Motion to Add Party Plaintiff; Amendment to Complaint

Public Court Documents
September 20, 1992

Cite this item

Motion to Add Party Plaintiff; Amendment to Complaint preview

4 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
Matter
- Sheff v. O'Neill
Case
- Sheff v. O'Neill
U.S. state
- Connecticut
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- d236656d-a446-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion to Add Party Plaintiff; Amendment to Complaint, 1992. d236656d-a446-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2990d69c-1417-4ed8-b2e4-8bd2ba59e2c0/motion-to-add-party-plaintiff-amendment-to-complaint. Accessed November 03, 2025.

Copied!

    CV 89-0360977S 

MILO SHEFF, ET AL. 

VS. 

WILLIAM A. O/NEILL, ET AL. 

SUPERIOR COURT 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/ 

NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD 

SEPTEMBER 20, 1991 

MOTION TO ADD PARTY PLAINTIFF 
  

Pursuant to P.B. §§98 et seq., the plaintiffs move that Michael 

Perez, ppa Daniel Perez, be added as a party plaintiff and that the 

complaint be amended in accordance with 

to reflect his status as a plaintiff. 

the amendment attached hereto 

PLAINTIFFS, MILO SHEFF, ET AL 

wl fA 
  

ORDER 

Wes1é: y W. Horton 
MOLLER, HORTON & FINEBERG, P.C. 

90 Gillett Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

For good cause shown the foregoing is hereby GRANTED/DENIED. 

By the Court, 

  

  
 



  

  

  

    

CERTIFICATION 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to all 
counsel of record on September 20, 1991. 

  

Wesley W. Horton 

  
 



  

CV 89-0360977S 

MILO SHEFF, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT 

VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/ 

NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD 

WILLIAM A. O/NEILL, ET AL. SEPTEMBER 20, 1991 

AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT 
  

22a. Plaintiff Michael Perez is a l4-year-old Puerto Rican 

child. He resides in the City of Hartford with his father, Daniel 

Perez, who brings this action as his next friend. He is a freshman at 

Hartford Public High School. 

23. Among the plaintiffs are five black children, seven Puerto 

Rican children, and six white children. At least four of the children 

live in families whose income falls below the official poverty line; at 

least five have limited proficiency in English; five live in 

single-parent families. 

PLAINTIFFS, MILO SHEFF, ET AL 

By Une [Au 
  

Wesley MW. Horton 
MOLLER, HORTON & FINEBERG, P.C. 

90 Gillett Street 
Hartford, CT 06105          



  

    
    

CERTIFICATION 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to all 
counsel of record on September 20, 1991. 

  

Wesley W. Horton

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Motion to Add Party Plaintiff; Amendment to Complaint

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in