Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Tim Humphries, Esq. Re Whitfield v. Clinton

Correspondence
January 25, 1988

Cite this item

Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Tim Humphries, Esq. Re Whitfield v. Clinton preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Matter
- Lani Guinier Correspondence
Case
- Lani Guinier Correspondence
U.S. state
- General
Collection
- Legal Department General
Taxonomy
Identifier
- a96cdf30-ec92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Tim Humphries, Esq. Re Whitfield v. Clinton, 1988. a96cdf30-ec92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3b9e8d08-bf65-4a43-9525-55a64f969f3f/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-tim-humphries-esq-re-whitfield-v-clinton. Accessed December 04, 2025.

Copied!

January 25, 1988

Tim Humphries, Esg.
Office of the Attorney GeneraJ.
State of Arkansas
2ol East Markham Street
Heritage West Building
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201

Re: I,lhitf ield v. Clinton

Dear Mr. Humphries:

f have spoken to Dr. Engstrom, and he js prepared to be
deposed on the morning of Saturday, February 6,1988, in New
Orfeans, Loujsjana. Dr. Engstrom's office wiIL be cl.osed that
day. Therefore, 1zou should arrange to take the deposjtion at
another Location (perhaps a room at your hotel). Dr. Engstrom
will bring the materials you mentioned in your Letter of January
15, 1988. I remind you of our Third Supplementa.l. Responses to
Defendants'Expert 9{itness Interrogatories 36 and 37 regardinE
data prepared spec:aj.1y by the Bureau of the Census and purchased
by plaintiffs.

When Dr. Engstrom's deposition had originally been scheduLed
for February L, 1988, lou had agreed to inform plaintiffs of your
decjsion whether to retain a:: expert within one week of deposj.ng
Dr. Engstrom (and therefore prior to February 10, 1988, when the
pretrjaL jnformation sheet is due), and to make your expert
available for deposition a reasonable time thereafter. By
agreeing to reschedu-le at your request, wB are not waiving any
claims that we have to be informed by February 10, l.988, of alL
the witnesses you intend to caLl. AccordingJy, w€ are producing
Dr. Engstrom for deposition after the discovery per:.od under the
unCerstanding:

( 1 ) that you will inform us no Late:' than
February 10, 1988, whether you have decideo
to retain an expert who will. testify at
trial, and, if you have, the identity of any
such experts;

(2) that you will timely supplement your
responses to plaintiffs' Interrogatories 31

NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET, 16th FLOOR o (2121219'1900 . NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013

Tim Humphries, Esg.
January 25, 1988
Page 2

(3)

and 32 (regarding expert witnesses);

that you will inform us as soon as your
expert has completed his or her analysis;

(4) that you will make your expert available fordeposition at plaintiffs, convenience and at
least one week prior to the trial in this
case.

rf you have any probl.ems with this, fet us know by Februaryl, 1988. otherwise, please mail a signed copy of this letter t;us in time to arrive prior to Dr. Engstrom's deposition.
As for Dr. Gates, plaintiffs witl produce her for adeposition at a time that is mutuarly convenient for her, you,

and us.

r expect to hear from you concerning the logistics of Dr.
Engrstrom' s deposition

cc: All counseL

Agreed:

Si4pqreIy,

,"Jd*,l,Sl,l+L
Attorney for Plaintiffs

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Tim Humphries, Esq. Re Whitfield v. Clinton

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in