Memorandum from Menefee to Halpin, Guinier, Quigley, Scheckman, Kellogg, and Derfner
Correspondence
July 10, 1985
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Memorandum from Menefee to Halpin, Guinier, Quigley, Scheckman, Kellogg, and Derfner, 1985. 06283c10-c803-ef11-a1fd-002248219001. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2b1789e5-bd15-4f2b-9ab0-993bb237e88a/memorandum-from-menefee-to-halpin-guinier-quigley-scheckman-kellogg-and-derfner. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
BLACKSHER, MENEFEE & STEIN, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
405 VAN ANTWERP BUILDING
P.O. BOX 1051
MOBILE, ALABAMA 36633
JAMES U. BLACKSHER TELEPHONE
LARRY T. MENEFEE (205) 433-2000
GREGORY B. STEIN
WANDA J. COCHRAN
MEMO
July 10, 1985
Stanley Halpin
Lani Guinier
William P. Quigley
Steven Scheckman
R. James Kellogg
Armand Derfner
I would appreciate your ideas on the central points
that should be covered in our reply brief. I plan to
do a section on (1) Post-Blum enhancement cases, and
(2) why a (i) voting case (ii) of this importance
deserves the close attention and zealous advocacy re-
flected in the number of hours claimed.