Motion for Stay of Execution Pending Disposition of Motion for New Trial; Memorandum

    N
o
 

a
s
 
5
 
e
n
 
#
9
 

a
»
 

"
=
 
F
F
 
S
a
 
5
 
a
n
 

a
e
 
B
S
 
9
%
 
8
 

’ 
: ¥ 

e
s
 

o
o
»
 

L
L
 

w
n
 
o
n
 

330-8 NO Ng 

r
E
 
9
%
 

8
 
8
%
 
*
%
 

8
 

B
H
 
&
9
 

S
a
t
 

®
 

#
1
 

F
f
 

~
~
"
 

W
 

cas 

eC 

o
r
 
S
a
 
5
 

o
e
 

8
 

*
%
 

a
0
 

=
»
 

o
e
 
e
e
 
&
8
 

S
a
 

w
 

o
p
 

i
 

" 

o
F
 

- 
T 

en 
¢ 

"
i
 

v B 
EE \ 

I P
o
 

, 
f
o
 

a
]
 

o
y
 

y
w
 

*
o
 

o
a
 

s
e
 

r
h
 

e
n
 

LE) 

¢
e
 

e
n
 

o
e
 

w
e
 

e
w
 

o
e
 

+
s
 

v
e
 

o
n
 

L
E
 

o
n
 

*
w
 

o
w
 

n
e
 

w
a
 

s
e
 

v
e
 

w
e
 

-
»
 

L
h
 

L
a
 J 

e
s
 

o
e
 

a
e
 

L
a
 

e
w
 

o
w
 

L
L
 

L
E
 J 

*
e
 

L
d
 

‘
a
l
 

“
a
 

.
e
 

L
E
]
 

v
e
 

a
d
 

L
B
 

*
e
 

*
e
 

T
e
 

s
n
 

a
»
 

L
&
 J 

*
a
 

“
e
 

n
e
 

»
s
 

*
s
.
 

a
a
 

e
e
 

o
r
 

a
e
 

w
e
 

w
y
 

e
e
 

L
&
E
 J 

o
n
 

L
 2
]
 

8
 

L
a
 

*
a
 

L
a
 

=
e
 

v
e
 

w
s
 

b
e
 

a
y
 

w
e
 

e
s
 

LE] 

a
 

i
a
 

«
o
e
 

o
y
 

«
e
o
 

ad 

L
a
d
 

*
s
 

L
a
 

*
®
 

.
e
 

a
]
 

L
E
 J 

y
r
 

a
s
 

a
d
 

*
w
 

o
w
 

«
e
s
 

3
 

r
e
 

“
e
n
 

*
e
 

L
a
 

a
e
 

o
e
 

B
R
 

*
w
 

0 B8ll= 
de 
LF = 

ers 
A
 

whi 

a ere ment ent Jud, x 
ht 

nM 4+} 
#1 force, 

. 

ant. 
3 

to del result hl 
bd 

8] 
Lue 
~~ del y mlght ry 

& 

t] 
L 

w 
ni 3 

Ld reps 

<Q 
e
t
 

¢
 

e
d
 

#
4
 

un 
©
 

: 
o
n
 
—
 

«
3
 

—
 

~~ 

Ss 
SH 

p
>
 

~
~
 

hls 
“
W
 

h
o
d
 

S
v
 

on of 

©
 ¥ 

£ 
QL 4 

J 

o/ 
et 2 

at 
e for a £3 

we 
a 

& 4M 

106 
N 

ROOV 4 
= 10 i int) ered ~& 

RS 

: 
ni 

) 

on 

0
 

op} 

-
 

u
w
 

sped . ar : 
[ & orleans iv 3 : 



# ® 

TD, yom w on F Beng i JE 

a, the necessity of 

¥ bond 1s dispensed with, 

1 1 y we P| - i ns, Louisiana, day of April, 1302. 



a * 

$ ) STATES DISTRICT COURT 

ER 1 ww LYE 

NEW ORLEANS DIVISION 

H L i Adle 9 ep 

LE. J 
LAE BE J 

LB. 
RE 

vo tse 
Vi ‘eo LIE I 

{BE I J 

LE BR J 

ZT TA HTS 1 OY PLETAS Ty TITY A £FUTLY ART 

tJ CANS : Sie FILH 1, 3 4 ig $2113 Civil ACT FR#IL 

i AY EE 
wide 9 LIE I pi 

TS L Ts A NI PO NEY oF 28 0 ia 
DIE] NA wid 48 @ uw NO o LE Imi) 

. 28 
é 5 8 

. >» 
ss 8 1 

* 

a. 0 
5 2 9 

ae 
. 5 8 

EE 
se 

ss 4 » ] HEE ENE ESE EERE EEE NN EEE SE ER ENE ERT EERE EERE EE RY FEE EEE EEE 

HEE EER EE ER ER EE RF A RE EE RRL REEL EEE ENE PEN R EERE ERE EEE 

££ tule 02 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure covers 

the power of the Court to stay proceedings to enforce a judg= 

ment 

Section (a) of sald Rule deals with the automatic stay, 

which covers the first ten days after the entry of judgment, 

‘his section provides that an injunetion 1s not automatically 

stayed, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, o
 

Section (b) of Rule 62 gives the trial court discretion 

to stay the execution of a judgment pending the disposition of 

a motion for a new trial, 

"In 1ts discretion and on such eonditions for 
the security of the adverse party as are 
proper, the court may stay the execution of 
or any proceedings to enforce a Judgment pend=- 
ing the disposition of a motion for a new 
trial,.." Fed, Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 

In the instant case, defendant has filed a motion for a 

new trial, and the hearing of sald motion has been set for May 

8, 1962, 1 reasonable to assume that the Court might take 

the motion under advisement after the hearing. It is also 

reasonable to assume that if a new trial is granted herein, 

there will be an additional lapse of time before the new trial 

is held, and a further lapse of time before a Judgment 1s render- 

ed after the new trial, 

——— 



¥ 1 2 9 de 2 wa 4 bl Fa g %l ¢ 3 7 (Tih i le : "y £5 0 In the interim, defendants must prepare for a new 
Alin 

x ® 1. 1. 2 u ' RY ne oats sok wn Tn -~ on i. school term, which begl ns in September of 19062 ® 4116 2 5 

current school term is drawing to a elose, and it is ime 

perative that defendants make and carry out, without 

urther delay, plans for the registration, assignment, and 

transfer of students for the September Yom. | 

i "| oh: > Go py £% 

common knowledge that the paroe 

school aystem in the City of New Orleans has already con- 

ducted its registration for the coming school term. 

J i 

n 

adopted 1lts procedure for the assignment, transfer and con- 

C
T
 

L 

tinuance of all pupils for the school year 1961-196 

April 2h, 1961 (See Exhibit P-~5), Since April 2li, 1962 is 

now upon us, if the judgment previously entered herein is 

not stayed, defendants will not have sufficient time to 

properly prepare for the opening of school in September of 

this year, 

The granting of a motion for a stay pending the dis- 

position of a motion for a new trial lies within the sound 

discretion of the trial court, See Rule 62 (b), supra;j 

LF} 

iaylor vs, Board of Education of City School District of 

City of New Rochelle, (D.C.N.¥, 1961) 195 8. Supp.231, af=- 

firmed 29, ¥, (2d) 36; Holmes vs, Danner, (D.C. Ca. 1961), 

be 4 " be —- SITE Fo - 
e8peceil ily ubmit ted, 

samuel 1, Rosenberg 
i 3 pag on £ de 1 } on wad 1- 

Now. leans, Lou isi 
wd § 

20 p 

he record in the case at bar shows that the defends inte