Decision Per Curiam Affirming Modification of Pupil Assignment Plan

Public Court Documents
February 16, 1972

Decision Per Curiam Affirming Modification of Pupil Assignment Plan preview

2 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hardbacks. Decision Per Curiam Affirming Modification of Pupil Assignment Plan, 1972. ec264d6a-3234-f111-88b4-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/28d52460-59c4-45e8-9c87-9f36660cc92d/decision-per-curiam-affirming-modification-of-pupil-assignment-plan. Accessed June 02, 2026.

    Copied!

     [||42a3b5e4-ce3f-4c28-a2b9-47f94b8b4847||] a 5 pr ; 

> a ponnT r ARNDT A! Fr 

| Ulnilo Cusii € ARE i 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

== a bg rl id 
3 

  

  

No. 71-1811 

James E. Swann, et al., ct 

enh urag Board \ AL i  P 
A ; te-M le : 

of Education, et al., \u 

  

  

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. 

James B. McMillan, District Judge. 

  

(Argued January 5, 1972 Decided February 16, 1972.) 

  

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, BRYAN, WINTER, BUTZNER, 

RUSSELL and FIELD, Circuit Judges, in banc. * 

  

William J. Waggoner (Waggoner, Hasty and Kratt, on brief) 

for Appellants, and J. LeVonne Chambers (Adam Stein, 

Chambers, Stein, Ferguson, and Lanning, and Conrad O. 

Pearson, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit, III, and 

Norman Chachkin, on brief) for Appellees. 

  

x Judge Craven was disqualified from participating 

in these proceedings. 

 



  

PER CURIAM: 

The district court required the modification 

of an amended "feeder plan" for pupil assignment proposed 

by the school board as a revision to the court order ap- 

proved in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Educa- 

tion, U.S, 11971), and, as modified, author- 

ized it to be put into effect.” We do not think that the 

district court exceeded its equity powers or abused its 

discretion in approving the plan or in requiring the 

modifications thereto. 

AFPrPIMMED, [||42a3b5e4-ce3f-4c28-a2b9-47f94b8b4847||] 

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.