Correspondence Vol. 1 of 2 (Redacted)

    i642 Fm 

Letter to Witnesses desired by Condemned 

Certified Mail 

Return Receipt Requested 

Mr. John Charles Boger 

104 Emerywood Place 
Chapel Hill, N.C. 27518 

Dear Mr, Boger: 

The execution of _ Warren McCleskey has been scheduled 

for September 24,1991 at the Georgia 

Diagnostic and Classification Center, Jackosn, Gerogia. 

  

  

In the event the execution is carried out, Warren McCleskey 

has requested that you be present at this scheduled execution. In 

accordance with Georgia Law, this wish is conveyed to you; however, it 

should be pointed out that your attendance is in no way compelled and is 

totally voluntary. 

  

Should it be your desire to be present at this scheduled execution, you 

must sign and return the enclosed acknowledgement to the Superintendent's 

Office at Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center prior to the 

specified execution time. A self-addressed, stamped envelope for that 

purpose is enclosed. Acknowledgement by telephone to my will be 

acceptable (telephone 404-775-3161) provided the signed acknowledgement 

is presented upon arrival at my office. If you desire to attend, you 

will be contacted by telephone telling you when to present yourself to 

the Superintendent of the Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center at 

a stated time of the stated date. Please note the conditions and 

stipulations upon your attendance, contained in the acknowledgement, to 

which you will be held should you attend this execution. 

  

ail yell \ 

Enclosure 

   



  

Superintendent 

Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center 

Jackson, Georgia 30233 

Dear Sir: 

This will acknowledge receipt of notification of the request of 

W M arren McCleskey for my presence at his scheduled 
  

execution. I further understand that my attendance is voluntary and 

of my own free will. I further agree to abide by all standards and 

procedures specified by the Superintendent prior to the time of the 

scheduled execution. I understand that no photographs or recording 

equipment 1s allowed in the execution witness room and agree to submit 

to whatever searches may be deemed appropriate by the Superintendent 

of the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center. 1 fully 

understand that should by presence or my behavior constitute a 

disturbance or to the proceedings that I may be denied access to the 

execution or may be ejected from same. I further acknowledge that I 

may be denied access to the execution or may be ejected from same if, 

in the judgment of the Superintendent of the Georgia Diagnostic and 

Classification Center arise due to the conduct of actions of others. 

Furthermore, I hereby declare that I shall not hold the State 

responsible for my physical or emotional duress which may occur as 

the result of observing the execution. 

Notary Public, Spalding County, Georgia (4 Le My Commission Expires January 18, 1994 

Signature 9) 

    

  

  (469) S22-82)0 
Tel&phone Number Where You May Be Contacted 

sn Corn pPuits— = dus Erection - Le - witness  



a aR Hag  



  

Ay 

  

TY 

  
 
 

 
 

 
 

dl 

 
 

  

aM 

 
 

 
   

  

a
 

  
 
 

  
 
 

  

| 

- 

—
 

A 

oA 

Ea 

 
 

ny 

  
 
   

  
 
 
 
 

a
i
d
 

, 

b 

bd 

i 
= 

2 
5 

~
~
 

J 

 
 

  
 
 

ET 
hh 1. h COM] . 

  
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 



    

aL. { 4 / 
F RE, rd - 

f ¥ ~ 5 

o —- 

| 

\ 
TOTAL. PY =  



BE-15-1931 18:85 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO S15199621 27% 

  

McCLESFKEY CLEMENCY HEARING WITNESSES 
  

MOST HONORABLE BOB REINHARDT 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

TIFTON GEORGIA 

1 Y | . oJ " ” : | (3 

» r * 8 » 

\ - Ww ® t L - | L 3 

| = 

> v H] 

(¥ 

! 

| 

I 

+ 

" 3 3 
= % 

3 
$y ¢ | 

RA 
id 

i La! + v 

ther 

¥ ¥ & 2 

JX 5  



2-19-1991 18:85 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO 

  

11. Carla McCleskey Cro 
Daughter 

Cobb County, Georgia 

oy i. 

| hd 

Wf 4 du 

A + 14 Of ! - 

A 1 

 



P9-28-1991 15:36 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER P.B1/82 

o
n
 

    PAUL D. WELLSTONE 
MINNESOTA 

Wnited States Senate 
WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2303 

September 15, 1991 

Mx. Charles McCant 

Georgia Resource Center 
920 Ponce de IL.eon Avenue NE 

Atlanta, GA 30306 

Dear Mr. McCant: 

Please find enclosed a copy of a letter I have sent to Mr. Wayne 
Snow. I hope you find this information useful. 

I have asked Dick Senese, of my staff, to follow this matter. You 
may contact him at: ] 

2550 University Ave. W. #100N 
St. Paul, MN 55114 
(612) 645-0323 

Thank you for your interest and concern with this matter. 

Ta 

AJ \ 

Paul David Wellstone 

U.S. Senator 

    

PDW/dps 

 



p9-28-1991 15:37 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER F.a2-82     
PAUL D."WELLSTONE 

MINNESOTA 

Wnited States Senate 
WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2303 

September 15, 1991 

Mr. Wayne Snow, Jr., Esquire 
Chair, State Board of Pardons and Paroles 
Floyd Veterans Memorial Building 
Sth Floor East Tower 
2. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive S.E. 
Atlanta, GA 30334 

Dear Mr. Snow: 
= 

I wrote to you over a month ago about Mr. Warren McCleskey’s appeal 
for a hearing before the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles My 
office has not received a response from you regarding this mattex 

On September 9, 1991 the Honorable William Daniel signed a de: 
warrant for Mr. McCleskey. His execution may occur between 
September 24 and noon October 1, 1991. 1 strongly urge you 
grant Mr. McCleskey'’'s case an extensive review. 

Please update Dick Senese, of my office, with any information y: 
may have regarding this case, or is a decision has been reached 

Again, thank you for your assistance and prompt attention to t 
case. 

gincerely, 

Paul David _ Wellstone 

U.S. Senator 

PDW/dps 

TOTAL P.@2 

 



SEP=15-"591 TH) 11:05 ID:FROBERT J. CULLEN TEL NO: 484 521-1929 Hed PB2 

  

MEMORANDUM 

DATE: September 18, 1591 

TO: Bob Rainhardt, Billy Randall, Paul Cadanhead, Jack 
Boger 

FROM: Bob Stroup 

RE: Press Package 

EE -,.s )HA] PH.L€]EEH-k]°Lr© bm h  fk)b)©I= . y ———. - - —— = ———y — EE {I ———_  . ..—.. _ 

  

    

A press information package 1s being delivered to 20 

a K ht Th - my po guy } - d on . vy 4 3 a v.93 pin on ay "od 

nadia organizations this morning. we Will Bae whsthar 

anyone pays us any attention. 

The package includes the enclosed press release, along 

z % = = 8 Fn a Rp " = sad Ray pos 4 a] woo) - with a copy of the application and brief in support. Each 

; ; 1: have gon gy nts | ia Fre r-ta-N 1 Th al of — Y= . py of you should have recalved, by reqgaral EXpPress, a Copy of 

that material ; Pius The docume ITION 1n support, iI YOU 

did not receive it, let me know so we can track it down. 

Although the press release suggests 

full axpact othars of Fr wid 11 eared tran al 3 ma % 4 ia 
i | Y cp i WLiisls Ul ‘Wd WLLL LBCQLVE GAdlld ab Wold. Lil 

1 yy fo go ry i » te a 2 P= ay gu ow poy b= Ty am g - - | 

general strategy 18 to stress the 1njustice of axecuting a 

man who would not I= ores | “1-38 sanTan wy gm I~ 4 aq do hey 2 42 f= Ty hy yy § 
of 7d NUL lidve beell sallielnced TO daaltill 1X Tha Wi Y 

had been told the full truth about the key witness. 

 



  

  

  
  

   
a A SRI SY ——— 

Enka a 

Tl [AN 
Bt i "HM 
Mak 
i 4 a} 3 J) 
vod oN 5 
Nh LR oa ~J 

SEC Ti an [= : Tr 
ec LA x A F'iTI ii ——— 1 

" | GQ 1 

RY - — 

  

a a ho = 5 SP Ts 8 Sa 1 ; { 18 ‘m % 11 4 Orn £3 & R ; 

bo “ol ik 25 ANS hd ¥ F eB ig J | {3 oF a so 1] 

  

: 
i i | 41 

: ) 1 ¥ - To Sa I PR 1 ha _ " a . ud [SEBS Y nro asoga1ncer tho oath man 

JUrors tu {Oo am Dea | & 2 Je; Y Inmate's regues flave voted against tne geatn pen ’ 4 RE BR »% | vi ’ - . # ke + be . ~- ’ 

QQ a fd’ 9 vo Bod g | rn 11 % $1 [ 4 ka 1 a A i a tire PF | = # & ) lll » for clemen: alt if they had known that the 
q : Midi 1 . J J 1 . 

Va P % hy 5 99 9% - . - al TP : a 3 SHY - en ni or 

] | | \("Y) ¢ a, AVINO MeCleckeay chiedule d tn dia state's key witness, Uiile Evans Lh y AAS EE BA Ane Ip JES dive i 5 | jl=1 0 Wik d LE |] {= of BEE Ls A Ahr LSA) SAA ded W CAA dnd p : 

w # " . v= 
1s YE 1 Ye an 3 9 Mo FYE t 

? 5 : ph , | od = ae A aer at 7 on TIL. ny, - ~ ra rded Foye fi yr Faq HrriNny a 

ark Curriden ay at 7 p.m., was denied a sts varded for his tesumony. 
Staff writer wecution Ti " Bs t into McCleskey’ 

i od Ui tT ‘dl 1} | fd | | % 

    

Two of the jurors who sen- “It looks like the Parole heard the wiarietta native adm 

tenced Warren McCleskey to die Board is our last hope,” said a he was the triggerman, a states ; 
in 1978 for killing a polic ceman defense attornes Paul C(a- ment Me Cles Key denies 

say they would have vots for life denneadq. A 1E JUry was not (oia Lvans 
  

  

imprisonment instead ai had key, 46, was ed Raa rked as a jailhouse infor- 

known an informant was reward of Atlanta po er mant in other cases and had 

  

ed for eliciting a jailhouse con- Frank Schiatt during a robbery charges against him reduced. in 
fession. at a furniture store. return for his testimon: | 

The jurors’ statements came In requesting clemency, at- The two jurors are expected 

in affidavits, filed with the state torneys pointed to statements : at tl nda 
Board of Pardons and Paroles the two jurors that they felt they - The only other evidence that 
and obtained Thursday ¥Y The were tricked into voti ng for the McCleske Y was (ne gunman wa S 

Atlanta Journal-Constitution. } death penalty the testimony of co-defendant -. 

Monday hearings scheduled on Both jurors $aid they would Ben Wrigh s = 

wh fh, 

  

'd
 
H
i
 

5) 

f= = 

 



  

  

  

    
Weed 

      

~Jaty " 

| %) 

~ 1 3 

| 

¢ 

| 

= w H ¢ . 

w { 3 
|] 3 

4 if 
| & L 

2 

It 4 

r ho ot 

i wot : 

If { EF 

: i 
Ҥ 

| 

| 

iY - 
13 > i 

1 
vit k 

é Vd 

| 

4 4 Wikk 14 a 

4 ¥ ". 

at :s i | 

% uv 
no 1 [| x , As 

pid Ld ! 
3 | ri] é 3 L's i aA 1 To rraaty A % 

1 be i 5 

Since the deg { 

INStAared 83 4 

nla 
OPIS t shoo 

rently, there are 118 people on Pex 

  

Georgia's death row. Specific sf hey deserv 
tistics on how mally 

- Ve 

! 

i 

i 

a af - 

I ¥ 
x ~ 

LE 

} 
1 % 

+ 
’ . pl 

i 1 

4d -) 

] 

{ ot 

=. 101 

    

4 

ht 

wk 

1 

1 

13% 

ye ALA 

 



18°'d "E101 

  TAT" 03 =o = = £ 
bel [1 [ ; 

30H =] ] rt 
a Joos bt | 0 [on ERE JS od be md = § | EE) 2 = i | = 1 - af EH IERACIZE) fal) 11:51 661-61 60  



19-1991 12:34 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER P.B1./01 a mL |e | eg CN A A 

  

GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER 

FAN 14 ROR 

TOTAL P.@#1  



SEFP-12-'91 WED 16:13 ID:ROBERT W. CULLEN TEL NO:484 521-1924 H355 PB1 in ee er 

“| 

  

LAW OFFICES 

STROUP & COLEMAN 

4 WALTON STREET, NW : ERHANE 
TELERHON ROBERT H ATROU® 

BEd-8800 ak dx] 5 2 f= = ELIZABETH J GRLEMAN - ANTS GE . : = § v4 S825 
aC) 23000 

 



  SEP-18-'91 WED 16:14 ID:ROBERT W. CULLEN TEL NO:484 521-1929 1355 PAZ 

- 

   



@3/12/1991 17:13 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER P.81.84 
- 

State Board of Pardons and Paroles 

Wayne Snow, Jr. James T. Mots 

  

Chairman Member 

Moliey Howell 
Member 

FIFTH FLOOR, EAST TOWER ; 
FLOYD VETERANS MEMORIAL BUNLDING Michael HM. Wing 

2 MARTIN LUTHER KING, Ji. DRIVE, SE Member 
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30334 Bettye O. Hutchings 

Member   
COMMUTATION OF SENTENCE OF DEATH 

WHEREAS, a sentence of death has been imposed in the 
case of the State of Georgia vs. Freddie Davis, Case No, 1188 
before the Superior Court of Meriwether County: and, 

  

WHEREAS, through counsel, the Defendant Freddie Davis 
has sought from this Board an order commuting his sentence of 
death to a :.sentence of life imprisonment as authorized by 
Article IV, Section II, Paragraph II of the Constitution of 
the State of Georgia; and, 

WHEREAS, the principal witness for the State at each of 
the judicial proceedings against Freddie Davis was the 
codefendant William Spraggins, who now has stated in open 
court that his testimony against Freddie Davis was false, and 
whose previous testimony, therefore, may no longer be deemed 
to be of sufficient credibility to support another’s sentence 
of death; and, 

WHEREAS, the objective facts present in this particular 
case establish among the two codefendants a common degree of 
criminal culpability shared equally between themselves 
warranting equal punishment for both; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the Members of the State Board 
of Pardons and Paroles that the sentence of death imposed on 
Freddie Davis be commuted this day to a sentence of life 
imprisonment. 

For the State Board of Pardons and Parole: Y 
of December, 1988. . 

SD v 

os 
or 

Pali ar Re - 

  

/ a a 
LES 
  

WAYNE SNOW, JR. 
 Shairm an / 
id 
ail 

 



- 
P9-12-1991 17:13 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER : FP. 82-84 

  

State Board of Pardons and Paroles 

Wayne Snow, Jr James 7. Mortrs . 
Chairman Member 

  

Settye O. Hutchings 
Member 

FIFTH FLOOR, EAST TOWER 
LOYD VETERANS MEMORIAL BUILDING David C. Evans 

2 MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. DRIVE, S.E 
Mamber 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30334 

   

&. JONES 
amped 

£ BA 5 ¥ phy, py TTT | 
¥ Vl ‘ OF ™ iN 3 £ 

Ya . 

TT} 

A - 

pn 
on 

| i € ec | — hd i o 

vy . ’ i A - ’ 

3 * v 
, L wd . i 

fy Yr 
h ~ A= 8 | a es por’ | 

4 3} - 

A 3 =F 

ry 

= A J ar ot ke 4 

y . } y u 
* 1.4 4 a 

— ed AY y 
AUGUSL 

» 

: . 
ro 

y + % 
* 5 | WA :- 

8 

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 

 



   

  

A9-12-1991 17:14 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER 

DX/22/8% 12:20 FAX 404 8B1 8302 GEORGIA PAROLE 

Wayne Bnpw, Jr 
Chairman 

x, Ls =e \ Wt J 

X a 
-13 

. A . 
ed 85 

5 3 

* 4 % £m 
TT. 

- 

oi 

™ k . A . * 

A 
5 

4 1 FY - 

Ed 3 

w . 
A 

A 4 oe 

" » 

un © 

HM ¢ " 

2 TS 
ld Bb 4 do » - 

Be i 
v & ig 

A = Qa 
» | & A 

a go Mars 
y % 
ow 2 v0 

in o 
bod » 4 . 

  

FP. B3-84 . 

002/002 

 



  

   
#9121991 17:14 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER P. 84.04 

03/22/81 11:0) FAX 404 851 $502 GEORGIA PAROLE @002/007 

“£41 " 
rt 2 

¥ ' { 

veiiliame ¢ 

VE 4 XL ¥ y ¥ 

& 

Win Bi g 

TOTAL F.5d 

 



59-13-1991 14:13 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER 

    

“ . T ~ rT Sy Pe TI mm 

L VISITATIO &' OU ESL McC hn | TAT I L¥ J) N A BLAS a 
d Uh ee ee a ee ce en, Sd ht fn fof Yo . L™ 

TF gon yn ” 
Becky ope 

ATH 
Paulas Al i)alit 

x Allison Alban 
£3 

A ow je | 4) 
Hig A er A : 15k 4% 

TS gw § — go i » 
Rev ICY € wl 

aS aTe. 114 | 
yet . A = 

| yh y ~ ] : 
A J i 

M1171 
ALS A b, A YY 

¥ voy pa md § - ] 1”, "vy 
wed [ICA J LJ = 1 

Mary 21 11 [1 
N 

of 4 [| 

. ny RY rn pe ys } 11 4 é 
A - sa a 

n » > 

Marcha i i 

. . 
Bak lc i 

% 
1 AW & Ji 1 i 

y 

ww, ; 
+= 11 

Tra 5 + - 
LAE ~ J p= | , 

mS bo fe J 

 



A9-13-1991 14:14 FROM GEORGIA FESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER 

  

TR ST) A Y er Us Rr rd A i " . 
ve IL. AN 2 X I! J 'N: 

™™ nT 

F Ek LINTIA yp » 

|= IN T 
Vode AVIAN A wil i 

1 50% ¥ 4 A 
4 VF WJ A i SEAN RS 
TTT po pe " 

BE 5 \ FAIRS 1 A 

me 1 | | 4 5 IM YAN F &! 
wh I k AN 1 { LF 

r, 4 

| 2 i ] MM } 3 1 
bh 4 ¢ 4 A 7 d } ' 

4 ¥ rey % 

Ld JLINFIE A 

| - a P, 
: IW ¥ 3 

h Fo 
-— BP PY | % 

2 § | 3493 LL } = i 

3 oh f 3 \at 4 dah 7 - o 

} 3 i ~ “ATT 
ol AY LB H 

y I i 
A 4 *- AAA y ¢ 

RR 1 
. dud 8 i) 

y 2 | xX 
» Ls £ 41% 

1 t 
a“ LA & o Su a 

A ahs 4 A 

ALL | ORG] 
¥ 

aq OY “4 f 

| =) Ti X 
™~ ® iN 

A = 4 

i » | X 

i 48 Fh ¥ iN LERo LL) I' NOK}: 
{ I! ! " 24 VY 

| 4 4 A 

1B 4 -, 
3 k 3 

i | 

3 A y 

Wi . 
4 . 

A [ 

¥ - 
| 

™ X 
| | dS  § | 

. § CT 
#4 | -'y ’ 

 



11-5EF-1531 12:43 =3 

amnesty Fax: 071-956 1157 

international 
NTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT 

: 

{ Faston Street London WC1X 8b. | 

) United Kingdom 
] 

  

F AC MI Y OVER SHEET 

| w 

d ii) 

ff 4, 

T hf fe we i 

§ | dock DoeeR RE ai ; 
th ; rb] & 

. \ ] - “a 

! Con 7h VA gan P y £0 ATR ee : 
5 E 8 z al a od | 0 5 2% — ” “vy " 

ATARI CAS lf SOR Td, Av 

: in f O10 | . “ ¢ . p. - } Paver Coiu/a/a4 at AX nny OIVI-213 962 {2.33 ——— ¥ Shou fo HERR cm 

bi 1 MITT AMY f 
| FO DLE IM L 

{ 

i 

+ han. 
111 5 f | 

=
 3 

E
E
 3
 

.. 

§ 
hy 'y a 

i SE 4 : pal LAAT LAA, . ; { 3 
A (A_ "se be add LA CA os a a a 
CALA - ; 3! \ : 

A 

: \ ” fe EA wh 
pin § ) al & We > = We ry al v A 

|} ¥ 5 WA Ly - Fg bl w - 

\ rr 4 wo 3: \ Vig [hm 

if = nl SN - Fa [A a ¥ = A. 8 lh, AO 
pr or A =X {tke 

[rec a i NS - + SLX i y 

£0 4 4 ) 4 War .k ” 

C AALS LJ TIAA “wf | 4; £ P a = “u-- 
| REA BA Wn WALh ST WAALR gd = ER " g i fm § k 

| 

Ld | J > | 

| $3 , y wif leo 4 

| ol Rr SA C= A L Wa r 8 £ %oclid 44 

LI VO CAE COAL LAA C {Le ¢ 
| 

| 
. ' : “9 

ALCL AAR Fr FACS ’ 
- | 

} 
i 

i 
L. 

  

~ 

     

ts
 
En
d 

m
m
 
m
l
m
 
A
 

    

 



el 12: a = 21 EF-145 | 
i
 

-
i
 

1 8 
=F = 

4
 

(ng 

> _ ' 

7 Foy a ] + : 

> 

i 

-% 

1) 
‘1 

- 

. 
3 

or 

Te | » 

» 
4 

[ 
4] 

o
p
 

~~ 

- 

S
u
 

wi 
> 

=
 

Ji 
—
 

—
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

vl   

 



-— 

ER 

P.O 

ITAL. P 

10n 

TL 

12:44 EP-1591 1 |
 

-
—
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 



PECOURCE CENTER TO BOGER 
FROM GEORGIA 

A
 

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
 

a
 

i
E
.
.
.
 

Am
os
 

 



   National Office 

A A Suite 1600 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE 99 Hudson Street 

AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. New York, N.Y. 10013 (212) 219-1900 Fax: (212) 226-7592 

July 24, 1991 

Professor John Charles Boger 
CB 3380, Van Hecke-Wettach Hall 
School of Law 
University of North Carolina 
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 

Re: McCleskey 

Dear Jack: 

Enclosed is a document we received from an inmate on death row 
in Florida. As you can see, he has prepared a petition for 
commutation for Warren McCleskey. Obviously this is not something 
that you will want to use, but it may have something useful in it. 
I have had it on my desk for sometime to review, in order to try 
to save you effort of reviewing it, but I have simply been unable 
to get to it. Therefore, I am sending it on to you for whatever 
it is worth. 

Karima would like to know any reaction you might have to it, 
so that she can correspond with the fellow in Florida to let him 
know what has been done with his work. 

We are assuming that no news is good news from you. We hope 
not to hear from you for a long time. (Seriously, please let us 
know how things are proceeding, and let know what we should be 
doing from our end to help you.) ; 

Yours,    
Dick Burr 

DB\ lds 
Enc. 

Regional Offices 

Contributions are The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is not part Suite 301 Suite 208 
deductible for U.S. of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 1275 K Street, NW 315 West Ninth Street 
income tax purposes. (NAACP) although LDF was founded by the NAACP and shares its Washington, DC 20005 Los Angeles, CA 90015 

commitment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 30 years a separate (202) 682-1300 (213) 624-2405 
Board, program, staff, office and budget. Fax: (202) 682-1312 Fax: (213) 624-0075 

 



  

rk 

 



  

James 72: Frankenberry, Dr 

PO Box 747 osc t3/ 

Florida Stale Friron 

| Starke, FL 33209 

Governor of Georg 

he Ja le Cap/bo/ 

Attont % Seory 12) 

29 April 199 

Re: Warren Me Cleskey 

Lear Governor : 

7 idee lol Ji ke “oe Fedo the enclored 

Petition Hor Commutntaon on beh oY 

Warren Mec Cleskey 5 and could DET em 

EAs his pa 4 sll i LsS reguired. 

TH EArt PEr™MILS/0N |S Unnecersar)) 

powever, eZ aie Sppreciate your 

receiving “he pet Lion Con sidering 

the ISSwesr presen Lec! 200 2vicing 

recep of Chis mastery! Adank you, 

Sv ncery ely 

Jems. 2 Zoirirllnny., J.  



  

  

Ln re 

Warren Me Cc leskey 

  

  

Pe trton For Commitataon 

by he GCoversior. of. Georgia 

  

om es KR. Lv anh end erry, Ar 

P.O. Box 7471 Fogc43) 

Flori ola SS Yate Prison 

Starke, FL 3700) 

On behalf of: 

Warren McCleske y 

  

Dated: May 2799) 

  

   



  

Lr re Warren Mec Cleckey 
  

Petr tion Hor Commutln ren By Lhe 
  

Governor of (Georg? 
  

—Z able off Contenbs- 
  

  

  

2 pagers, 

Ze LD Ceryore tn Crorr of Lhe Offespre © 1-3 

wz Thrhtert of the four Robbers : 3-8 
  

[Gereral Plan J Spec: Ye Tnten Cr Co detenclints 

Intent Design # Premeditatsop » Other Acts 

Facdus/ Zonoccence £4 Reflexive Actron Bs 7 ime. 

Elemen sp Lonpertect Set Letence; Express 

Malice Lt Corcaumstantsn/ Evdence oe Witness 

St Cemen Ex Codletenonts’ Statement 

ar D1 26r2mm aEic Analycis of the Offonce -% 
  

  

ar Copel sion snc) Relre¥ Sought Q— [4 

YE) T2b/e of Cases Cotedl 1m Pets; Ero /5- lc 

  

  

(& ne Cntr Lex, Kee [es X Mscellsneos Reterencer /G 
  

TT 72ble of AuthoriCre Cates, Statute, 7-22 

Rules and Mscellonecwr References 

Cotbed io Me Clerkey vs Zant, No, 89-7024 

    

  

  

April 4-5 /9/ [Shp spin) 
  

 



  

Dixie Furnlore Sore robbery, yet PO one, 

wax Lillen] /N +hore robberies, Tr [3 OLE 

Lien by Chir portlotr stsclher Te Cleskey 

| perdormec! “He olher robberies 9 [one or 

ce, obhers or Lhether 273 Fact any 

/ A cm ens or: convictions ancl sefbencer 

Fhe culled From Lhe oher robberses, 

Ber Wiriphtrs ho De) IS onli] “rom 

Specific description /17? “he Cnrded 

Sates Sopreme Court shp epinion, | 

yet a the obher three relies merely 

bad Yay Lolr , wood nal Wright porsess 

Ar 5 vantage reg arcing 10 fluencing ancl 

centrelling 9/beC 1clirectdy, Lhe 2c lione 

of his co oedenddants 7 Gee Diagrammatic 

Analysis. Ct. Enmund florio/a, 458 0.1 

282 (1982) Clhe olesth penalty miy not be 
dvoked Lor A co-tel x wh Ere fe TA 

os of nol, ynbend A932 1/1 1ng La ke 

place); Lowe rr, tate 20 F719. 255, CS Sb, 

£29 (925) - Freme ditntaon > has ben Tlsted 1a 

fos ‘5 prs ntentzon Le oo Lhe 2c /7) 

Guestion’ : 2 Po/k v. State, [79 Too,/ 23L 

(Ela, 2d PCA 1965) ( Design > has been ped! 

Zo MES /,) Lhe gpecitic rte SE Lo LI) 

See Fed R.Crm P. 12(d)3) » Fed. R. Eid. 
404 (5): (25. vv Lobue, 75 = Sepp, 748,757 

df 

  

  

  

   



  

  

(M.D. Zl! 1996) ; 2.5 vv, Forbenbury, Gi =z) 

473,479 (104 Cir 1990) ( pact crammal 

con uct) : Mc Citchen v. State, 9¢ So.20 
7 : 7 

[62 (/3. 196) ( 2 premeditated sign ii 

Formed por reflection) Mickiewicz \ 

Ste, [14 So.zd G24 (Fh. 1962) (whebher an 

acl of k1/hiog /s ole fsb eratel; intencko 

ors merely redlexie) Wicoimne V. Stabe, 

W=3 Ff, 100 oo Jo, 5873 (03675 (Except for 

felony murder, Zhe Js Ce must a/leze 

Z. premed tated inben'tc to k1/) ) 7 

Boyeltd v. State, 692 Fa. E22 C2 Su, 937. 

a (1905) C the higher murder offense regres 

41 Spprecis ion of Lhe probibilty AC 

Che 2c wil Ssrec tly CAUSE Joss ot 

fife) ; Farnds_v, State, 567 Joz/ 425 
Z =] = 1990) ( defining CH lewd 90m >) 

Horpbeck v, State, 77 So. 2d 876 (Fh. 1955) 

(the detenchint was Gieling and 2betling 

ml 0) 2 robbery commited by PZ. Alero 

WN Cs ler vv, S5 Cate, 22 fg, TOI (100c (rE must 

Loe 4 Lorre [ong enough Co chow lets 

beralion rather thin sudden pacsion 
I or WER + Collinr vi State, ES S74, 

loz So, PPO (925) (2b sence of malice). 

HEN While MeCleskey. 1s nots professing 4 

| Factual L200 CENCE 3 c/aim uncler Kichlm an 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

BT 

 



  

Vi Wilson, £73 t).8, 454 (19#¢) resarding 

Lhe srmed 5 rebbery per fe, JF he 10 Sct 

wis the Crizgermar, bu may have redlexively 

acled! pot on /y From Ar impertect relff- 

preserva bron elemenl [See Jy Jrester 

State, 14& a. /C6, 35 Jo, /42 (1903) Pncler 

v, Jddte, 27 Fh. 30,8 So, 839089) 
£2 of ge tL ve dG Late, 40 [=9. 757 29 So, fl 5 

(222) ancl Delgado \n State, 36/ So. 2d 
See (Ef: 4DoA 19787] mn 43%, being 
© /) ed prulsdlec] Load Ler Wrights 

shotgun ano the police ot F cers pte 

Me Cleskey probably rescted in a reflexive 
MNANHer 9 brent EXpresi mile ure Yo 2 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

- Lees Lior chere fe 23S Ar) AR, 

danger / a he rough? “ov rervrender fe 

Che otbicer, ben Wright may have Ther 

Shot Mc Cleskey 2n0l/on Lhe oficer. 

The prsleolr possessec! Ly he o Cher 

Leo co oe tendants Dove pot Le ole y- 

crv bec! AJ nol having white— handled 

ge nor are “he cA sbert sr hose 

wed p ens ; len Litre, 2/Ehoug/ such facts 

may ba Le been ots oe ose! 2% Lruil Lue 

Zn conjunction witty that emis sie), the 

scl! pm vircler Lupo? WAT Never 

fecovered, 2 ett Che £3ta/ Leorlle ts /¥ 

~ 

 



  

4 ffeged Lo fee Om € seecrtiely, rol only 

Lom A BP pistol, ba 2 38 Porss handlgeen, 

Lert P93 5% 3457) 

Wi, &h Ben hrighT poets /hy 7A cing 

Felony 1 un oler chsrsec ancl Ofte ANE 

acing escilpe charges, Lr) re/ioh/e eel] 

LAGE coerced, oncheslriled testimony 

be = i ae Eizo vy Lonel Sater, A405 

(25, /5p (1972)  Macci9h v. Uniled Sse, 

2g LAS Fos foal 
CTI. ma) ory exerciye.s les slate SOA, 

no reper belonging Le Lhis court... TC 

5 9 X1om$ Cac that hiv Court does net 

Function 3r 9 backup legis lature for 

Lhe reconsideration of faded 9 Henpls 

Lo Amend existance cliluter, > ( rice 

Thing el /74 raha/l, re R77 2, 5 ) Jor Ly OPINION 

13 fle Cleskey i. =007, Spr) ot Sages 

{= 24, dissenting cpimon ) See New York 

Limes, April 12,129. pize [ C21 col. 35 

Newsueek, April 2.7, 122/ prize €& The Neu 

Journil, Apel 43-12% pige IA; The oriola 

Limes Cnion, Apr: 19, 199/ a J, 

Cieing a sCatisbica/ a03ly sis by : Lhe 

legal Defense 500 Educa rons! Lind, (79 

Hudson Sree, Suite /eoo New York Ey, 

NY [oosz) late el January ZL LZ 2/1. 2 

—7 - 

  

  

  

 



  

75 ec +/, Jo lh 124 RE ers. fire de en executed 

/) &e nCR 12! 

      

Dste Name Prisoner) Victim 

[2-15-83 John Elden Smith W - W 
72-84 Tven S€anley 8 
To Al pha Obi s Jtephent B —- W 

| —9-&5 Ro srevelt Green B= WW. 

2-20-85 Van. R. So/onion 8 = WW 

B-20-85 John Young 8B —W 

G 24-86 Jerome 8 edilen B — 

§-/5-87 Jo seph Meilligan B:—-£ 

5 =22-87 Richard Tucker B — Ww 

5-29-87 Wi lham Bey dl Ticker Ww ww 

q — 1-87 Bly ritchell B - Ww 
QZ $7 Timothy Me Corgueodal WwW -W 

7 -2&-85P mcs Mes rer Wo-W 

5 18-89 Henry Willie 8 —W 
[4d = (# Ww - W) (3 B VNC 5-8) 

B= 52 » Wz 67 U=3 (75¢a2/= LZ) Are 

presently, As of Che Le PER lis Cing 

by Che LOE. on Aesth roe [77 G€or3/9, 

Cr€ing the Florida Times Cn: on, 

Janu sry 5, /99%/ at page FL kT : The Sentencing 

Project report carol that 726 ot every 

/ £0 (u]#]e) On ed 35 Later es Les $ Are INCAr= 

ceraled, for Black Americin a Lhe 

| rode 3 3 /09F per /C0, O00, > 

— 8— 

 



  

YI LD; 2g ramm SLE And lysis o - Zhe C Lene 
rr m—— 
  

  

  

  
  

(Font Door, D, xe Furn [Liye I Lore) G; ear Door) 

< ee i 
<> % LL. I= — iN Wright 

Police Of 7CEr. McC, les key | Co~fehon : 

| =\ Co Lelor 

wants Witness       

    sags Tut a 
Ofte Evant 

      

  

Symbol ee representing Z 

——————— 
rr ——————— 

Ben Wirigh rs rr io) o FL, ID Corr) 

Police OfLycer — Me Cleskey 

Tv —-— Te rLimen y 3 7% inst Me (leskey 

” = Pris eners Wri ii EL a9Nd £Acing PEK “1% 

  
  

charges (Le be rsp seed] for 2 oe lnl), 
  

  

GW 7V Cont rr Bool Loe £ #05 ough 

| On beha/¥ of one man, Warren Me Cle skey, 

AN o/ o thers who are or mAY be stm tardy 

I Cus ted, Z request hat Ze eth 

senbence of Warren [Me Cleckey be 

comm lao! AN = erm Vs} ~ rte Jmpriren ment 

which 3, a7) “ung usntatiable Lerm > [See any 

| Ve ZcoImore, 893 F.2d 1269 /2/] (1990) 1. 

Kuotrng Phen New York lime, Apri £3,493) 

Lige C2 d The decision, Me Cleckey vo Zan, 

of) 

  

   



  

Accomplished mucl oF WwhsC I. Se srce. 

RehngeisC Led to Js [o5T year in A per— 

sonz/ CHAPS IGT “o pervusde Congress Go 

Dmend- the habess corpus statste £is 

legis ht ve alder?’ Falod aller proetariy 

resistance re pr SEENON fedders! juoher ore 

rom Demo erotic oz Hers 277 lt engresd, 

Lrrespectie a? The my ority cpr ion Sormu— 

fring reviced stmndlsrds pertaining 22 “he:(1) 

Qbure of the faders cerpPuUs wnt: [& lve 

lability, Cause anol prigicdien Climb Vi 

Sykes, 4133 LU. 5 Tz 97D, (3) “geod £2. Ch 

Les gfe Er TT 2nle i vi Loni of 

Sader T73 45 (9601 and Lhe Factor 
oo A Ya ate counsel, “0 PU Sue 2// Lhe 

prev ously loc. claims Lot. Larten vids Lite, 

155 NE. 2 738 (Tod. 1983) (15 ALR. 4th 585 = 
*,92)_] wilh. 3 Ly bore 4 os sc shel 

7150 | 0 EN 1 Bs oresces ble leita 2bandt. bavenl 

LS ere ex ss PZ) DEgreigs Lrend/ by YI 

Relrec gers = for] Counts Hoo: lrwrsde orm 

Court otecisrons regarding Muranch V, Arszond) 

3&4 UJ 4+3é (19¢€¢) and sezreh snc SeIZ2ire., 

To lermatoen aad endence oblamed 5 ese 

= Po! Y&— J/)) o, to ent phase Ss are exlienre 7 YY ort dor tics) 

  

  

  

  

  

  

Lo 2 =) es 5 32 = 5 a at y/n 4 a Colimse / Lott 

; °C. 4 7 » D 

Lf // Ae a =) te. Ar) corded. 2/kg ance Yo 

fl O~— 

 



  

tHe client 2nd! perform 2 ren/ist ic FE pk 

“or prepare Lor Lryal f= CY Var Jo Hoe V, 

Giller, 332 U.S, 708, 725-726 (948) 200d Strick- 

[and hingter, Me OJ, ef Geen. 

By /1mi€ing by Croce Lr] Al the sesues 

of SLAY, 1m porCance. ce 212 Yentzers/ exc leasion 

o Jurers [CF Lslson I . Kentucky, 4c. {2 I 77, 

(1920), fm sdeo vv, = = 1% log. ‘Sob, 71958); 

Series “. Hillery, 106 Ct cr (198c) dire co 

C23 ot Larry Powers, Miami Hera le), April 3, 

127 page 14, 8a_/, the Cou S/ des Aleppo 

accepted norms for a casomar Sanibel sor 

ecerisy/ Sera lion nN light ot , Ls 7 ELC ill 

Cr Justice Marsha lli Jissentl, F25e ! un Lk Clostey 

Vi Zant, Ne. &G— 2024 slip Ray 

a Sur leatong ‘he majorly eplnion, PY ca Tn 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Impers Eve Zo EX Amine. periphery! IS Tee 

relevsin tr +o othen pretriz/ 2rexd, bain) 

the Cour Aas 2 tlemp ted “to a 

the EXCeS I/IVE AZT a! 177 ove o //7 Lk PAR 

COS LT pet Con & [ See furray  . Gir #Lanc, 
  

{09 S.Ct 2765 (989) 1 end ‘eo ole pi ve 2 

Ae Leonclant automatic 2 pron tient of cocense / 

V4 : Sade 2S appellate, c o/late r2/ réeviéc , 

One cann PY #4 view TC he Nic Cleskey CASTE 

within Zhe context of genll or innocence, 

Lite on] dln o eats, Lor Els cRse /I& secely 

ff 

 



  

being giao) p bs vehicle to explo, C a nectsili- 

=z7 Z of p2 prisoners potential Lor ralet 

Vi 2) /2 begs Corpus tC. > comparable | Limi tat Fong 

2. R.Crum. P. Kr 5.850 re Lave —y ear Lo ME 5 

1hing Brett 

7 here may be VA) Cronalioation off Lhe Ge Georp(? 

black ATHY vi etrm exectilon ratio, 

fore may exe es ifrention Lor- executing 

Lhe A Ser of 7) o/c o/focer, ane! there 

nay exit reason for preventing Me Cleskey 

rem a] Aerleire 2romed robberies, 

However, tobi le. Courts Save Yolo! hal = GC 

would le 1l]eg en) Lo Bis 7 STE, or 

0 gully ples Gl wrote Ee etnies. at 
sentence of 2 ene recs AS In oy welt 

1h hor ered Lzcen yelrs orf 2 // fe 

sentence | * equnlly, oon 027 rela le hots rl) 

nc! oy “Zo execes le a prisoner (he 

Aas 45 50/ Sg leg ,brmate SEVEN ~srble (§SL es 

/7? courl 0%) A 0prex iate ly Lovele yeirs, 

On November &, 1990 ZL wrote Governor 

Z Douzlar Wilder Ye nid) requesting the 

commutator oft or Ct 9rrE Cano oils 

sentence free Nevssweek, J arch +, 9 pire sel, 

ls conn tnckerrtanc! a 2 ty rv lel 

Ss Lapel) orient /Lve/t Lord relr “he e perptys 

Gior of Mankind C20 rateons lize SE . 

— [2 - 

 



  

oF emed leaded! exec; ent of oe ple who ma y 

fFesiecs 3 potential Lo 100 prove Aa secretly, 

2 commuls oN oO a Che Sestt Sen forse Co 

[fe erent ol Le Zr? ho Lar te J dererts oY 

pol or ly the 220) Cor? cemred, 9 Lo oeild 

s/ro be bone Feral be socre ly, > 

By commu’ 1g Me Cleskey s sentence, Lhe 

Chree. of, ssenCing Sore Lice s could rece/ve. 

2: Lim fe ol 2 Lp cacenenl, roe ir 2 2h ever) 

Zt ough ‘the MG J Or Ey Pe) Lamed rex S04 / 

[2 ~ Vom itso h2 CAL CorpLr petat oN 2 Lhe 

PESTON re. vol veo LAs spare dls 1 conpuncti or? 

with Lhe 5 pplfd te councvels Hban erment 

aE Cleskeys previoucly a2 red claims, ,€ 

tala srpila rly 3 eeu 2) mitigating Locter, | 

Whenever Lflere exitlor 9° conte t.m Leole 9/ 

or State [ow = pursuant Yo Dress YZ Ale 

Le © clera/ [ee CO? rol, re pursudnt Lo 

LHntacle xX S Che State pLosresses 2) ATE 

focwer of 1m plied preempt OL), 

Similardy whenever Lhe Choibed Slater 

Swpreme Cowrl renders a contiovercrd / 

dec. sor The: State in re power 

o erive o 4A rodg / the Governor 

Being employed ZL Che JOIN SOr7 Jib rary AL 

BS Jaw clerk (prraless! 2 en Cals cerGbn 

of wes an o ess oN S/ Ly / Cre I, bereir 4 e 

=/32- 

 



  

48 

o frtense may 7 [2 re prehen ible. the PIS ener 

1 velved) UN repen Lat — Ais z / ke 12 public 

Ne Hen de 4 Pp Yow. Lr 2 case, zr ar 

reser + 8 Va / o 2 Cp mers Lor 2 oerente y 

an o/ ec pec, 2/ly I _c@fes A 2c orslrteiliond! 

M2 F121 ~ uole Suc / 20 MC feskey V fore ok where 

ZZ personally Am 4 A ected by p habenr 

corpus Lorn Zo fiom : 

J hereto re, /n conc lesion > Zam io bilge o + 

respec & Lely ps sxe st Lom the INEZ JO Ly 

Cpiniern 10 Me Cleske y, 171 cent ok 2,00 ot 

£4 ee Luv Lane II ev’ dence 2570 Ls questionable 

ACH L151 Ls en, ‘he Creel since « a 7 e [nek 

of : 2 4a Ln ey Lo Lhe = eC) 72 Lhe / nek 

  

  

of “A e murolenr “eR per), Zh ee. Cong ants J) / 

oy bess COrPus /SSues., 

Resp ect cull subms be d, 

rmes Z . Cnr nlc 22g J : 

omer 42 Frankenberry i Jr. 

PO, Box 747 FT 08c43/ 

[lorsds iiade Byron 
SL orke > FL F=z0%/ 

  

Dole; Lay 2 /929/, 
  

 



    

VV (2) T2l/o of (ares ted io Petron 
  

  

  

  

  

  

AE page ; 

I. Amadeo vv. Zant, 108 S.CE, 1771 (1988) It 
2.B3Cson vv. Kenbucky, #76 U.S. 79 (1986) x 

3. Boye® V, State, 69 F/a. c4d, G8 So. 931 (1915) 3 

1. Eilon v. Ate, 455 ME. dl 5328(T0, 1923) Te 

6. Carter v. State, 22 F/2.553 (7886) g 
  

GC. Collins Vv. State, 88 3. 578, 102 So, 880/925) Gg 

7 Delgade v. Sate 36/ Soze 726 (A>. 4Dch 1978) © 

8. Eoiotsd Vv. Flo roel, 458 0.5, 72782 (1982) 4- 

Q. Armas v. State, 6¢cT So.20/ 1257 +3/ (Eh. 1292) i 

10. Gigli v: OUn.ted JLates, A405 a /50 G92) 7 

Hone State, 77 So.20 876 (Fla 196%)  & 
iz. Kahlman Ve — State, 477 OU, 5,454 (1986) 6<¢C 

j3. Lowe v. State, Zo hh, 277 105 So, £29925) A 

4 Mackiewicz , State, 114 fox) G84(Fh. 1957) 5 

EVE — Mass19h vo Un eo! JEates, 277 OL. 2D) (/9¢4) 7 

16. Mc Cleskey v. Zant, 890 £20 342,345(1989) 1,7 
17. Mc Cutchen v. Si Late, 9c So.z20 152 (Fra. 9577) 5 

/8. Mi ranola Vv. Arizond, 384 0. §. 436 (1966) /O 

19. Murray v Gi arraane, 109 cb. 265 (1789) // 

zo. Propet v. Sate, 40 Fla. 457,24 So. 145 (898) © 

2/. Potton Ve State, 27 ~2 370, 8 So. 837 (1891) 2) 

22.Polk v. State, 179 So.2d are loin, 20ch 19667) 4 

23.S900lers vv. Cniled Sto tec; 3723 0.5. / (1963) 10 

24, Srackland v. Wishington, 446 U.S cec8 Gog) wu 

25 Sylvester vi S¥ate, 46 F/2 IGE, 35 Se. H2((503) © 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 



  

| at phge ! 

26. Un bed States v. Fortenbury, 9/7 52: 477 479 
  

  

Go tA Cir. 1996) 5 

27, On ideo States Vv Lobue., 5 / Fi Supp 748, 257 

(N¥.D.ZJI. 1990) 4-5 

28. United States Zichmore, 893 £20! /209 12// 

(1992) | 9 
  

  

  

29. Vasquez Hillery, loc ct. él7 (1985) Jl 

30. Von Moltke vv. &/Mies, 332 0. 5. 708 (4948) 1 
31, Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 0.4.72 (1972) /0 
  

3. Wiggins V. State, 23 Fla.180,/ $0.6973 (18287) o 4 
[~Z 474 
  

  

(hb S Entbutec, Lule sr R Miscellaneous References 

Fed R.Crim. P. RR I= (=) <4 

Edie a Rot + 
New Vor k Timex, Apri! 17,199 (pr, C2 col z) 7,9 

Newsweek ¥ Aor! 29, 199 (PPse = 8) 7 

The News Journal, Aprsl /7, /99( (pas € 25) = 

The Fbredn Times Onion, April 192 12 (pg 84) 7 

Leg2/ Detense & Educational Fzend (= bats slrce 

AL oY SA rudry 21,1991) 7-8 

Phe Florio 7imes Chon, Souiry S 199 pg AT) 8 

Miami Herald, Apri / 3, 199/ (Fri A 8A ) /l 

F712, Lo, Crim. if RR 3,850 / 2 

—/ 6 —-  



  

ml £12 Tatle or Authoritores : Cases, Statetes, 

Rules ard Ms cellsnesus Ruteripay Cited) 

in "Me Cleskey Ve Zant, No, 89-7024, pri] /e,197] 

[p24 e Sater z </, ip opiniont Ema )or: orcs] 

  

  

/. Ad Vo. Zant, 486 UJ, 4, 22.2 (952) 26 2933 
  

2. Anderson v., 7, berty Lobby, The. Of 243 ar(nedre 18 
  

3. Antone Vv. Dugger, {cs UJ, 200,205 Sle 2c, 6 

t Bell v. Woeltish 44) US 520, 52/ (1979) 12 

5. Bowsher v. Wap S Co, 460 UJ. J, 524, AN 

é. Brady v., Mary Jano] 373 OU.L. 83 (193) 234 30,32 

7. Brown v. Allen, 344 OU, §. 443 2 498-499, 501-502, 512,537 v 953) 

  

  

  

  

  

lo, 23,27 28,73 

8, Buller . Mekellar, 494 U.S. — (1990) 77 

9. [avis _v. Dugger, FR Fel 1573, 1618 (CA // 987) 2 

10, Delo v. Tle 495 US, — A /5,/9,2),26, & 

//. Demosthenes y. Neushater, 493 45 Reali 

12.Desist v. United Shites 394 0U..5. 244, 262-263(19¢9) 14 

13 Engle v. Lsade, 456 O.S, /07 12630 (1982) 2233,3,/3, 14 

14. Ex Parte Cuddy, 40 F.62, 65-cc (1889) Il, 72,26 

15. Ex Parte Heller, 146 Wis. 577, 524 /3] NW. 29) 994 

C190) // : 

/G. Ex Parte Kane , I+ F. Cav, 79,80 (SDNY 1853) 0 

17. Ex Parte Lange, 1& Wall, 163 176 (1524) 9 

18, Ex_Parte ead [28 £ 39, eon) (Wi 1906) /2 

19. Ex Parte ld loo US. 371  396-372(/2%0) 7 

20, Ex Parte Watkin, 3 Pet 193, 20j~203 (1830) 7 

20. Ex Parte Wek, 18 How Som) 7 

fF 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

   



  

22. FTC v. Ruberoid Co., 343 0.5. 470,478-479(1952) i 
23, [Ay V. Nea, 372 U.5, 391, 4/)-4/2, 438-440 (1963) 

/6, 20, 22, Z.8 /c /0 

  

  

24. Frank v. Mangum, 237 U.<, 309 lL 9/5) 9 

25 Gigho Vv. ti States, 405 0. 5. 150(1972) 3, 4 

HIRE, Sranfinsnciers S.A. V Voiillars. 122 LU; J, 33 ride 18 

274 Hall Vi Lockhart, FGc3 Fie! co09, GJ/o (chs te) 2 C3 

28. Heckler v. Campbell, 461 0, 5. 458, #c8(/983) 18 

29. Ln re Kope/ /48 F. 505, 506 Gony 906) 10 

30, Jones Vv. Estelle, 222 ~A20 159,162 (cas /98 3) 20 

31, Kneteh v. United States, 364 U.S, 3¢1 370(/960) 18 

32, Kuhlman v. Wilson, 477 U.S. 436,444, 153-454()966))9 22 26 

332, Mandel! Vv. Bradley, 432 0.5 /73, ZS Los5) /& 

34, Massiah v. United. Srtes, 377 U.J. RD/, R206 (1964) 

/, 3-8 28 29, 3/31, /7-=23 

35. Mc ny v. ae 253 £2 £77, 884-885 (cau 1985) + 

2c, Mc Cleskey v Kemp, No. C87-165774 (ve &a 1987) 6 

37. Mc Cleskey \ Kemp, 48/1 0. J. 259(/987) + 

38.Mc Cleskey Vv. Kemp, 182 LS 720 (1987 pet reb. eh < 

39. Mc Cleskey v. State , 245 Ga, [08 112-14, 263 CE, 20] /4¢, 

149/51 (1280) 2, 3, 30 35 

40. Me Cleskey v. Georgian 449 U.S, 591 (1980) 3 

41. Me Cleskey ve Zant 254 CaS [093 (1981) va 

42, Me Cleskey Vv. Zen't, 580 fF Jupp. 338, 380- sea(1980)4 =1 

43. Mc Cleckey v., Zant, §90 20 542, 3146-35 5 (Chu 1949) 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

3 8, Ro 

44. Mc Mahon uv. Mead, 30 5.0. 575,579,137 Mh./2Z /23 (19/2) 7; 

if 
  

 



  

493, M, [ler Ve. Bordenkircher, 764 £20 245 250-252(CA+ 9&5) =D 

4, Moore Vr Dempsey 26) £2, E& (792 2) Q 

  

  

A-7. Merray Vv, Carrier, 477 UJ 273; 485-488 4972 494, 
  

496 497 (1980) 22, 25.27 28 83.84 5 4) rd 

48. Vispian Vv. Georgia Thine Co, R57 62, 1/96, 

25 2.2) cn (1987) 20 

49. Negschater Whitley, 860 F.2d 1470, 1474, 1479 

(cag 1988) & 

50, North Haven Bd, of Ed. vi Bell, #5¢ U.S. 672 534-635 

(1982 Jl 

51. Passman v. Bhck burn, 797 a /335 / 34) Cho 196¢) 

Carts arial 185 17. 9a8 (08TY 8 

=. Pennsylvania v, Finley, 18) Uf, 557, 555 (1987) 26 

  

  

  

  

  

53, Perry v. Me Lendon, 2 Ga. 598, co3-co5 (1879) 11 
  

54 Frvce v. Johnston, 334 0. 266, 287,289 291-293 

(1948 £937 Je, 27.3 5 JF 

55. Reed Ross, 4c8 0. f. , 7,10, 13, 14 Ue 82-23, 13 

$56. Rose vv. Lancly, 455 U.S. 509, 520- 5211982) 19.20, 8, {TZ 

37. Rore ptechel! 44.2 U.S, 545) 563 (1979) a 

$58. Sate v. PArks, 494 ARR 17 

67. Salnger Vv Lose 269 US 224, 230-232 (19.24) 

12-4 ,26, 2 . 

co, So mcler v. Uprted Toler 373 UNS. 1,8 10-19,2/-24 

(1963) & £ 15,16,/9-2), 26, 1 SiS IT IE 1D /9 

e/, Theale Culilln 4/2 V5. 218, 260 (1973) 23 

C2. Smith ir. Murray, 499. 05. C2 7, Sirsa) 

63. Sm. th iv Yeager, 293 O.C./z2z, 125()968) /8 

rf Y= 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

   



  

c4. SGope v. Poel] 428 0, I. 465 492,493,495(/97¢) /0,27 

B= Straight v. Waipuright 476 U.S. //32 1/33 (198°C) 206 

GG. [edgue v. Lape, 489 (5.228 avnsialieetian 26, 14,17 

&7 oe v. Sip, 372 U.5.293,3)7 (19¢3) /e,20,/0 

68. Unidoecl Parcel Service, Inc. vu frtchel 45J J 

56, Go [19e1) 18 

69. sid States ex rel, Eller ve Brierly, 

460 F.2d 414, 14e (chs) cert: olerec, 409 0.8, 04% 

(1972) 8 

v6, United Statler v. dy. 45¢c 0.5. /52, ke(1782)25 

. Upiteo States vv. Hosting, 4e) LU. L499 crn 1950) 20 /& 

92. Erm States v. Talk, 597 F.2] 249, 250-251 
(crio 1979) & 

73, Wainwright v. Syher 433 (1,5. 72,79 8-83, 87-9 
ba. 9.10, 18,23,. 24 / 72 ZE 2.9/3 2 17 2 

74. Wa ley Vo. Linde, 3c U.S lof, Jo4-105(1942) /0 

267 Willams v. J ockhart Bis mad ior - /57(ch8 1988) 8 

76, With .. Tm 470 US. 1039, 1643(985) 8 
77, Weng Doo Ye / States 265 US 239, 240-24] 

(1924) {2 16,26, 24, 17 

28. Wee cared Vv, Hetehing, +64 U.S. 377, 378-380 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(1984) 19,26, 27,5 

 



  

Sts tutes Rules apo iHraellandent Cilorsnios 

il, 28 (S.C ad (rate, 194 el) 4.75, /71-/9 

2.28 v.sc Yas (8)(c) Rule (4) 18,19 

2, Advicory Committees Notes A Rule 7, 

  

—<& CISC. Sozo4, LL d=c—427 19 

1, Ruler “Governmy H9besc CG Corpeer Proceedings 

re Rule (iS Cre) 18,19, 7-/0 

& 28 vc Sazes Lr94s 158% al.) 45 

ge. Hovre Commitles on the eo), ciary Joanat 

HR. 5269 10/7 Cong, 2d Sess, (1990) 
Lin AR. Rep. Mo, 101-681, pti i, p.29 es 

7. He R.Rep, No. 94-1471, pp. 5 G90) & £4 
8. H.R.Rep. No. 1892, bods Cong. 2ol Ee sa(19¢¢) 17 

LS Rep No. /797, 894 Cong, 2d Serr, 2()96¢)17,2, 7,16 

10. Advisory Eonrniliees Note to dr EY 

Rule 9,28 O5c ndzr [re S Rep Mo /477 
at a). mires 

lL: Act ot Feb. gfe eh, 28, I 14 JC 285 9 

42.5], Bailey, pa of bide re a0 Soecial 

Remedies oe (1913) 

13. Bator, Final Ey / on Laer Ind Foderd/ 

/H2beas Corpirs Lor S¥énte Iris enent 76 Harv. 

L, Bev, 441 463-499 (1963) 9 asd 453 Vk 

“. \/, Ehud, Wri of Habeas Corp Y30c, 

pS 70 (3 cd 1893) 1 snd Eoz J 

15 Ws Dyker, A Const: i AY History oF Habeas 

Corpur S-¢ (1920) // 

 



  

jc, &odolare, AF Note or Ha hear Corpuy, eZ Coy 

Rev, 22 32 (1949) /0, /] 20! 35 71 

[72:83 Bons L. Rev. 1o22 JI 53-1154 (770) 45 /15 

12.4, Yackle, Pitts writers Remedicr L151 

p. 551 (1981) io anol 5/33 pe So: & 210/ 

S54 8 | 

197. Tutpe Sale Cen. forte, Lire s of adernl / 

(ght, 99 Harv, L. Rev, 1/28 // 50/158 (9 8¢) 14 Fis 

Zo. /TA C ty be A. Muller XE. Cooper, Feders! 
Practice ait Procedure § 12¢7 , pp. 427-178 

(2d ed. 1968) > 

-22-  



  

Z ZL nterprets Yor of Lhe Offense 

iy 2) Ling Me Cleskey ve ZanC 890 F.2d 342 lk 

(ith Cir. 1989) ot 344 : Me Cleskey was 2 rrestel/ 
and charged Lith “he mes rder of 2 police otticer 

Jearing 2n armed robbery ofr the Dike Foornibure 

Shere, The store cas rodlzdl by fovir men, Three 

entered thorough “he back oor anol | one through 

Che Lori lo, Each of Lhe Loe mes eds drmed, 

le Cleskey pac! a ,38 cal, ler Koss white -bard led, 

nickel- plated pritn! Len Wright bad 2 caued-o Hf 

shotgun, Am0/ “the olher ‘evo had bhce steel 

pistals, The man who entered through ‘he, 

Lert J eccresd “the store, toreing the En 

ployees fo Je or Lhe oor, The athery 

rounded Lp the employeer In Lhe rear and 

began Lo Ye Tow <p Ll Lape The an 

WAS Lorceo! Fi seen port Lo Lure Ee Lhe 

store rece pt, bis wnteh, 200) J/AX So Are. ; 

Re spornching “5 2 silent 2/3rm, 5 police oA cer 

entered he Lore by the Arent door: 

He oroaceeded/ 5 pproximately Atleen £ A eo 

coon Lhe center airle. Tice shobe were 

+l Z rect One S.CT ore: il Lhe police oA Lycer 

in the head causing his denth. The sther 
ll het 4 lanced of 9 pocket Vighler yr he 

officers pocket andl lodged! / A roth. 

That belt LAT recovered . The rod ber L 

-)- 

  

  

 



  

Fed. Semetune later Mec Cleskey wa arrestes 

27 connection cot onsther Arnot robbery, 

Me Cleskey WAT olen tile] by “wo oF Lhe 

sore pervonnel 25 the robber Lhe came 

/N the rent doer Shortly aSLes bis drrect 

Mc Cleskey condosres! tLe pardiciprtin 1 Lhe 

robbery, bt A trned Zhao be (WAS pot 

the “ry Fer up Ti One oF hic dccomplicer, 

= Ben Wiig HE, te stitiec hat Me Cleskey 

Som ted Lo shooting Lhe o/cer. Oe. 

Evans, 2 Ja! Jomate bociser! ner Melleskey 

esti fed! that Me Cleskey moe 2) iy 

Aoure Se hich be /Pl od 

he Wt NB Lhe rig german, The police otcer 

WAS ks flee] by 2 bullet Lorvec! rom 2 3% 

coli ber Kors) hirplpeens, Though the wen por) 

AS or ey a recovered, Me Cleskey hac ~talen 

4 ,3& zohien Rossi 1 9 Jololup of 2 feo 

Ds sore bro VeaioYs) the edrdier. 

Foes Brig Mc Cleskey v, Zan, No, 89-7024 slp 

LL epinion 5 ref 26. /27/ aC J dei Luralyt by 

7% ts tel bree a re a// fw, 

reodbed 2 Georg iJ Lorri bure store /0 1278, 

One of the eller: shot 210 Elle d ys) 

oft cluty poli Em AN thro entered Lhe. store 

i the midst of the crime. Mc Cleskey 

confessed! “oe he police Lhat he pardacypalecl 

_— Sa 

  

 



  

/7) Lhe robbery... Although A000 oe Alri) 

Ete shooting y Further Asrect 200] | CTL 

sEanlir! ews clepce Suppo rded Me cles key. PE 

= ger! LE of tbe murder, Av eyeniCress Lest - 

weer Feo! Lh Someone [AN from the Lore 

CALL Ig 4 pear/-handled pistol Soon ates 

the robbery. Othrer silnerses Larned! 

LAE MMe Cleskey earls er fad sEolen Y 158 

pesrd—rhandled porto! oF Lhe SA 7E caliber 

FS he bolle “Hal Lil] el Lhe oles 

Een hgh, one of fie Clesheys 5 ccomplices 

con firmed that olerrvy , Lhe crime Pe Chobey 

carried 7 PO AN ad frfaclous> antl 

“he eoliler oF he Soda! bullet, Wright 

= hoobing the ofticer. Finally x Zhe prosecutor 

Jntrodiced) Me Cleske yr condession of PAPE 

cs pation ZL “he robbery. 

IL. Totbent of the Four Robbers: 

_ Geners [Phan « Spec; gc Toten Co Co oetendants 

sl teal hd Design ; hE re mecl-43 von Other Hebe ls 

Fackusl Ton ocerce ; Reflexive Aretion Line 

| Elemen Lx Lm Po erect BY elf Deten fe Express 

| MME ice Grewmetantas/ Luidence WW, bness 

1 £3 Lnteeiir + Co de-tenclants SEotlemeitas 

Mc Cleskey was 2 parently Ve) obec 10 4 

holdop be tore rd] subsequent ‘to the 
284 

  

  

  

  

  

  

   



   

  

Mc Cleckey v 2a0t 890 2d 342-353) 1 Cr 19649 
  

  

  

-Alpha - L 

Year 19- Case TT tle Us sce | leds) Fad Flog | SE=d 

17} Cir 8! Borner v City oF Pvichird | 66l 1206 

<«~ cd 
nCyr 85 Booker v Wainwright 474-975\/06-339 | 88-324 [164-137] 

1 Cir 87 Brown v Dugser 83/547 

G7 Chapman v California 386-/8 |87-824|/7-705 ; 
é& C 

1 Cir 87/ 88 Darden v Dugger UE5-743 ||0B-/j2a5 | 79-285 1825 287 x Ele 

gc Davis v JState of 344-730 

nr 87 Jes Orvis v Kemp 485 “G29 108-1099] 99-2621829-/522 

n Cir 89 Demps Vv Dagger 'g 74-1365] 

3 [2 y v Nora 292-39) | 83-822] 9-837 

72 Gig ho v JS. Wos-150 92-76 3\31-/04 

1 Cir 89 Gunn v MNMewsome £8/-949 Ga 
243-657 

79 Gunter v Yate 256-34/ 

5CGr &o [ly ley v Erte 6324273 

Fo Kuhlmann ; Vv Wi /5on 477-436 |)06-2%1| 9-364 od 

1) Cir € 7) & Lightbourne v Dugger 109-329 | 102-34€|829-Jp) 2 

c4 Macsnab v U.S. 377-201 | £4-1/99 |) 2-246 
« cdl(ep banc) 

1 Cir Poe Messer v Kemp YU 58-1029 |108-/1586 | 99-902 183 )-94€ J kes-ro8 
&c - 

go Mc Cleskey v State 44949 | 101-253 c6-19 ““ lae3-146 
/ nT 5- 53/1}, & Zan 454 4023/0 2-657) 70-63. (wo 62) Ab 23) 

4 Zant 580-338 | 5¥0-338 
(en bang 

wir 2s Kemp 753-67] | 
Woca) No, CET 

£7 Kemp 5/7 
pet reh 

#7 Kemp 481-279 Jo 7-1 G5 262 Ga 

7? Kemp 492-920! )07-3/99| 9&- ede wl 

5Cr 8 #1 Potbasv 22, 454 Plo 2-359 70-187 638-727 

48 Price v Johnston 224-206 |cP-1o#7| T2135 

e3 Sondlery v OU. 373 -| 348 /o0-/45 

£8 Satlervh te v Texad Woe 249 lo 8172loo-28¢ 

Cir Ce7-33 

    

  &F2 Stem Vv’ Rey olds Securit          



    (TT) 

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  
    
  

  

  

          

Alpha 
fo LS v Henry MM 7-264 | 100218365115 

El O05 v Morrison 449-3C1|101-665 | 66-564 ol 

W Cr 85 Witt Wh wright 470-108 l0544/5 |€4 -Fo (| 755-/3% 

#4 Woodarel v Hutchins  |464-377|l04-752| 78 -54/ 

22 User’ azas (3) 

Rele g(, 4) 

/] A beas Corpuy 

4905), £97 292(1)(3); 

F729 

Crimi Law 

os 394./(2) 
chrono 

Ctr 83 Guon y Mewrome rae 

1 Cir Pi Duzger 744385 

1 Cir &7/6¢ Lightlbourne v Dugger - — Vo09-329 yo2-34¢ A 

Satlershite v Texar PC-247 Yo¥ -/H2Yoo0-284 
< cd (4 banc) 

1 Cir Fp Messer v Kemp F5-1029 yo&-1586 199-902 IF 3(-94€ 

n Cir &7/e8 D2 poles v Degg ep 5-943 Yo& 4/25 99-285 sien 

nlir 83/62 Odvis v Kemp 25-929 Yo8-1097 199-262 829-1522 

£7 MeCleskey v Kemp 1-277 {07-1756 | 95-262 pebires 

Y&2-920 107-3/97 |96-cf& 

1 Cir Brown v Dugger 3/1547 DER 

Me Cleske, v Kemp oc d7- 

86 Kuhlmann vv Wilron 771-476 106-266 |7/- 364 [529% 

Davis v State a 44-730 

WCr &5 Looker v bo ini ht 474-75 06-337 P& 324 or 

HW Cir Witt \v Wainwright 470-1039 Jo5-i415 §4-FC/ J55 7 

1 Cr Me (leskey Vv Kemp D5 3-87 

4 Woodhird v Hutchins  Yo4-317 lot- 752 [7P-54/ 

  
   



   
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Zr hronn) FJ 

$4 Mc Cleskey v Zanl 580-33 

Cir &2 Stes ov Rey iobls Securtes 67-33 

®t! Melleskey, v Zar ASA LT02-659| 7063 | 

Cre Potts v Zane 454-E72l02-357| 70-487 |&38-727 

OS v Morrison MH 7-3€) | 10-665 66-5 64 

0 Cir Bonner v City ot frbchan &E 1/205 

po McC leskey v JEate 449-891 | lo1-253| 66-119 

OF » Henry 47264000283 65115 

5Cir 2 fe y Vv Ete lle 63 24293 wr on ? 

Me Cleske, v Stale Re3-14€ 

29 Gunler uv Site wird 
22 Gugle v UT o5-/50|92-963| 2/-/04 
67 Chromin v_ Cillorna (386/12 |€74241/7-705 

64 Mask _v UT 279-201 | 84-199] 12-246 
C3 Janclery » UT 373+] |F3tedl/o-/148 

Lay v Noa 322-3 P32 P22 F837 

4¥ Price y Johnston 334-268|6&-/o49| 9 2/358 
  

  
           



    

- Cave Analy ox - 

J, R. Frankenberr y 

Legal A, cle 4 — 20-F/ 

Mc cleskey oo Zoot £90 F2d 24z 

11h Cir Nov 23 I?7€9 Hs amended Lec /3 1997 

Reh 2 Reh /o Since Densed F=b, & 1990 

  

/ C00) vietions 477 ol senlence 5 “or men le and two 

counts of armed robbery 24 aol ey Se CL ‘ 

245 2 Le 2c3 SE 2d /11E (1980) 
  

2 Me Cleskey pe Srroped Lor wrt oF Saber COrpluv 

OS DCE NO 63 Nos. &7rcl-y5/7 ,1i87<h~/5/7 

and Vir ge J OO. Lorre ster granted petition 

  

S80 £ Jupp, 238 (1984) 
© 4 JLote Appt 2/ec/ anol ‘Ae // 4 Ci nr re werieol 

tie DIS Dct F332 £2) $77 (11 Cir 1985 a1 bine) 
    4 Mc Cleskey appealed the LSet 2441rmed Che 

1th Cir OF CE App reversal) 481 OF 27, 
/ \ 

joy JOE [956 95 LES 2d 262 (/987) 
    

§ McCleskey fled fir second petition for ard 
of Aobed r corpud Zacl the DOS Ht ND GA 

222.0 zraatec! pets Cop (928) 
    

  7 
6 State 9ppedfed 2n0/ 45917 Zhe 1th Core revertas 

Che LJ Dect £90 F20/ 342 (/5¢9) 
  

  
uy Mec Cleskey 2ppedfecl, 2 gan the OF SCE o/  1vmed 

Le /]2h Cir US CE App reversn/ ) on Apr /6, 229/ 

—l)3 jy ee Sct — i LES 2c — ourring <p op.) 

J See NENT PA LEN article gronexed 417-9 The 

News Jornal LS 27 =7 
  

 



  

James R. Frank enh 2 pm 

P.O, Box 249 Foc43/ 

Florida State Parron 

Starke, FL 3209 
Mis. Karim Weck 

LDF 
= <<] Apri/ /99/ 

Desr Mr hicks! 

i re beer elo 11g case 278) rer AN J Jr. 

| completed (Cex ing 2// Lhe crosr-rete enced 

cases in Ik cHeskey Vy Zan £90 ac TAZ (1929) 

Colo Ee reno 2 copy oF Lhe SS ct 

ar”, Ving 177 LAH < CH JE Lhccors / Sam 2 pews 

Arbicle Jn he Ford Times Lorior (4-1 9 7/ 

Pg 8) 585) while Lhe habens COL PUT Limi talons 

| wil/ be. basically ohrachnnthg eos Lo Chore 

on oath fro, Lhe ruling rer Je YA rol 

8.) oc For Arzy cub rants 9 / Rcrere€  /M 

executions. That ep (7/9) iT of course erty 

Sp ecelA Che on Jependent Upor Lhe Goer ord 

of  snchiidudl SEstee. 

vars you coulo! edp lex 2n0/ reduce Lhe 

Lypere t re the ove care, L CAn Aave 
JE Ccoplred 2,0! magnified, re SE 5 ler 

Lark copy you send, Zp i LI 
| a fo 

could reduce Lhe inl of paced Ind 

posER re. — 7 Jee lhl oLhens cotl 7 

request 9 cop iy : 

ly trend (Jerry Varley) war indicted Vad, V Arien C { Jerry Yan ey / AS noice 

or) Apr! /0, /99/ “fon Frye deoree preerdei, 

 



  

zZ hoo suggested “hat fe challense “he 

exclu JI. © ~ wn 9 Horney / ‘he grand JUrY 

(re Lost ness 95 57sL3 xa SO C77 crcl ont ly S77 

COUPE =; Ze yd oriel3 Legir/stere WZ = LAL seo | 

2 Bi) ELBE, Like 18 olher SEstes— tese/d row 

ater (e AHewe Other, 200 pot pdlrnidline 

for 3 [oy er Lo be present tt 2 

deLendint Golfer su ners pe res /N Lhe 

grand Jury reom. (0.5. randy 1800) | 

Yowever, he stall bos 5 grandpelt jeumor 

  

£72 Lents Or 2/ ; enrol erage exc/is r/60 NTL (rel evar t 

to Laleon vi Fen boscky) 723 2 Peconls LSE 

Va” ling, A mA = imply | : 

Concernin 7 See 28 XH mit 12 As gy factor 

o o you Lnocw of Any cares whepe Lhe Age 

evaluation  8/io  pvdes py Iv; sre Sppedrince. 

relabie Zo “he effense — J £h3E Yarley /o ok 

Ve. uch Vong er hon 24 20! LAST app enrdnce 

[rS we Aor bh bering EN Che sel¥ pos fence 

q round, 

Sincerely 

Jamel Re Sankey ff 

 



Hots fit 
Marianne Engelman Lado 

August 6, 1991 

Dear Jack: 

Hope all is well in the Southern 
states. 

I also hope that you received my 
note regarding the African American 
Health Care Advocacy Conference and 
that you are considering the offer. 

I will be out of the office -- and 
in a canoe -- between August 8 and August 
18. Thus, you can have more time to 
think it over. . I will give you a call 
when I get back, on the 19th. 

I look forward to speaking with you. 

Cheers, 

P.S. Everyone and his/her neighbor 
says hello, particularly all of those 
folks from Hartford. ® Elizabeth Sheff 
is. running for city council. 

 



t
e
r
r
e
s
 
e
a
s
e
 

A 

 
 

 



 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

  
 



  1 

 



   



  

T
R
 

oy “
 

<1 ks : 

F 
dl 

“A 
b+ 

] 
IQ 
~
 XK 

Ld 
0% "a 

yl 

XI 
A 

1 
1 

> 

ai 

 



J 

be 

 



  TOTAL P.O 

 



  

Ba-29-1991 14:84 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER 



@8-/29-1991 14:@4 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER F.@2 
| r— Sa 

  



  

BE-29-1991 14:85 FROM GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER TO BOGER P.83 

~~ ~~ (3) 

8 

TOTAL P.A3 

R
M
 

 



  

FROM GEORGIA FESOURCE “ENTER TO BOGER 

TOTAL F.B1 

 



   



   



   



   



R
E
 

  AUG-28-'91 WED 18:41 ID:ROBERT W. CULLEN TEL NO:4B4 521-1929 g2E PE1 £ 

  

LAW OFFICES 

STROUP & COLEMAN 

ROBERT H. STROLLS 41 WALTON STREET. Nw TELERMONE 

ELIZABETH J. COLEMAN ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Goalie nih 
404 | 522-3000 

TELEFAX COVER SHEET 

DATE: 8/28/91 
——————————. c—_ y 

    

TO: Jack Boger, Esq, 
———— 

Chapel Hill, North Carolina 
  

FAX NO. : (919) 962-1277 
  

FROM i me el ol si B Qk — or ro JJ 3 Esq. 

FAX NO.: (404) 658-1567 

NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: 
— TL   

9 

IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CONTACT: 

  

 



  AUG-28-'91 WED 1@:41 ID:ROBERT W. CULLEN TEL NO:484 521-1925 ga PE2 

   



   

  

    

   

   
     

   

    
    

          

      

        

        
      

    
    

 

  

#270 POS, 
  AUG-28-'91 WED 1@:42 ID:ROBERT W. CULLEN TEL ND:484 521-1923 

   
          

        
      
    

    

      
    
    
    

        

 

 



  

  

AUG-28-'91 WED 18:43 ID:ROBERT W. CULLEN TEL ND:484 521-1323 278 Pad 

 



  hg ATR EDR a SE A ERR at    



  

ws 
    

    

  

  

   





  

AUG-27-'91 TUE 14:11 I1D:ROBERT W. CULLEN TEL NO:484 521-1929 gzel FAal 

LAW QFFICES 

STROUP & COLEMAN 
t41 WALTON STREET, NW 

  

  

ROBERT HM, 3TRQUP TELEPHONE 

ELIZABETH J. COLEMAN ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 =On | SXX-AD0O0 

40d 822-3000 

TELEFAX COVER SHEET 

DATE: 8/21/91 

TO: Jack Booger, Egg, 

Chapel Hill, North Carolina 

  

FAX NO.: (919) 962-1277 

FROM: Boh Stroup, Esq. 
  

FAX NO.: (404) 658-1567 

NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: " 
  

IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CONTACT: 

Jamie Reed 
  

 



    

   
    
    

     
    

   
   
    
   
   
    
   
   
     
   
    
    
    
   
   
    
   
      

  

    AUG-27-'51 TUE 14:11 ID:ROBERT W. CULLEN TEL NO:484 521-1929 H2ed PEZ 

  

MEMORANDUM 

DATE: August 27, 1991 

TO: Bok Reinhardt, Paul Cadenhead, Jack Bogar, Charles 
McCant 

FROM: Bob Stroup 

RE: MoClaskey Proceedings 
  

Belng a sometimes superstitious person, I haves 

hesitated to communicate with you for fear that I would 

upset the quiet which seems to have settled upon us. 

Howaver, I could go on no longer, so here’s a meno to all of 

you. 

Obviously, I have not received a copy of any order from 

Judge Forrester ending our prior federal proceeding. I have 

been expecting lt for some time, and assume it will be along 

shortly. Everything else has been, apparently, equally 

qulat. 

I will be away from my office on business from 

Wednesday afternoon, August 28 through Friday afternoon, 

September 6. I have laft directions wlth my staff that if 

any order comes from either Judge Forrester or the Superior 

Court of Fulton County, Jack Boger should be notified 

immediately. TI have asked Jack to be in touch with you if 

there are any such developments in my absence. 

My secretary (Jamle Reed) and my paralegal (Barry     
Kaltman) both have     
      

phone numbers where I can be reached. 

While I may be unreachable for a couple of days early next



  

   
    
   
   
    

     

  

Hoel PE3 
  gro. oy i-27-'91 TUE 14:12 1D:ROBERT W. CULLEN TEL NO:4@4 521-1929 

week, Barry and Jamie can sven than J - leasages for ne 

which I will pick up. 

I am hopeful that all will remain quiet in my absences, 

but I can return early if necessary to do the remaining 

preparations if a date is sat. 

 



    
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 

AT 

CHAPEL HILL 

SCHOOL OF LAW % ~ CB# 3380, Van Hecke-Wettach Hall 

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 

~ Chapel Hill, N.C. 27599-3380 : 
™) 

3 | \ rt > CC (919) sh 

DATE uly 23 \ 199\ \ / -- 

  

  

  

TO Tau Cadon head FAX NO. oy) 10-6620 
  

  

FROM Jack Boger 

TELEPHONE NO. (a19) 9¢2-&5 6 

  

  

This document consists of 5 pages including this cover sheet. 

If you have any transmission problems please call (919)962-8503. 

MESSAGE. 

Soviny Ye Ho lhe thec in Heo 

Carlier FAK Damsmission - 

Jack 

 



  

      

   

    

  

  

  

  

  
  

? hove Wok Woe Wo 

=~ we naw hn 
  

'] wir sumed lashky and 

  

ould assist 
To) ; 0 Co t McCleshy. 
This E¥2ns, and in its execution he 

admit tofobtain statements fron 

McCle 31d McClesky that he was the uncl 
of B yirator in the robbery) and sg is 

; ol ig conver 
;iving convicting test 

Cle: he was an agent cf ¢ 

cut this prosecutorial endeavor, 

rh
 

Q [ 5 
i 

i
 Y

T 
4 

re 

CT
 

  

{bh
 
o
r
t
 

tT
 

O
m
 

The genius Of our law adopts the ruls of f 

fogulran the prosecution to reveal not only those fa 

indicating guilt, Dut ailsc those facts which might b 

to the ntandnnt. The State revealed the incriminating 

portions ¢of Evans' statement, but at no time revealed to 

MoCleshy's éoungel or to the trial jury the tainted 
  

  

  

  

  

enotici gs nell. SR Sha as the poli ce plant with promise of 

bheneficia 5 “as 
late ag the ap 

r 

from he police for his efforts. Indeed, 
aarance of McClesky's appeal in the Suprene 

a, there was no indication of this inioie some 
  

    e
d
d
 

RD
 

  

  

; nr ral CUE ET RN a» bl ro 
W h Evans. | ae at po LE FESR LTT RR Se—— np 

. = - "a - ha - . a 3 i eid = or MR SR aR hr 
a 2 er SE A OW A NE EY “~ LD AEN ) WG a yp pi 1 SR te A Yr ang KO Sp ge Sg So A wo we -— dh x 
EEE EE ERE ee : —————. TB ET BE TL Le a ne eg eg gi SN J EH Llalit Pte ak - 5 

3 i 3 a ; = ME itn 
ERR i SE EE ER CAS RIES PLY (VF erm SS LEDS ERA CE ER 1p Sra Comm wy vd   A er ER 

TIGL SUC PICSECUCOr Tel RIIUWIcdgE Do madc 
Had So a counsel kricwn at that time what h 

  

(o3
} 

nn
 

IR RRR is aryed, a death penalty EE ——— = 

RE oy wT Newer haar beam Trex 

re ould never Base heen a conviction of malice) 
pp a 

  

     

  

  

  

  

  

  
  

  et HH 
a ay Aina fromm Rh ————   

  e A A ACY 51 rime omar ee of Hl 

1t takes a unanimous vers cf the jury for sw Conv 3 
at least tfcAiurors Watically this verdi 

never have bed raturned had thes fact been revealed 

furery. (of MECles Ret od 

   
     

         
  

  

  

S5105G/bl/ 13.44 

 



  

Sv Tun gyi 0 fa 

Li Yi y had Huy mao fhe hdd alm 
  

  

  

  

; 3 : 
hin” if he carry out his assigned mission. {affidavits of wrdd 
EWO JUIOY ched herelo clearly establish thatf there would 
have been ath penally hodr—isrreteideides lio secubonial & hau 
f rrr nd? 4, : = Daud   

  

  

        

  

    
  A= Tams gr y= Suuunv B ¥ SUNS QE Ly FY SRO J - =~ 4m, TUB i - 

oom j RR ars roy da ie = A ~~ . RE yer = abo =] 2 ake] . - i... 1 a 

. X oe ~~ ys ad 2 hr a re a Ty Fo 2h Py ’; i : I to a a SE this proceeding would not + be 
LE od N i - } ~ fe ¥ PRE - GA TE ale - i} Po ~ : OE - ’] = Lgl 2s -~ ~ currently be heflore this Aeard had this simple act of Fairness Ho triqey, 

0 cweUTied. Accogding to the ‘Jurors j= would have ended at the in Ho val, hy 
~~ " . $i ~ NTT - . id ~ - p= ~ ~ 3 yn 3 a : i rial jey | a bars Lover nin rl eee. This id 

vd J I 7 4 OS BO ETE TR vr iy =p cas S— ie 3 ST SO SLD ES —— 
1 + ode Loy a) EY ct Hs a oh LS ~ Ve REE Eas le od sn To ia at : - 

      

    

  

: yes pd 
5g = - Ev = ee / SDliniia ad lay Ge TT 

jerry a Fh gos ihe tania kod £0 ME TE rs it i TAT LL 4 SL MARL TEA ea BME LA DI ie. 8 DN) Con 7) 7 LT — —— rr 

h a a VR Ca YE Pym nN vy fone : 

    
    

; a key Mess J wash lobar coun his case /. | dua = COL i D&gan an attempt to address this 
igsue within Che judiciaf system, Az a part ©f that endeavor 
he sought habeas corpus through the federal courts and was 

L1H assigned to Judge Owen Bter-of the United Btates Nistrict 
e Court For the Northern District of Georgia. Judge Forrester is 

a the only Judge in the fede¥al system to actually hear the 
evig ’aluale witnesses and enter his Order thereon, That 

) 19 is attached herato ag Exhibit 
3 h 

        

   
   

REESE | a kta 

ance of the Order was that r—Tiststse—iaderais 

in that this information should have been made : 
“Gc the jury in order that the jury might properl sCondi.f 

testimony of Evans. As previously shown jugors 
ion state that had that arrtanygemant been — 

fy, the matter would have terminated 
ince there would have been no death sentence imposed. 

  

   

       
  

  

Appeals through the federal system in this case do not) 
follow a typical pattern. Generally the defense has lozt in 

polite the United States District Court on appeals through the 

: appellate system. Here the defendant wag successful in the 
Misconduct Digtrict Court and the State appealed. Significant quotes from 

the appeliate decisions are instructed on this issue. 

In these guotes the appe 
1 ey 
: 2 IS] 

  

  
1iat I 

testimony of Evans was harmless. Thi 1 

contradiction to statements of jurors who tried the cass, who 

in effect Say that it was not only harmful, it was . 
deterrinative The court in MBcCleshy vw. i Yewn, 753 PF 248, 877 

{1585) et page 885, admits thet Evans' testimony was important 

to the prosecution, stating *. . .we agree that his (Evans') 

testimony added weight to the prosecution's case, we do not 

find that it could 'in any ressonable likellhood' have affected 
the judgment of the jury." It further stated that the police 
offer to "speak & good word” for Fvans wes insufficisnt £0 

amount to a promise to help {yet they did, and nis escape Case 

was dropped). Bot if it did amount to a promise, it was 

  

  

Somthny, in This hdj-page amd foo poge vdiicls follows , TT Heink 

we [050 somo of uo per youn oping thrust. Youn owe 5 tal The 
Clemoney  proese” jc dictinc] pm a : Lp evaluation, amd yet Hus Gpprans fo 
Do, Wit ff, 5 7 : 
}-ENGuLY Ho Load 16Susc talh Meo AR. ”abhepe a Shovter Versi J 2s 

Ly 
§ Q } 

ol 
[s 

”~ oy ~f 4 | 4 C A481 33 1p i C ' . 5 3 v les { Poin Codd SU Somathing lille tho follewisp » * " Weire alady Sam Wu 

 



  

    
  

harmless since "we find it unlikely that 
information would have affected the jury 

| credibility,” {(pege 884). Contradictiug 

jurors who were charged with assessing h 

Bay “.. igucta From affidavits), We th 

appellate court who never saw the witnes 
contradiction to jurcrs who heard the te 

: as very harmful to the defendant the wit 
|] that he wes being convicted solely on te 

who was promised at least some favors by 

After the State's first appeal 
and the appellate court's erroneous supp 

| testimony did not affect the jury, Judge 

4 the matter On the direct lssue of whetihe 
Massiah claim was violated by the police 

into custody. Again Jude ar fou 
nce violated, and ¢ 

(1589 

d 
again the 

In McClesky vv, 78 342 ~ sa   

the undisclosed 
's assessment ofr Evans! 

this entirely were 

is creginiiivy. They 
erefcre have an 

ses surmising in direct 
stimony and diagnosed 

hholding of information 
stimony of a witness 
the police. 

in the federal courts, 

osition that Evans’ 
Forrester again heard 

r McClesky's so-called 
after he was taken 

nd that his rights were 
e defendant, appealed. 
), the appellate court 

g
l
 

a 
A 

ty
 

4 
~
 

acknowledged that 

District Court (Judge Forres 
abused its 

petition.” The effect 
never heard the merits 
abusive petition. The 
Forrester 1s the only federal 

of thi 

the 

discretion in fail 
< 

is in the discretion of 

>r) but that Judge Forrester 

ing to dismiss a clearly abusive 
18 that the appellate court 

claim, but dismissed it as an 
important fact here 1s that Judge 

judge ever to hear the merits of 

in
sl
at
od
 

Co
 

S
i
l
 

oir 
odd

 

  

the matters now presented te this Board, and Judge Forrester ¢n 

ou
 

Il
e 

Co
yp
Pe
s 

ki
a 

at
ed
, 

Yr 
i
n
 To

 
s 

  

  
  

  two occasions agreed that the appellate courts did not consider 
the merits, but dismissed the petition.   

even in the second appeal, (at page 
court stated "under the -harmiess error doctrine, the 

‘prove beyond a reasonable deubt' that the error 
ibute to the verdict obtained.” 
arly under the law when a 

the burden ig on the s 

this i 

Interestingly, 

St
 

I
 

S
A
L
 

5 
m
c
.
 - 

be
Ca

ua
r 

of 
a 
de
c 

a. ;     

de 

te A A 

added} Thus, CC] 

nce like this app 

the wrongful wit 
ontriputs to 

the cour: went 

0 pd
 

™ { =
 

¢ 

a wn
 

ct
 

My
 i 

bs
al
 

Ei 
a 

of 

pe
 

FT
 

I
 

“ 
N
A
 

bo
w 

— r
 

I rr
 

{ 
\ ed
 

od AY
 

[-
 3 d
D
 

LL
 

es
 

I]
 Ae
 

[a
 

[42]
 

nn
 

i wd
 

ry 
0 

+ 

™ 
r Ui
 

® 

ry
 

nn
 

ff
 

Q x +
 

FL 
pi
on
 

i
n
 

2
 

Q 

0
c
 

en
 

£ 
$
x
 

(
o
~
~
 

RB 
of

 
ls
 

Ci
 

[)
 

r
 ()
 

2 — ct
 

bi DO
 

a
d
 

WF
, 

rt
 

I
 

pi
 

[oY
] 

ct
 

M
r
T
 pi
nt
 

S
y
 ay
 

i 
58 

A
D
 

Mm
 

D 

0
 

a 

r
y
 

CY
 

41)
 

ry
 

(6 a - 

B
h
 

I)
 

=
 

a
 

Mh
 

Se 
llr

t 
F
Y
 

\ or
 

T
e
a
m
 

ro
 

a)
 

he
t ac
y 

- iq
 

0)
 

LV
 

0)
 

O
C
 

ot
 

rd
 

i 
78 

@® 

of 
hinge 

i) 

iy
 

~ 
’-

 
—
 

{
7
3
 

4
 

ogi 
0 

EE
 

4 
1 

13
0 

CT
 

Ul
 

de
 

pe
 

ik
 ro

ll)
, S

PE
 

i 
HE

 

ba
t w
 

I 
J 

p
t
 

po
y 

| ~ de
 

A
)
 9]
 

p
p
 

J 

WW
 1 

ER RR Ta 3 

would have 

without FEvns 

Gi
 

w 
ta
l / n 

pt
 

5 
BS

L 
0 

ac
he
 

{y
 

0)
 

bo
 

[ 
- 

Y
n
 

a
i
 

#4
} " t 0]
   ( Cu

 
} 

0 
41

 S
i 

La
 

nm
 
C
E
 

A 1] © i
 

h 
Q
)
 

¢)
 

> — rt
 

ji
 

ar
a 

mo
u 

  

    

  

Hod, bad MEQUeley'c unovs hoad ho hull about Off Bums, po deel 

Senlencr unuld lave boom imp 
Malley vested untn the Pda diene 
hi uth doafle coon co Wau 

a Jeclucal Loge) [ohn Ts 
mi 

  

N < Heel, bad He 

To po 2 Huw evidoucs © 
A hae Gevn ovorruwd, ahs | 

oced 

co 

- 

nol. ds To MN skey c ace beaume a pan 

Priya Vola ob F Led ond bg fess Copilo 

Daring Spal rounds o Gal 
   



ENNRILES LS BYE ane Day mwa laa ns HURT RICHARDSON 
Zh BY: M f—-16—91 y Siva FT od ' nd WY A Lo ARUS ON 

A S A, 7 OSCE 4] 

| ha el 
pele Miceanduct wa hawk “ery, fe 
Li Jobd ug snk nut salt 

a Deociy Le Vu) Lhd ty 
2 EYE OTR ME i IE Q 25 o> Lidl (SET — y YS wa wa 4 

; Pe— == iy ‘ Chi —— Nag: a ffidavi ro BOAR on -— who Sibi (diTE “contradic : i: the appe 50h ccu rtf Fim SUrmg,, IoC ~~ — ey as v9 304 3 ne ~ERTE rvs re Yul. : . Se Ba aT I I ‘i Ti MN - - Fe SUT T- ~ 
mes —— =f AL bald v No Ar “er Nm 3  w ‘ev am no 2 §1= 

0 We
 

I<) 

) 

~d
 

~J
 

  

    

  

    

  

  

   
  

court de zals with what conceivably might have been. The jurors 
deal with what actually Was, 

del nd dowel c= fhe appellate cour £3 wes ey Hs 
ue cCiocky.o Claim on the merits." Fherat orn, the a mexits of the claim were never considered by anyone except 

rd Judge Forrester who found them meritorious. We go into goa 
Bid 

  

  

here for the purpose of urging on this Board its respons 
to hear the merits, hear what would have been the EER i 
this simple requirement been met and hear Judge Forrester's 
judicial determination that ‘in cons idering the merits of the 
case, and not some legal motion to dismiss, the State 
improperly obtained a conviction eon the malice murder charge 
and its ultimate death sentence 

|
 

pe
de

 

F
A
 

b 

  | “> again, as stated earlier in this presentaticn, 
had this simple fact been divulged to the jury, there would 
never been appeals and we would not be before this Board. We 
therefore ask this Board to look back and put in place that 
which should have been done in the first instance. When that 
15 gone, McClesky will serve the sentence and pay the debt to ] 
society he owes f Or the crime he committed, but he will not 

at the hands of a jury who now state they 
mposed that sentence had they known the true 

brrester who heard the matter, and 
Ef statements from the durcys. arrived at tha 

1 ; 37 ] 
same conclusion. IF HF ol eof vee gms, ) (is nd Alpe 

i 

would never have 
fo 

  

  

  
  

     
  

    
Balik Hao IR AVE iT oS Te sina Chad a JUTGT =D impeach 

his or her own verdict nn, Armies 1 e iol 
syst Sheets the paper cn which a verdict 
EATER Wor ated earlier, however, 8 
bound by tho it can and shon 
——ttaat ATE hey were not giv 

an had thoy known to the pol 
from the jury, >uld never have : 
was; there would y (ave been the long ap j 

i gard, ¥his Boar 

  

  

permitted the jury to judge the 
credibility which they based the sentence. ; 

  

      
  

(W
F)

 

[A
 5105C/bi/! 

 



  

July 23, 1991 

Ms. Patsy Morris 
Georgia Resource Center 
920 Ponce de leon Street, N.E. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30306 

Warren McCleskey v. Walter D. Zant 
  

Dear Patsy: 

I am enclosing copies of two telephone bills recently sent 
to me by the University of North. These bills reflect my long- 
distance telephone calls from my office telephone during April 
and May of 1991. As you will see from the notations which I have 
made adjacent to each telephone call, many of the charges are 
attributable to calls made during my representation of Warren 
McCleskey and/or William Moore, both Georgia inmates. The total 
of these charges is as follows: 

  

April, 1991 $ 87.05 

May, 199) $ 63.60 

TOTAL: $150.65 

I would be grateful if the Resource Center could reimburse 
me for these out-of-pocket expenses. Thank‘you very much. 

Sincerely, 

2 
n Charles Boger 

School of law, CB # 3380 
University of North Carolina 
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599