Motion of William C. Cramer to Participate in Oral Argument as an Amicus Curiae
Public Court Documents
September 15, 1970
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hardbacks. Motion of William C. Cramer to Participate in Oral Argument as an Amicus Curiae, 1970. 6f11e5a9-2e34-f111-88b4-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2d8fc0ec-7a61-4937-83ee-4ab2a0edfba3/motion-of-william-c-cramer-to-participate-in-oral-argument-as-an-amicus-curiae. Accessed June 02, 2026.
Copied!
[||7dc08060-4494-4b2c-9a8b-25fa75d73fa8||] S
O
N
KL
SS
IN'THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
OCTOBER TERM, 1970
ar e
| NO. 281
JAMES E. SWANN, ET AL, )
Petitioners, )
Vv. )
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD )
OF EDUCATION, ET AL.,
Respondents. )
) |
I MOTION OF WILLIAM C. CRAMER | i TO PARTICIPATE IN ORAL ARGUMENT
AS AN AMICUS CURIAE |
Comes now William C. Cramer and files this his motion for the
consideration of the Court:
Movant William C. Cramer has, with the consent of the parties, filed
a brief as Amicus Curiae in this proceeding. He hereby requests that | '
ii he be granted leave to participate in the oral argument of this case and
that 20 minutes be allowed in which to present his views.
Movant is sensible of the fact that counsel for petitioners and
counsel for respondents in the consolidated group of cases to be heard,
and, in all probability the Solicitor General and other interested parties,
{{ will seek to participate in oral argument and he is, therefore, reluctant
to add to the demands on the Court's time. He believes, however, that the
public policy questions presented are of such supervening importance and
that his special competence and qualifications are so unique that an oral
presentation by him will prove informative to the Court.
Movant submits that the issues raised in this case call into question
the scope, purpose and constitutional validity of Sections 401 (b) and
407 (a) of Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352,
88th Congress, 2nd Session, 78 Stat. 241, which prohibit the assignment
or transportation of students to overcome racial imbalance in public
schools. Movant does not believe that any of the parties have adequately
EE ov ee
RN ae
| *® ®
canvassed the legislative history of these provisions which were enacted
under the authority of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United
States Constitution.
Movant is a member of the U. S. Congress from the 8th Congressional
District of Florida. At the time the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was under
consideration by the Congress, he was a member of the Committee on the
Judiciary of the House of Representatives, and of its Civil Rights Sub-
committee. In that capacity, he participated extensively in the delibera-
tions and debate which led to passage of the Act and, in addition, he
was the author of Section 401 (b), one of the provisions to be considered
by this Court in this proceeding.
In view of the importance of the questions presented and the public
policy issues to be decided, Movant believes that his special competence
and qualifications merit his participation in oral argument and will
materially benefit this Court in reaching its decision.
For the foregoing reasons, Movant requests that he be granted 20
minutes for oral presentation of the legislative history of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964,
submitted,
’ RA C LJ
Rayburn House Office Building
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
RICHARD C. PEET
4442 Hawthorne Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20016
#
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
has been mailed, postage prepaid, this 15th day of September, A.D.,
1970, to:
William J. Waggoner, Esa.
Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges, Odom & Bigger
1100 Barringer Office Tower
426 No. Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
C. O. Pearson, Esq.
At rAavrmoyw and Cvmiincel 1a + YT ae
ALLULILITY aiid LVOUlISe ll 101 a fs W J
P. 0. Box 1426
Durham, North Carolina 27702
J. LeVonne Chambers, Esq.
Chambers, Stein, Ferguson & Lanning
216 West Tenth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Jack Greenberg, Esq.
Attorney at Law
10 Columbus Circle
New York, N. Y. 10019
Stephen J. Pollak, Esq.
Shea & Gardner
734-15th St., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Hon. Claude Kirk, Governor
Tallahassee, Florida
Raymond B. Witt, Jr., Esq.
Gaither, Abernathy & Wilson
1100 American National Bank Bldg.
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402
David Norman
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C.
4
{
qd __ lh. Ag a He ————————————— —
-v® . RM NT C .
iting [||7dc08060-4494-4b2c-9a8b-25fa75d73fa8||]