543 

RE: Clark v. Roemer, No. 90-952; Chisom V. Roemer, No. 90-

757 (consolidated with) Unit a.-17ftiate-s—v. oemer, No. 
90-1032; Houston Lawyers' Association V. Attorney 
General of Texas, No. 90-813 (consolidated with) LULAC 
v. Attorney General of Texas, No. 90-974. 

Dear Mr. Lorson: 

This is to suggest the following order for the three oral 
arguments in the above-styled cases in the likely event the 
arguments are held the same day: 

1. Clark v. Roemer, No. 90-952. 

2. Chisom v. Roemer, No. 90-757 (consolidated with) United 
States v. Roemer, No. 90-1032. 

3. Houston Lawyers' Association v. Attorney General of 
Texas, No. 90-813 (consolidated with) LULAC v. Attorney General  
of Texas, No. 90-974. 

I have been authorized by attorneys for the petitioners in 
Chisom V.. Roemer, Houston Lawyers' Association v. Attorney 
General of Texas, and LULAC v. Attorney General of Texas to 
inform you that they agree with this suggested order of argument. 



L • wIrERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVOIGHTS UNDER LAW 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Robert B. McD f 
Counsel for Appel ants in 
Clark v. Roemer, No. 90-952 

CC: Pamela S. Karlan 
Sherrilyn Ifill 
William Garrett 
Kenneth Starr 
Robert Pugh 
Renea Hicks

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Guinier to Stevas

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in