Affidavit of Alex K. Brock
Public Court Documents
October 6, 1981
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. Affidavit of Alex K. Brock, 1981. b31ad32c-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2b7bbc96-0194-4369-902b-d538dd6d304c/affidavit-of-alex-k-brock. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
I
\\
(
IN THE UNITED\ STATES DISTRTCT COURT
F'OR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTTI CAROLINA:.
RALTGH1 DlvrsroN
, ,tr.
!
CTVIL ACTION
NO. 81-80,3:CIV-5
RALPH GINGLES, et aI. )
)plaintiffs, )
v.
RUFUS EDMISTEN, et a1.
Defendants.
AIex K. Brock, being duly s\{orn, hereby deposes and
says:
1. I, Alex K. Brockr drTl Secretary-Director of the
State Board of Elections of North Carolina, the offices of
whLch are located at Suite 801, Raleigh Buildinq, 5 hTest
Hargett Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601i
2. I have served in that capacity continuously since
August 5, 1965, and was, therefore, servinq in that capacity
in 1967 when the General Assernbly of North Carolina ratified
Chapter 640, Session Laws of Lg67, which contained proposals
for two amendments to the constitution of North carolina;
3. Those two proposals were approved by vote of the
people in November of 1968 and became Article II, &4 (3)
(presently Article II, S3(3)) and Article fI, 56(3) (presently
Article II 55(3) ) of the Constitution of l.Iorth Carolina;
4. Article fI, 53(3) provides, inter a1ia, that the
General Assembly of North CaroLina is prohibited from dividing
counties in forming the state senate electoral clistricts;
Articre rr, s5(3) provides, inte_r alla, that the General Assembry
is prohibited from dividing counties l-n forming State Representative
electoral dlstricts;
5. As best f reca1I, I did not deem these amendments to
the State Constitution to be subject to the submission requirements
of 55 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, ert the time of their
adoptlon, and, therefore, r did not submit the amendments to the
Attorney General of the United States for approval or seek their
approval by the United States District Court for the District of
Col-umbia;
!'i
tti
t
\,
AFFIDAVIT
-2-
5. I have, however, now advl-sed the Attorney General
of the 1968 Constitutional amendments, by way of correspondence
on the dates of September 22, 23, 24 and 28, 1981;
7. A copy of all of my correspondrence to the Attorney
General, regarding in part the 1968 amendments Ls attached
hereto, along with pertinent attachments to the correspondence,
excludj-ng coples of session 1aws, the correspondence and attach-
ments being incorporated herein by reference:
8. I have subnLtted all information to the .Attorney General
which I deern to be of any irnportance or siqnificance to a deternnina-
tion by him as to whether the amendments satisfy the requirements
of 55 of the \zoting Rights Act of 1965 and have requested that the
determination be made as expedltiously as possible;
9. I have also submitted to the Attorney General, for his
approval, copies of Chapter 8OO, Chapter 82L, and Chapter 87,
Session Laws of 1981, these constituting, respectively, North
Carolina's apportj-onment plans for the state House and Senate,
and state Congresslonal electoral districts:
10. I have subrnitted all other information deemed by rne
to be pertinent to the apportionment plans, includinq all
supplemental information requested by the Attorney General.
CI-*H &r,"*L
AIex K. Brock
Secretary-Director
North Carolina State
Board of Elections
AFFTANT
Sworn to and subscribed before me
this &e 6 ilt day of october, 1981.
4rr***-Xfu
l,t
My CommissLon Expires