Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
Public Court Documents
February 10, 1998
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, 1998. 4b6b106d-ee0e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/30bd2dfe-ebc1-47cb-9460-25d1a41c6950/defendants-motion-to-strike-plaintiffs-motion-for-a-preliminary-injunction. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
FILED
FE3 1 0 1558
DAVID Ww. DANIEL CLERK
Civil Action No. 4-96-CV-104-BO(3)
MARTIN CROMARTIE., THOMAS )
CHANDLER MUSE. and GLENNES ) U.S. DISTRICT COURT
DODGE WEEKS. ) E DIST. NO. CAR.
)
Plaintiffs. )
) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
Vv. ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A
) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
JAMES B. HUNT. JR., in his official )
capacity as Governor of the State of North )
Carolina, et al.. )
)
Defendants. )
Defendants respectfully move the Court to strike plainuffs’ motion for a preliminary
injunction for failure to comply with this Courts Local Rules. In support of this motion. the
defendants show the Court:
1. The first complaint in this motion was filed on July 3, 1996. From then until October
17, 1997, all proceedings were stayed pursuant to orders entered by the Court with the consent of
the parties.
2. On October 17, 1997, plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint. In that amended
complaint, plaintiffs challenge the States congressional districting plan enacted by the General
Assembly on March 31, 1997.
3 On January 30, 1998, three and one half months after they filed their amended
complaint and two days before the close of the filing period for the 1998 congressional elections,
plaintiffs filed a short motion asking the Court to issue a preliminary injunction “prohibiting
congressional elections from taking place under the congressional redistricting plan enacted by the
General Assembly in March 1997.”
4. In direct violation of Local Rule 4.04. plaintiffs’ motion to enjoin the upcoming
elections to Congress was not accompanied by any brief. affidavit or other supporting document.
5 Defendants cannot reasonably respond to a motion for a preliminary injunction
motion which is not accompanied by a brief or affidavits explaining the basis upon which plaintiffs
seek such extraordinary relief.
Wherefore. defendants respectfully request the Court to strike plaintiffs’ motion for a
preliminary injunction.
a
This the } 0%, of February, 1998.
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Edwin M. Speas, Jr.
Senior Deputy Attorney General
ML he
Yet £ K
iare B. Smiley
Special Deputy Attorney ay
N. C. State Bar No. 7119
Nees 2 Lonill
Norma S. Harrell
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. State Bar No. 6634
N.C. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
(919) 716-6900
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing Defendants’ Motion to
Strike Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction in the above captioned case upon all parties
bv depositing these documents in the United States mail. first class mail. postage prepaid addressed
as follows:
Robinson O. Everett
Suite 300 First Union Natl. Bank Bldg.
301 W. Main Street
P.O. Box 386
Durham. NC 27702
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS
Adam Stein
Anita S. Hodgkiss
Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins,
Gresham & Sumter, P.A.
312 West Franklin Street
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516
ATTORNEYS FOR APPLICANTS FOR INTERVENTION
iare B. Smiley
Special Deputy Attorney General
This the /® day of February, 1998.