Motion and Supporting Brief for Permission to Appear, File Brief, and Make Argument as Amicus Curiae
Public Court Documents
November 10, 1999
8 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Motion and Supporting Brief for Permission to Appear, File Brief, and Make Argument as Amicus Curiae, 1999. a6de70c4-e40e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3b0c91b5-c737-43fe-bdaf-4f00d5421a47/motion-and-supporting-brief-for-permission-to-appear-file-brief-and-make-argument-as-amicus-curiae. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
bd -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
Civil Action No. 4-96-CV-104-BO(3)
MARTIN CROMARTIE, et. al.,
Plaintiffs,
v. MOTION FOR PERMISSION
TO APPEAR, FILE BRIEF, AND
JAMES B. HUNT, JR., in his official MAKE ARGUMENT AS
AMICUS CURIAE
Rule 24(b), F.R. Civ. P.
capacity as Governor of the State of
North Carolina, et. al.,
Defendants,
and
ALFRED SMALLWOOD, et. al.,
Defendant, Intervenors
S
N
e
”
N
e
”
N
e
N
r
N
e
”
N
e
”
N
e
”
S
e
N
r
N
e
S
e
N
e
N
e
N
e
S
N
N
e
S
N
N
e
Movants, CASS BALLENGER, HOWARD COBLE, RICHARD BURR, SUE
MYRICK, WALTER JONES, ROBIN HAYES, and CHARLES TAYLOR, by and through
their counsel, pursuant to Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure request
permission from the court to appear, file a brief, and make oral argument as amicus
curiae in the above-captioned action, and as reasons therefor would show:
1. Movants are incumbent Congressmen from the Tenth, Sixth, Fifth, Ninth,
Third, Eighth, and Eleventh Congressional district in North Carolinas, respectively, all
9 ww
of whom presently intend to file for re-election in the year 2000. The movants affiliate
with the Republican party.
2. Movant's attorney is duly licensed to practice law in the State of North
Carolina and has practiced law in that state since 1973. During that period, much of
counsel’s practice has been involved in election law and redistricting matters and he has
become recognized as experienced in that area of the law.
3. The question at issue in this case is one that is of vital interest to the movants
and the public in that the outcome of this case will significantly affect their candidacies
and their constituents in the elections for Congress in 2000, and counsel's specialized
knowledge in this area of the law would be of value to the court.
4. Movant's counsel has conferred with counsel for the Attorney General,
Plaintiff's counsel, and defendant interveners’ counsel, and all have consented to this
permissive intervention as amicus curiae counsel. Movants are content to appear as the
issues have been developed and know of no reason why their participation as amicus
curiae should delay the trial of this matter
Wherefore, movants request that movants’ counsel be permitted to appear as
amicus curiae in this action, participate in the trial as requested by the court, to file a
brief and make oral argument therein relevant to the issues currently before the court
kA w
and, if needed, assist in formulating, submitting, or commenting on a remedy should a
This /O day of November 1999.
Ls
ROBERT N. HUNTER, JR.
Attorney for Movants
Hunter, Johnston, Elam & Benjamin, PLLC
822 North Elm Street, Suite 200
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
Phone: 336-273-1600
violation of law be established.
Fax: 336-274-4650
State Bar No. 05314
w
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
Civil Action No. 4-96-CV-104-BO(3)
MARTIN CROMARTIE, et. al.,,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JAMES B. HUNT, JR., in his official
capacity as Governor of the State of
North Carolina, et. al.,
Defendants,
and
ALFRED SMALLWOOQD, et. al.,
Defendant, Intervenors
S
N
e
S
N
”
N
e
’
N
r
N
a
N
e
N
e
N
e
N
e
N
e
S
e
N
e
N
a
N
e
N
e
N
e
S
e
N
S
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR,
FILE BRIEF, AND MAKE ARGUMENT
AS AMICUS CURIAE
THE HONORABLE Cass Ballenger, Howard Coble, Richard Burr, Sue Myrick,
Walter Jones, Robin Hayes, and Charles Taylor (hereinafter referred to as “the
Representatives”), move the Court for leave to participate in the above-styled action as
amici curiae and to enter a brief. The Representatives are the incumbent Congressmen
and Congresswoman for seven districts in North Carolina which surround the two
challenged districts. Collectively these Congressmen and Congresswoman represent
over one half (*2) of the citizens of the State of North Carolina. The question at issue in
this case is one that is of vital interest to the Representatives and their constituents in
- ww
that the outcome of this case will significantly affect their candidacies and their
constituents in the elections for Congress in 2000.
The Representatives’ attorney is recognized as an expert in the field of election
law and more specifically redistricting. In addition, the Representatives are the
incumbent Republicans for the districts that are directly effected by the proposed
redistricting plan.
Because of the Representatives’ unique position they clearly meet the standard
established for amicus participation. See United States v. State of Louisiana, 751 F. Supp.
608, 620 (E.D. La. 1990) (a party “seeking to appear as amicus must merely make a
showing that his participation is useful to or otherwise desirable by the court.”) Should
a constitutional violation be found, the effect of a remedy on these districts could be
dramatic. Their comments on any remedy proposed should be useful to or otherwise
desirable by the Court. Based upon the foregoing, and for other good cause, they seek
leave to participate as amici curiae to address issues raised by the pending constitutional
challenge to the State of North Carolina's 1998 congressional redistricting plan. The
Representatives’ participation as amici would not delay the adjudication of this case or
otherwise prejudice the parties, all of whom have consented to this motion.
WHEREFORE, the Representatives respectfully moves this Court to allow it to
participate as amici curiae and to file a brief addressing the issues now before this Court,
and if needed to supply remedial plans or comments thereon.
Respectfully gubmitted,
ROBERT N. HUNTER, JR.
Attorney for Movants
Hunter, Johnston, Elam & Benjamin, PLLC
822 North Elm Street, Suite 200
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
Phone: 336-273-1600
Fax: 336-274-4650
State Bar No: 05314
“ -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
Civil Action No. 4-96-CV-104-BO(3)
MARTIN CROMARTIE, et. al,
Plaintiffs,
Vv.
JAMES B. HUNT, JR., in his official
capacity as Governor of the State of
North Carolina, et. al.,
Defendants,
and
ALFRED SMALLWOOD, et. al.,
Defendant, Intervenors
N
e
S
e
”
N
e
N
e
N
e
N
e
N
e
N
e
N
e
N
e
N
e
N
a
N
a
N
a
N
a
N
a
N
a
N
s
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that he has served a copy of the foregoing MOTION
FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR, FILE BRIEF, AND MAKE ARGUMENT AS AMICUS
CURIAE and BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR, FILE
BRIEF, AND MAKE ARGUMENT AS AMICUS CURIAE on the following parties in interest
by depositing a copy thereof in the care and custody of the United States Postal Service, first-
class postage prepaid, addressed to said parties at their last known address as listed below in the
manner prescribed by law:
Tiare B. Smiley,
Special Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
North Carolina Department of Justice
Post Office Box 629
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27602
bad @
Robinson O. Everett
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Suite 300, First Union National Bank Building
301 West Main Street
Durham, North Carolina 27702
Adam Stein
Attorney for Defendant-Intervenors
Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins, Gresham & Sumter, P.A.
Suite 2, 312 West Franklin Street
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516
Todd A. Cox
Attorney for Defendant-Intervenors
NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
1444 1 Street NW, 10™ Floor
Washington, DC 20005
This the / 4 day of November, 1999 /
ROBERT N. HUNTER, JR.
Attorney for Movants
Hunter, Johnston, Elam & Benjamin, PLLC
822 North Elm Street, Suite 200
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
Phone: 336-273-1600
Fax: 336-274-4650
State Bar No. 05314