Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Edward Still, Esq. Re Hunter v. Underwood
Correspondence
February 1, 1985

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Edward Still, Esq. Re Hunter v. Underwood, 1985. 75f4e148-e892-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/39318b53-8372-4b0d-85a9-0578549a0ee1/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-edward-still-esq-re-hunter-v-underwood. Accessed April 30, 2025.
Copied!
Lesa,U&renseH. February I, 1985 Edward Sti11, Esg. Reeves and StilI Suite 400, Cormerce Center 2027 1st Avenue, North Birmingham, AL 35203 Dear Ed: I am sorry that I will not be able to attend the Supreme Court argument in Hunter v. Under:nood. I am confident you will persuade ffiEGffi that it should not have taken the case in the first p1ace. I am sending a copy of your letter to Professor Richard Briffault who worked with me on our amicus- Perhaps he can rePresent us. Best of luck. Break a Ieg. Sincepely,,./ \.-. -- >. {.,, .','r.\'LanJ Guinier LG/ r cc: Professor Richard Briffauit Contibutions are deductible Jor U.S. income tat purposes The NAACp LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND is not part o{ the National Association tor the Advancement of colore_d People although it *al tounOeO tV it and shares its commitment to equal rights. LDF has had tor over 25 years a separate 8oard, program. stalr, orfice and budget. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 99 Hudson Street, New York, N.Y. 100'l3o(212) 219-1900