Brief of Amici Curiae Brennan Center in Support of Appellants
Public Court Documents
1998

37 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Supplemental Answers of Plaintiff Janet O. LeFlore to Defendants' Interrogatories, 1976. fd598976-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b2f19f52-0263-4124-83d3-b6a884a0e788/supplemental-answers-of-plaintiff-janet-o-leflore-to-defendants-interrogatories. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILEY L. BOLDEN, REV. R. L. HOPE, CHARLES JOHNSON, JANET O. LeFLORE, JOHN L. LeFLORE, CHARLES MAXWELL, OSSIE B. PURIFOY, RAYMOND SCOTT, SHERMAN SMITH, OLLIE LEE TAYLOR, RODNEY O. TURNER, REV. ED WILLIAMS, SYLVESTER WILLIAMS and MRS. F. C. WILSON, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION VS. NO. 75-297-H CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA; GARY A. GREENOUGH, ROBERT B. DOYLE, JR., and LAMBERT C. MIMS, individually and in their official capacities as Mobile City Commissioners, oF % % oF % % % ok ok ok % oF ¥ oF X k o k ¥ X Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWERS OF PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANTS! INTERROGATORIES Undersigned plaintiff submits his supplemental answers to defendants' interrogatories propounded to each plaintiff on or about August 25, 1975, as follows: 2. See Appendix A. 3. See Appendix A. 4, See Appendix A. 31. Plaintiffs do not claim that the City of Mobile's form of government has discriminated against any of the groups of persons referred to in interrogatories 6-30, except for the black citizens of Mobile. 32. When the City of Mobile's form of government was instituted in 1910, it was the design and intention of those persons who constructed and participated in the Mobile government to dilute the votes of black citizens and deny them equal access to the political processes. Thus, the first discriminatory action was the institution of the City's present form of government; the names of the particular per- sons having the described discriminatory intent are unknown to plaintiffs. Since the institution of the City's present form of government, the failure to alter or amend this form of government consitutes a continuing discriminatory omission. The names of all those persons who have supported this form of government, with its discriminatory effect, are unknown to the plaintiffs, and, indeed, it would be impossible to know and list the names of all such persons. A recent act evidencing the subject intentional discrimination was the opposition exhibited by Messrs. Doyle and Mims to the refer- endums that would have altered the City of Mobile's form of government. Additionally, all three of the present City Commissioners are parties to the continuing discriminatory omission, described above, of failing to alter or amend the City's form of government. 41. (c)=(y) Plaintiff has no opinion. 43. Yes. Since blacks are generally poorer than whites, the filing fee required of candidates is a greater percentage of disposable income of potential black candi- dates than of potential white candidates. 45. See Appendix A. 50. The only factor mentioned above in No. 495 which should be retained in a constitutional system is elec- tion by a majority vote. As £5 other factors, see my ori- ginal answer to this question. 51B. (a) The Commission form of government implies a multi-member panel with (Executive and Legislative) powers. If such a panel were to have individually-assigned powers which were not jointly-held under the applicable law, then any plan of Commission government would still be an at-large system and thus unconstitutional given the prevailing political (bh) No, see (a). (c) Not necessarily. (d) The Executive may be elected at-large. I know of no limitations of the Executive powers which con- cern this action. (e) The legislative body must have a suffi- cient number of members so that there is no invidious discrimination against political or racial minorities. At this point I do not know the exact minimum number. (f) In my opinion all members of the legis- lative branch should be elected from single-member dis- tricts. The principles for division would be lack of invidious discrimination against political or racial mi- norities. For the minimum number, see (e) above. (g) In my opinion, the requirement of a majority vote, isolated from other factors such as multi- member districts, is not unconstitutional per se. 53. Yes, the use of at-large elections denies blacks a meaningful voice in city government and dilutes their voting power. 53.(c) The problem with the type of election system proposed in (a) is the at-large voting factor, not the number of districts. Allowing all the residents of a political unit to decide who shall represent each district provides nothing but geographical dispersion, not locally chosen representatives. 59." {a)~1b) ‘Plaintiffs Qo not presently possess sufficient information on which to base an opinion on this matter. Plaintiffs may form an opinion when they acquire such information, in which case, defendants will be supplied with a supplemental response to this inter- rogatory. (c)-(u) Plaintiff has no opinion. Appendix Appendix Appendix - Appendix Appendix Appendix -4 / / Py / / rn 7 ; F4 7 { = A CA 7” vd { i / we PA ho § ZZ t-- SA ) wa A - re We 4 4 { / } | AA wo’ J 5 { a a4 } ”~ F dd J ALL 4 as SN NAG OBA LK J. U. BLACKSHER GREGORY BY STEIN CRAWFORD & BLACKSHER 1407 DAVIS AVENUE MOBILE, ALABAMA 36603 EDWARD STILL, ESQUIRE SUITE 601 ~ TITLE BUILDIN 2030 THIRD AVENUE, NORTH BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35203 Attorneys for Plaintiffs STATE OF ALABAMA ) ; £588 COUNTY OF MOBILE ) Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority in and for said County and State, SANS T ND. le FLooe known to me, who upon being first duly sworn by me, on oath deposes and says that he is informed and believes, and on such information and belief states, that the foregoing answers to interrogatories propounded by the defendants are true. Before me on this the OB say of RAR, eS 3 19 16 0. . (Ih NOTARY PUBLIC, MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA | ¥1 aL Puniras tise ¥y Lommission LRDITES WISI > SEAL: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Interrogatories upon all counsel of record as listed below by depositing same in United States Mail, postage prepaid, or by Charles Arendall, Esquire David Bagwell, Esquire Post Office Box 123 Mobile, Alabama 36601 S. R. Sheppard, Esquire Legal Department City of Mobile Mobile, Alabama 356601 A , C7 } <<. gent ES 1% J. U. BLACKSHER ~~ GREGORY BY STEIN CRAWFORD & BLACKSHER 1407 DAVIS AVENUE MOBILE, ALABAMA 36503 EDWARD STILL, ESQUIRE SUITE 601 - TITLE BUILDING 2030 THIRD AVENUE, NORTH BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35203 JACK GREENBERG, ESQUIRE JAMES NABRITT, ESQUIRE CHARLES WILLIAMS, ITI., ESQUIRE SUITE 2030 10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE NEW YORK, MN. Y,. 10019 APPENDIX A 2. Yes. Dr. Walker B. LeFlore 1358 Davis Avenue Mobile, Alabama 36603 Age: 47 3. Yes, Walker B. LeFlore, Jr. 4009 Old Shell Road Mobile, Alabama Age: 23 Burton R. LeFlore 1358 Davis Avenue Age: 10 4, Self: (a) Answered in original answers. (b) The house at 1358 Davis Ave. 1s owned by my husband's aunt; we pay no rent. (c) Answered in original answers. (4d) Ward No. 10; voting place at Davis Avenue; since I've been voting until last 2 elections. I have no other knowledge of this. (e) Democrat; since I've been voting. Husband: (a) He was born in Mobile. (b) My best recollection is as follows: 1504 Chatague Street Lived with parents. 1358 Davis Avenue see (b) under "self". {c) Yes. (i) My best recollection is 1949, in Mobile. (ii)=-(iii) No, not to my knowledge. (ad) same as (d) under "Self". (e) Democrat; since he's been voting. Walken Jr.: {a) 1953: 1953, (b) 1358 Davis Avenue Lived with parents University of So. Ala. lived on campus 4009 Old Shell Road rents. {c) Yes. (i) 1974, Mobile, {ii)~{ii1) No. (d) Same "d" under self. (e) Democrat; since he's been voting. urton: (a) He was born here. (b) 1358 Davis Avenue (c) No. (1)-(iii) N/A. (8) N/A, {e) N/A. 48, da): Yes. (b)-(c) My husband and I bought a certain piece of property on Stanton Road, ‘and shortly after the purchase the City of Mobile notified us that certain improvements had to be made. In September of 1974, I requested that Mr. Mims grant us a short extension of time in which to make these improvements and such extension was granted. In September of 1975, I presented Mr. Mims with a petition signed by a number of the parents from St. Catherine School, in which we reguested that the City allow the Catholic schools to continue to use Sage Park to play football. The City did so. 64. No. 65. (f) Answered in original answers. 67. Yes. 68. N/A. 69. Yes. 70. N/A. 71. No. 72. A decision to have an abortion is at least in part a decision based on finances--blacks, being generally poorer than whites, would more readily favor and seek abortions than would whites. 73. Yes. 74. N/A. 75. I have no opinion. 76. N/A. 31. Yes. 82, “N/A, 833. No. 84. A code that would allow an average white child to wear his hair in a "modern" fashion might well not permit a black to do so because of a difference in hair characteristics and tastes. 85. (a) No. (b)=(c)- Yes. 86. It is my opinion that whites of the described kind would prefer lower standards. 87. Yes. 88. N/A. 89. Yes. 90. N/A. 9l. Yes. 92. N/A. 93. Yes. 94. N/A. 95. I have no opinion. 96. N/A. 97. Yes. 08. N/A. 90. Yes. 100. N/A. 101. Yes. 102. N/A. 103. Yes. 104. N/A. 105, Yes. 130. .°8/5 111. Yes 112. N/A. i113. Yes. 112.5 v/A, 120. Answered in original answers. ils. "No. 122, No. 131. Bolden 10 or 15 years Hope 10 or 15 years John LeFlore 25 years Purifoy 10 years Smith 5 years Taylor 2 years 134. No. 135. Bo.