Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Edith Y. Curry Re Major v. Treen
Correspondence
November 25, 1987

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Edith Y. Curry Re Major v. Treen, 1987. 59e55833-eb92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2ba734ad-a136-404b-a6dd-29f1a32da854/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-edith-y-curry-re-major-v-treen. Accessed June 17, 2025.
Copied!
LE*AIED' NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 99 Hudson Street, New york, N.y. 10013 o (2't 2) 219-1900 i'iovember 25, 1987 i"is . Edi th Y. Curry cio iames U. tsiacksher, Esq. 465 Dauphin Street i,iobi ie, AL 366O2 Rr : lla -i or v. Treen lear Edith: Piease send me a copy of the lvlay 22, i987 statement to whicir you reier in your October i9, 1987 Letter to Pam Karian. From the face of the October 19, 7987 requisition, it cioes not appear that LDF wiii be in a position to reimburse you the $601.74 requested. As I mentioned before to Larry. wE probabiy shouid fiie a supplementai memo to the court for attorneys! fees to cover these expenses. iiowever, before making a final determination, I need to see the llay 22 statement which was sent whiie I was on maternity 1eave. Sincereiy, Lani Guinier LGi r Contibutions are deductible lm U.S. income tar purposes The NAACp Leoal Dolenso & Educational Fund, lnc. (LoR is not part ot tho National Association lor tho Advarrcoment ol Colored Peoplc (tlAACP) although li#;;;iffiil bri.ni rilciino iniies itiibmmirmenuooqrjat rights. L0F has had lorov6r25years a separate Board, program, stall, otliceand budget.